Is fight for Scottish independence based on literary hoax?

"Ossian Receiving the Ghosts of Fallen French Heroes," Anne-Louis Girodet, 1805, public domain

“Ossian Receiving the Ghosts of Fallen French Heroes,” Anne-Louis Girodet, 1805, public domain

Actually, yes.  It sort of is.  At least in part.

I’ve always been fascinated by con artistry, by politics, and by literature, so I love the fact that the upcoming independence vote in Scotland gives me a chance to talk about all three.

In case you’ve missed it, the voters of Scotland go to the polls this week to decide whether they should exist as an entirely autonomous nation, separate from the United Kingdom.

The outcome?  I couldn’t care less.

But it’s incredibly cool that one of the first big catalysts shaping Scottish identity was a massive fraud perpetrated by a poet in the 1700s.  James Macpherson cooked up a series of poems which he claimed were translations of an ancient cycle of myths, tapping the root of Scotland’s indigenous culture.

The narrator of the poems, a figure dubbed “Ossian,” was described as a kind of Scottish-Celtic version of Homer.

Macpherson’s goal was to convince Europe’s big thinkers – and his fellow Scottish citizens at home – that their homeland had a history and a future independent of England.  And it worked.  People bought it and the poems were a huge hit.

They were translated into French, Italian, Russian, Polish and German and became a kind of fad as far away as the Americas, where Thomas Jefferson was a fan.   Goethe wrote about Ossian and an opera based on the poems appeared in 1804.  Ingres and other great painters took up the poems.

The trouble, of course, is that Ossian never existed and the entire epic cycle of poems that supposedly provided one foundation of Scottish identity was cooked up in Macpherson’s imagination, based loosely on various poems and legends cribbed from around the British Isles and Ireland.

A debate raged through the late 1700s about their authenticity, with figures like Voltaire and Samuel Johnson expressing skepticism and scorn, while many Scots defended the work and embraced it as a cornerstone of their culture.

In his 2009 book about the ruse, Thomas Curley described the Ossian poems as “the most successful literary falsehood in modern history.” The poems still linger in the imagination because they were, by most accounts, fairly well written, if you go in for ponderous, vaguely Tolkien-esque fantasy.

“As flies the inconstant sun over Larmon’s grassy hill,” Macpherson wrote, “so pass the tales of old along my soul by night! When bards are removed to their place, when harps are hung in Selma’s hall, then comes a voice to Ossian, and awakes his soul! It is the voice of years that are gone!   They roll before me with all their deeds! I seize the tales as they pass, and pour them forth in song.”

And so on.  It turns out this kind of cultural flim-flam is nothing particularly out of the ordinary.

Many of the great works about early American culture and life are, in fact, pure put-ons.  “The Education of Little Tree,” a best-selling first-person account of Cherokee life, was written by a white guy, who also happened to be a former member of the Ku Klux Klan.  Another popular book, an “autobiography” of Davy Crocket’s life in the American West, was a fake.

Benjamin Franklin, whose writings helped craft the early American identity, worked under several fictional guises, male and female, before our War of Independence.  While writing under the pseudonym Richard Saunders, Franklin argued that “historians relate not so much what is done as what they would have believed.”

Much the same can be said for these mytho-propagandists.  They create a sense of history and identity that can be awesomely powerful, lingering long after the truth is revealed.

If the Scots do go their own way this week, claiming independence, there will be many causes, many inspirations.  But it’s delightful and weird that two of their earliest icons will have been a great poet who never existed and a literary con-man who charmed the best minds of Europe.

4 Comments on “Is fight for Scottish independence based on literary hoax?”

  1. Elaine says:

    Just finished an illuminating study of the Stuarts & Tudors. I went into it understanding that Mary was just “that other woman,” the so-called Queen of the Scots.” I came out understanding that Scotland struggled for centuries to keep a very arrogant and oppressive England out of their business (and land). Their most effective centuries-long strategy was to maintain “the auld alliance” with France. A French-leaning Scotland? Who knew? (Perhaps everyone but me.)

    In any case, while these events were later than the mythical Ossian, they formed a real foundation for the patriotic impulses of James Macpherson. Your observations about myth are interesting — perhaps still timely today. But, in fact, the Scots do have a real history and it really isn’t English.

    Like/Dislike this comment: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

  2. Mervel says:

    The power of poetry. Does it have that same influence today?

    I was surprised how small Scotland’s population was; around 5 million.

    Like/Dislike this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Jeff says:

    There economic strength in geography, because of resources, and population and collective thought. Here in the northcountry we are considering dissolution of political boundaries to meet economic and transportation realities. We don’t need multiple layers of government.

    Scotland, if it breaks out, will be impaired by its new boundaries. Physically it is 2/3 the size of NY but it shares currency with England, and has its own currency. Russia is attempting to carve out a piece of the Ukraine if it can’t have it all. Hungary has been hacked up. A greater union makes for greater success and less volatility. Sure it is their decision. We can’t affect the decision so we’ll have to deal with it as much as we deal with other governmental changes. I didn’t have to show a passport between Scotland and England.

    Scotland’s history of influence from the north and the Northeast goes back earlier than the influence of France. The Roman,Hadrian, built his wall to keep the troublesome tribes out of most of what is now England.

    In Pennsylvania, initially a Quaker refuge, the Scots-Irish were put on the frontier lands because the German farmers and the Quakers were not as willing to defend themselves and the settlements. If the Penn family was to get quit-rent for its lands it needed settlers on the land.

    Like/Dislike this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. PictADK says:

    Brian, In your words….

    “In case you’ve missed it, the voters of Scotland go to the polls this week to decide whether they should exist as an entirely autonomous nation, separate from the United Kingdom.
    The outcome? I couldn’t care less.”

    As a Scottish born ADK resident – I DO care and hope the vote is YES! This independence referendum is hugely important, far beyond local geographies and histories. A very rare demonstration of a long term democratic process in a world torn by civil wars. How civilized – that’s something to care about for many reasons.

    Like/Dislike this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Comments are closed.