Posts Tagged ‘canada’

Montreal Mayor Michael Applebaum resigns

Montreal mayor Michael Applebaum photographed in 2009. Photo: abdallahh, Creative Commonns, some rights reserved

Montreal interim mayor Michael Applebaum, photographed in 2009. Photo: abdallahh, Creative Commonns, some rights reserved

Montreal mayor Michael Applebaum resigned today. He was arrested yesterday on 14 charges including fraud, breach of trust, conspiracy, and municipal corruption.

In a press conference this afternoon, Applebaum told reporters that he’s innocent and “I have never taken a penny from everybody.”

You can watch the CBC’s video of that press conference here.

The CBC also reports that “the province and the majority of municipal councillors have said the city should select an interim mayor to serve until the next municipal election in November, rather than placing the city under trusteeship or advancing the date of the municipal election.”

The charges against Applebaum have to do with 2 real estate transactions that took place between 2006 and 2011 when Applebaum was borough mayor of Côte-des-Neiges-Notre-Dame-de-Grâce.

Two other former borough officials were arrested yesterday.

Paul Cellucci remembered for blunt talk during tough times

Former US Ambassador Paul Cellucii in Banff, Alberta in 2010. Photo: US Embassy Canada.

Former US Ambassador Paul Cellucii in Banff, Alberta in 2010. Photo: US Embassy Canada.

Former Massachusetts governor and former U.S. Ambassador to Canada Paul Cellucci died on Saturday from complications of ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease.

Cellucci is being lauded as a down-to-earth, forthright speaker. (The word “blunt” is often invoked.) He’s also being recalled as a politician widely respected by both parties.

Across three decades of public office he never lost an election. An in-depth summary of Cellucci’s personality and political career can be read in this article by the Boston Globe’s Belle English.

“He was a completely different type of governor in terms of his background,” said Rob Gray, who served as a chief political adviser to Mr. Cellucci.

“Growing up outside the Boston-Route 128 bubble and continuing to hang out with average people on a daily basis really shaped his views of the issues,” said Gray, president of Gray Media Group. “Paul was staunchly antitax and very frugal when it came to the budget, but he knew that certain types of government spending helped average people. He wasn’t just symbolically a man of the people; that’s what he really was.”

Cellucci was a long-time supporter of George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. When the younger Bush became president in 2001, he quickly appointed Cellucci as U.S. Ambassador to Canada, a post Cellucci held until 2005.

Here’s how that appointment was characterized by the Ottawa Citizen’s Zev Singer:

Cellucci typified the recent shift in diplomacy between the two countries from the polite, non-partisan career foreign service officer to the more political and outspoken appointee not afraid to take a message from the Oval Office directly to the public.

Cellucci was the top U.S. diplomat in Ottawa during the Sept 11 attacks when planes were grounded and many were diverted to Canada. The co-operation and hospitality generated by that effort are still remembered warmly in both nations.

But the subsequent debate about going to war in Iraq produced some sense of betrayal from the U.S. perspective, after Prime Minister Jean Chretién decided Canada would opt out. That frustration was described in Cellucci’s 2005 book: Unquiet Diplomacy. (Here is a review and here is an excerpt.)

Cellucci knew he ruffled feathers by lecturing Canadians in bully-pulpit style. But he had few regrets.

“…at all times I felt confident that most people would realize that I had paid Canadians one of the best compliments that you can pay a friend. I told them the truth, as I saw it.”

Having moved to Ontario in 1999, I can attest that Cellucci faced a challenge that might be described as guilt by association: George Bush was profoundly unpopular in Canada.

The argument remains: do nations have to up their military game in response to heightened dangers in the world arena? If so, how and where should that be done?

But in Canada, during the early 2000′s, that argument was often rejected outright because of distaste for the messenger’s boss.

Post 9/11 Canada did strengthen its military capacity, as Cellucci and others advocated – a shift hailed by some, decried by others.

Opinions on the lessons of 9/11 are many and varied. But Cellucci was the man in the middle during a fractious time in U.S./Canada relations.

Video: B.C. bear easily opens car doors

As reported by CBC, here you go: a video showing at least one bear in British Columbia opening car doors with ease:

Still from Youtube video above, posted by Rebecca Moore.

Still from Youtube video above, posted by Rebecca Moore.

How easily? Well, this particular bear is probably planning to take up driving next. (I expect the video may go viral. But it is starting out in Canada, so perhaps it hasn’t hit the U.S. yet.)

The CBC story quotes a conservation officer as saying people in bear country – and campers – tempt this sort of bear attention by stashing food or garbage inside vehicles. He says: Don’t do it! Bears will try to gain entry and can do considerable damage. Food needs to be stored in bear-resistant containers.

Not that those are always a sure thing, according to this 2009 Adirondack-area article in the New York Times.

It appears bears are smart enough that smarter-than-average bears are amazing indeed.

Radio-Canada name change puts CBC back in the headlines

Radio Canada's new logo is "here." Image: ICI Radio Canada

Radio Canada’s new logo is “here.” Image: ICI Radio Canada

Fresh from controversy over adding advertisements to its music service outlets, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation is back in the news on this side of the border for a “re-branding” shift.

CBC’s French programing has long operated under the dignified moniker of “Radio-Canada”.

This past Wednesday, CBC announced that name would be bumped down as a sub-heading, under a new, one-word symbol: ICI. News reports had plenty to say, including statements of concern from the Heritage Minister. By Thursday, CBC’s initial announcement was already being clarified, which isn’t usually necessary if announcements are welcomed, or ignored.

Reaction has been critical on the whole. Here’s a sample editorial from the Toronto Star:

Can anyone imagine the British Broadcasting Corp. dropping the BBC thing and rebranding itself as THIS on the Internet, as in THIS.uk? You know, from the old-time BBC Empire Service call signal: This is London calling. They’d have been laughed to scorn.

Well, Société Radio-Canada has just rebaptized its operations HERE, from its own call signal Ici Radio-Canada. And that’s no joke.

The Sun news chain has been a voracious critic of the CBC, frequently portraying CBC as a bloated, secretive organization feasting off tax dollars. So it’s no surprise that columnists there are heaping scorn on the move, as with this reaction by Brian Lilley of the Ottawa Sun. He rounded up various responses worth quoting:

“Well, first of all, as a consumer, I’m quite disappointed,” NDP heritage critic and CBC/Radio-Canada booster Pierre Nantel told reporters after the announcement. Later, Nantel added, “This is a weird call.”

I’d have to agree and so would former Liberal leader and Montreal MP Stephane Dion, who thought people were playing a joke on him when he was first asked about it.

What did the re-branding cost? According to this CBC Montreal article:

Radio-Canada hasn’t said how much money is being spent on the rebranding effort, but says $400,000 was spent on external consultants while 95 per cent of the work was covered by existing communications budgets.

More background from CBC Radio-Canada on the name change can also be found here.

 

Pacific Nations Cup rugby comes to Ontario

The Fijian rugby team lay down the challenge to Canada in a 2007 match in Cardiff. Photo: Rob Stradling, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

The Fijian rugby team lay down the challenge to Canada in a 2007 match in Cardiff. Photo: Rob Stradling, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

An Ottawa cyclist I know was commuting home on sleepy Twin Elm Road last Wednesday evening. Only it was far from sleepy! He said it was crawling with cars and people, flocking to see a big rugby match between Canada and Fiji, part of the 2013 Pacific Nations Cup matches, which began in May and conclude June 23rd.

Twin Elm Road bisects farm country between Richmond and Nepean, to the south-west of urban Ottawa. One of its better-kept secrets is a rather nice rugby pitch, Twin Elm Rugby Park.

Team Canada fans in Cardiff. Photo: Rob Stradling, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Team Canada fans in Cardiff. Photo: Rob Stradling, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Canada took that match, edging out a 20-18 win, as detailed in this article by Robert Murray from the Rugby Canada website (which includes video of game highlights.). Here’s more coverage from the Ottawa Sun, with 10 photos.

According to the International Rugby Board, Canada and the USA are new additions to this Pacific Nations grouping, which includes Fiji, Tonga and Japan. Defending champion Samoa is on a sabbatical of sorts “…to play in a quadrangular competition in South Africa in June against the Springboks, Scotland and Italy.”)

There’s a well-known saying about rugby, which comes in various versions. The most famous being something like this, in which football = soccer:

football is a gentlemen’s game played by hooligans while rugby is a hooligan’s game played by gentlemen

In true Internet fashion, this is variously attributed (in whole or part) to everyone from Winston Churchill and Oscar Wilde to Kipling (if not others!)

Real rugby buffs have tried to track the quote down. And – as you’d expect – there are a number of blogs devoted to the sport, such as this from Sean Fagan.

I can’t tell how rugby is doing in Northern New York, but it seems increasingly common in Canada. I’m not sure what measurements were used but this source reports: “…global participation has increased by 19% since the last Rugby World Cup in France.”  (That took place in 2007.)

There seems to be growing enthusiasm for rugby among the high school age group, for both genders. Here’s a school paper article out of Montana that speaks to that trend.

It’s most definitely a contact sport, which comes with significant risk of injury, or worse. But many who try it love it. The late actor Richard Harris was known to wax rhapsodic about the sport:

“It belongs to the heart, not the head. Something to be embraced, or spurned – there can be no middle ground. There are those who stare blank-faced when I talk of rugby but others instantly understand my breathless enthusiasm and stomach-churning anxiety. We are the lucky ones.”

Wow. Sport as transformative bliss. And you just thought it was odd English football played without pads.

Canada will meet Tonga in Kingston, ON, Saturday June 8 (details at the very bottom of this article).

In non-Pacific Cup matches later this summer, USA will meet Canada in Charleston, SC Aug 17. Canada will take on the USA in Toronto Aug 24 (both of those are World Cup Qualifying matches.)

Have you tried rugby? What’d you think?

Fri news roundup: border fee, WIC, heroic dogs

Photo: Ivan Walsh, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Photo: Ivan Walsh, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Good Friday to you! (It’s not actually Good Friday, but I hope you’re having a good one.)

Today in the news, North Country Congressman Bill Owens’ amendment to the $38.9 billion Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill for next year is moving forward on the House floor. That amendment basically blocks a study that would look at a border-crossing fee on land between the US and Canada. The possibility of that fee aroused the ire of Owens and Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy, who both argued it would seriously hurt businesses in our border region. In a press release yesterday, Owens said the fee wouldn’t do the government much good either:

Adding a fee to cross the border would cause tremendous damage for the businesses that depend on cross-border tourism and commerce, while doing little to raise revenue for the government.

Owens says he’ll keep fighting against the fee.

In positive news for pregnant ladies and parents of young children, the New York State Department of Health has updated the income guidelines for the federal Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (that’s WIC to you), so that a family of four whose gross annual income is just over $43,500 now qualifies for the federal aid program (here are the new guidelines). That’s according to North Country Now. The program provides vouchers that help families by healthy foods, along with formula, cereal and baby food for families with infants. It also provides nutrition education and breastfeeding support.

And in the world of heroic animals, the Watertown Daily Times reports today that the North Country Kennel Club (which is based in Sandy Creek) is looking to raise $2,800 to outfit area police dogs with bulletproof vests. The vests would go to Watertown’s Police Department, the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Department, and the Fulton PD. The idea was a response to the shooting death of a police German Shepherd in March’s standoff in Herkimer (four people were killed in the shooting.)

In our newsroom today, Brian Mann reports on the state’s plans to take another look at the Adirondack rail corridor. Fans of the seasonal tourism railroad aren’t happy; fans of the idea of remaking the rail trail for various year-round uses, are. And we look at how a proposed two percent cap in state tax assessment increases for agricultural land (follow me?) could impact people in the North Country who aren’t farmers.

Also, we get leisurely with David Sommerstein’s report on his bass fishing expedition; and it’s safe to assume Hammond’s Joyce Wood will be doing a lot of getting leisurely after winning $2 million in the New York Lottery.

And finally,  Colton’s museum starts of its exhibit on the 1940s with an evening of music and stories from that decade. Cool!

Have a wonderful weekend, and as they say, may the good news be yours.

Limited ads approved for CBC radio two

Soon, the place Radio 2 music takes you may be to "a word from their sponsor." Photo: CBC Building, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/35468136281@N01/146850495">Kevin Haggerty</a>, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Soon, where CBC radio 2 music takes you may be to “a word from their sponsors.” Photo: CBC Building, Kevin Haggerty, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

File this under item of note in the world of public broadcasting.

The Canadian Broadcast Corporation (CBC) has been up for a regular license review by Canada’s regulator agency, (deep breath) the Canada Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, more mercifully known as the CRTC.

That’s a fairly large topic, full of complex details and Canada-specific issues. If wanted, here’s a good summary article from the Globe and Mail on how the CBC began – and the many challenges it faces in a multi-media future.

For the purposes of this post, we’ll set most of that big picture aside and just talk about something a lot of us hate: commercials.

This past week the CRTC renewed the CBC’s license for five more years.

More controversially, part of the CRTC renewal decision could be of some significance for public broadcasting on both side of the border. Ads will now be permitted on some CBC radio services. Yes, they’ll be limited in number. But many observers feel a sort of Rubicon just got crossed.

Here’s more from a CRTC press release of May 28th:

Broadcast of advertising for a three-year period

The CBC requested permission to gradually include national advertising on its Radio 2 and Espace Musique radio networks, up to an unlimited quantity during the fourth year of its licence term. The CRTC partially granted this request by allowing advertising to be broadcast on these services for a limited three-year period. The networks may not broadcast more than four minutes of advertising per broadcast hour. In order to minimize the impact on their listeners, the advertising broadcast will have to be consolidated in a maximum of two blocks each hour.

At the end of the three-year period, if the CBC wishes to continue to broadcast advertising on Radio 2 and Espace Musique, it will have to submit a new application to the CRTC. The CBC will have to demonstrate that the advertising has not had an undue adverse effect on advertising markets, that listeners have not been unduly inconvenienced by the advertising, that the level of investment in radio broadcasting has been maintained, and that there has been no reduction in the variety and diversity of programming provided by the Radio 2 and Espace Musique services.

A few more details. Although CBC is largely funded by tax dollars CBC TV already has ads – approved ads anyway – that ship has sailed. (I am having some difficulty establishing when ads were first permitted on CBC TV, do readers know?)

As for radio, CBC radio one is the powerhouse service, with a high number of listeners in many communities, including Ottawa. CBC radio two is the quiet, shadow station. Formerly the place to find classical music, it’s now trying to be more things to more listeners by including contemporary music during drive time – relegating classical to off-peak hours. (Espace Musique is a French language/music service.)

Not that my feelings matter, but I was initially outraged by changes to CBC radio two, feeling the old format wasn’t broken and didn’t need fixing. Well, surprise, surprise. Over time I have changed my mind. I was sure I’d hate the drive time music shows but they’re actually pretty good. (Small, anecdotal evidence, perhaps, that initial outrage isn’t always the best way to gauge change?)

But what about out-and-out commercials on supposedly non-commercial public radio? Camel’s nose and slippery slope cries of alarm abound.

For those who care, here is CBC news coverage of that same ruling. CBC’s long-form interview program As It Happens covered this with comments from CBC President Hubert Lacroix, and a critical view from Wade Rowland. And here’s non-CBC coverage from Maclean’s.

The interest group Friends of CBC issued a press release criticizing the decision:

In choosing to ignore the advice of 93% of the citizens who took the trouble to comment on the CBC’s proposal to place ads on its radio services, the decision sets CBC Radio on a slippery slope.   This is the beginning of the end of the last commercial-free service offered by the CBC, according to the watchdog group Friends of Canadian Broadcasting.

More criticism was offered up from the free-market perspective in a commentary by the Financial Post’s Terence Corcoran:

In its licence decision Tuesday, the CRTC approved a plan by the CBC to introduce the evil force of commercials to Radio 2, one of public broadcasters two radio networks. The CBC, on television and through its aggressive digital Web-based operations, has been in the commercial market for decades, more recently  manipulating and abusing its massive public subsidy to compete with the private sector on the Internet. Radio was the last fig leaf on the CBC’s phony claims to non-commercial integrity, and now it is gone completely.

Long time consumers of public media in the U.S. can easily remember furors over allowing corporate underwriting on PBS, NPR and member stations like NCPR. As a listener, I still wish they weren’t there. But programing has survived. (In the case of small stations like NCPR, local underwriting can even seem homey, a sign of community spirit.)

Limited ads on some CBC radio stations will soon be tried as an experiment. Is it a good one?

Or has a line that should be inviolate just been crossed?

1758 Document hints at a very different North America

Screen shot of 1758 document offered as Lot 66 at June 11 auction in New York City

Screen shot of 1758 document offered as Lot 66 at June 11 Sotheby’s auction in New York City.

There’s a genre of fiction called ‘Alternate history‘.

You know: Abraham Lincoln survived John Wilkes Booth’s assassination attempt or someone managed to kill Hitler before WW II – that sort of thing. Romps that mix what we know did happen with how things could have gone quite differently.

Well, here’s a historical document from 1759 that practically screams ‘write this’.

As reported by Randy Boswel of Postmedia news:

A New York auction house has revealed the discovery of a previously unknown document from a pivotal moment in Canadian history — a hand-written report detailing an “obscure” and startling December 1758 proposal by an unnamed French official to relocate the 60,000 people of New France to Louisiana in the event of a British victory in the Seven Years’ War.

Hmm. If that had happened, the Louisiana Purchase in 1803 would have become less probable. At 4 cents per acre, the total sum of 15 million paid to France was no small chunk of money back in the day. As we all learned in school, that sale enabled the young U.S. to expand westward and incorporate the tremendously important Mississippi River watershed. The Library of Congress calls it the “greatest real estate deal in history”. (Thomas Jefferson basically bought the parts encompassed by the green lines in the map below.)

The 1758 document is among many other items to be offered by Sotheby’s on that date: Fine Books and Manuscripts, including Americana. The estimated price range runs from $100,000 to $150,000 USD.

essay1e_lgI will shamelessly quote from the Sotheby catalog notes, because they are fascinating:

A previously unknown manuscript account of an obscure French project to relocate some 60,000 French inhabitants of Canada to Louisiana during the French and Indian War. This plan was not known to historians until 1954 when Lionel Grouls published a study of another similar, but shorter, manuscript from the Centre des Archives d’Outre-Mer (C11 A, 103), dated 27 December 1758, in Revue d’Histoire de l’Amérique française(vol. VIII [1954]: 97-118).

The anonymous author details the advantages of such a project: increasing the population of Louisiana; making it a stronger colony, capable of withstanding English encroachment; developing the agriculture of the region; and establishing new trade routes and partners. The author also is adamant that the any émigrés must be persuaded to join the project voluntarily because of the personal advantages to them—they are not to be coerced or forced to move. He actually tabulates twenty-seven points that can be used to convince the settlers to abandon Canada for Louisiana, and he also speculates that camels might be sent to the settlers in their new southern homeland. The movement of settlers is to be preceded by a military convoy, which will then report on how many people can travel at once, as well as the feasibility of traveling on board vessels across the Great Lakes and down the Mississippi River. The author assumes that the entire project would be paid for by Louis XV, but in addition to the enormous logistical problems this project would have faced, the French treasury simply could not have afforded an expenditure on this scale at that time, and the project never developed beyond the proposal stage.

This manuscript is in a clerical hand, and there is no clue to the identity of the actual author, but some possible authors include Colonel Louis Antoine de Bougainvilledeputy to General Montcalm; Jean Antoine Nicolas François de Capellis, marquis de Capellis, who wrote several “mémoires” about France’s North American colonies; François-Pierre de Vaudreuil, whose brother had been the French colonial governor of Louisiana and of New France.

Convoys of French to sette the American ‘heartland’! (Louisiana was the whole middle of modern-day America back then, not just Louisiana.)

Camels, oh my! Not to mention how different Canada would be, had the French pulled up and left at that time.

OK, these were just proposals on paper. Implausible, never happened.

But still, it’s amusing imagining it playing out.

Cuomo administration gets tough with… Canada?!

Gov. Cuomo at the Battle of Peace Bridge

Cartoonist Marquil depicts NY Gov. Cuomo as a War of 1812 re-enactor.

Some quarrels are real, some are manufactured by press accounts.

What, then, are observers to make of a reported dust-up between New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and Canada?

To be specific, this reported quarrel is taking place between representatives of the Cuomo administration and Canadian members of the Buffalo and Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority, a 10-person board that runs the Peace Bridge.

According the no less than the New York Times,  ”… the administration has all but declared war on a new enemy”. The May 27th article by Danny Hakim goes on to say:

In recent months, Mr. Cuomo’s chief representative to the binational agency that manages the bridge has described his Canadian counterparts, in e-mails he sent to them, as “duplicitous,” criticizing their “deceitful, disrespectful and arrogant behavior.”

“The fact that you ask for ‘mutual respect’ is nothing short of laughable,” the Cuomo representative, William B. Hoyt III, told the Canadians.

The dispute began over efforts to expand the plaza on the New York side of the bridge, with Canadian members of the authority’s board expressing concern about spending far more for land than its appraised value. Things quickly turned personal.

Perhaps in response to the NTY coverage, this is starting to pop up in Canadian media accounts too, as in this 5/28 item from the Vancouver Observer.

It’s an open secret that Andrew Cuomo is being groomed for national office by the Democratic Party, and thus must show off some international-relations chops. He certainly chose a weird way of doing so, and it’ll be difficult for him to come out of this looking good, even if he gets what he wants. “Fighting on the Peace Bridge” is a ready-made attack ad.

The Epoch Times says a 5-5 deadlock occurred at a meeting last Friday and

Cuomo allies last week proposed legislation in Albany to dissolve the Peace Bridge Authority, saying it is no longer a functioning body.

The board is scheduled to meet again June 28.

Meanwhile the NYT reported that last Friday’s meeting  (presumably the same meeting in question?)

…the Americans decided to attend an authority board meeting. But when it came time to take the routine step of approving the minutes from an earlier meeting, they refused.

Clearly, all is not peaceable in that boardroom at present. At least one observer (Matthew Coutts, blogging for the Daily Brew) opined that “…this power struggle could get worse before it gets better.”

Here’s the take from Buffalo, as expressed in a May 26th column by Buffalo News senior Metro columnist Donn Esmonde:

Don’t get me wrong – ideally, what both Cuomo and the bridge authority want would be done yesterday. Talk of a bridge/plaza redo predates the Internet. We desperately need a consensus-reached, community-vetted plan for a sensible U.S. plaza. But I think Cuomo’s grab-the-reins move is a major miscalculation. It is borne of equal parts arrogance, Cuomo’s unfamiliarity with Canada’s process-devoted culture and an understandable reluctance by Canadian authority members to let an outsider into the engine room. Reaching across the Niagara River is a serious Cuomo overreach. I don’t see where Cuomo has much leverage. In New York, he can rally allies and coerce enemies with threats or rewards. But his juice stops at the Canadian border.

So, is this a clash of bureaucratic cultures? Personalities? Or both?

Ash tree news: linking tree health to human health?

Ash trees are under threat in many areas around North America thanks to the emerald ash borer. A march of that insect threat continues in New York State as well, according to this account from David Fugura at Syracuse.com:

With the confirmation of EAB in Delaware and Otsego counties, New York now has 15 counties where EAB has been found. Most of the infested areas are small and localized, while more than 98 percent of New York’s forests and communities are not yet infested.

NCPR has covered this topic for years, and the outlook for ash trees has not been terribly hopeful. Here’s a Sept. 2012 map of affected and quarantined counties in NYS:

(image from the NEw York Invasive Species Clearinghouse, Cornell cooperative extension invasive species program)

(image from the New York Invasive Species Clearinghouse, Cornell cooperative extension invasive species program)

Apparently, the common ash in parts of Europe and England is also struggling with Chalara fraxinea fungus, which causes dieback. That disease threat has spread to Wales (which is easy enough on a contiguous land mass). Sadly, that has also hopped the surrounding sea and is now reported in Ireland.

Ash trees are a classic element of landscape and culture in England and Wales. (Indeed, even in far-off Hawaii I was taught the Welsh folk tune “The Ash Grove” back in elementary school.) The UK’s Gaurdian called the situation there “a disaster in the making“.

Matters do look grim for the poor ash tree.

Recent news reports add a wrinkle to that dour outlook: there may be some relationship between higher rates of human mortality and threats to tree health, according to a study published in February by the American Journal of Preventative Medicine: The Relationship Between Trees and Human Health: Evidence from the Spread of the Emerald Ash Borer

As summarized by an article in the Washington Post:

A study in February’s American Journal of Preventive Medicine showed that deaths from cardiovascular and lower respiratory illnesses rose as ash trees vanished. The study found that the EAB’s effects can be linked to more than 21,000 deaths — an additional 24 deaths per 100,000 people every year, a 10 percent increase in mortality for those diseases.

Is there a causal link? Well, that awaits further study. It is generally understood, though, that healthy trees do contribute to a healtier environment for living things, including humans.

Ash makes up a significant percentage of trees in the Ottawa area, perhaps as much as 25%. Most or all are expected to be lost over time to the current insect threat. The Ottawa Citizen’s Tom Spears wrote about this recently, in light of the study in question:

The greatest jump in deaths was in communities where people had higher-than-average incomes and more education, which are often the places with the most trees.

One Ottawa physician says this is more evidence for protecting the ash trees.

“You want them because they are beautiful, natural cleaners (of air) and protectors of us,” said Dr. Curtis Lavoie of the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario.

“I see a lot of asthma, a lot of emphysema, a lot of pneumonia” as an emergency physician, he said. “It’s on the rise, and I think it’s largely related to pollution.”

It may be that healthy trees in general – any trees – will provide a protective benefit. Which raises some questions. Should planners make a special effort to replace lost ash trees with an equivalent number of other tree species? Or is this a bigger lesson? Perhaps all trees, all species, need conditions that will keep them in continued health.

If so, that’s going to be a tall order.

I am put in mind of the old saying: “The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The next best time is now.”