Posts Tagged ‘Cuomo’

Friday news roundup: casinos, rural health care, farmers markets

Photo: Government Press Office, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Photo: Government Press Office, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Happy Friday! As we’re fond of saying here at NCPR, it’s the best day of the workweek. Today for your delectation from the newsroom we have some great stories. Julie Grant has reported extensively on the troubles EJ Noble hospital’s had over the last year or so, and this week she’s had two stories updating the situation now that the hospital has reopened and reorganized. In the first she reported on the hospital’s efforts to get patients to return; and today she’s reporting on how people in the tiny Adirondack village of Harrisville are dealing with the hospital’s closure of one of the its rural clinics there.

David Sommerstein has a very springlike Heard Up North today on a “Gentleman’s Runabout” in the Thousand Islands; and Brian Mann and Todd Moe worked together on a really fascinating treatment of an oratorio celebrating an als0-really-fascinating chapter in Adirondack history: the Timbuctoo colony of freed slaves near Lake Placid.

So what else is going on? Well, North Country Now is reporting that North Country Assemblywoman Addie Russell has voted to establish task force to combat human trafficking (here’s David Sommerstein’s recent piece on human trafficking in New York state.)

Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced yesterday that he wants to build three new casinos upstate, but that announcement comes with a caveat for Native casinos, including the just-expanded Akwesasne Mohawk Casino in Hogansburg (more from Your News Now on the expansion.) WWNY-TV reports the governor’s saying if the state’s Native casinos don’t reach agreements with the state in coming months, they could be facing competition from non-Native casinos. Apparently if the tribes’ agreements with the state are “in good standing”, new casino rules won’t look to put new casinos near them; but if that’s not the case they may try to site new casinos near Native casinos. The issues at hand are things like revenue sharing with the state.

And if you’re a farmers market vendor, GardenShare and Cornell Cooperative Extension have some information for you. They’ll be hosting a free training webinar next Wednesday at the Potsdam Public Library computer center for vendors in St. Lawrence County who want to be able to accept WIC checks this season at the market. Executive Director Aviva Gold said in a statement quoted in North Country Now that given the number of women who receive WIC services in the county, “this is a substantial income opportunity for our local farmers.” You can reserve a spot by emailing office@gardenshare.org.

 

 

Is rampant Democratic corruption Andrew Cuomo’s problem?

With word of Senator John Sampson’s arrest on corruption and embezzlement charges, it’s impossible to ignore the sense that New York’s Democratic Party is in need of a serious intervention.

Yes, Republicans have been vulnerable to the temptations of sleaze, but consider the Democratic perp-walk list over just the last five years:

Senator John Sampson, Senator Malcolm Smith, Senator Pedro Espada, Senator Efrain Gonzalez ,Senator Shirley Huntley, Senator Carl Kruger, Senator Hiram Monserrate, Assemblyman Eric Stevenson, Assemblyman Nelson Castro, Assemblyman William Boyland, Assemblyman Anthony Seminerio, Assemblywoman Diane Gordon, New York City Councilman Larry Seabrook, Comptroller Alan Hevesi, and Governor Eliot Spitzer.

That’s a long list of men and women, many in positions of highest leadership and authority within the state’s Democratic Party, indicted or convicted or resigned because of illegal behavior — and again, this is in the last half-decade alone.

Our Albany correspondent, Karen DeWitt, is reporting that there is new information about other Democratic lawmakers who may be in the cross-hairs for Federal investigators, because they were secretly recorded by Sen. Huntley, who wore a wire.

Those recorded by Huntley include “Senate Democratic colleagues Eric Adams, Jose Peralta, Ruth Hassel Thompson and Velmanette Montgomery, along with a City Councilman Ruben Wills,   the former spokesman for the Senate Democrats, Curtis Taylor, and Melvin Lowe, identified in the court papers as a former political consultant and associate of State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman.”

All of these people are innocent until proven guilty, but there’s a lot of blood (and a lot of sharks) in those waters.

Which shouldn’t come as any surprise.  There have been signs of trouble percolating out of Albany for years.  This from the New York Daily News:

[John] Sampson’s tenure as leader was characterized by chaotic sessions, bloated payrolls and an almost never-ending stream of controversies. It was eventually revealed that under Sampson’s command, the Senate overspent its budget by at least $7 million.

A state Inspector General’s report in late 2010 blasted Sampson and other Senate Democrats for steering the multi-billion-dollar contract to operate a racino at Aqueduct to the politically connected Aqueduct Entertainment Group.

Some Democrats will argue that this is a bipartisan issue, that systemic reforms are needed that will keep all of Albany’s politicos from burying their snouts in the corruption trough.  Fair enough.

But it is increasingly difficult to ignore the sense that a Tammany Hall style culture now pervades the state’s Democratic Party, and it is even more difficult to ignore the fact that Andrew Cuomo has done nothing to restore order to the party that he leads.

Granted, from 2006 until 2010, Cuomo was obligated to follow a largely non-partisan track as state Attorney General.

But even in that role, it’s hard to imagine that calls for tough anti-corruption reforms within the Democratic movement would have been considered out of bounds.

As governor, meanwhile, there is little evidence that Cuomo has taken the steps necessary to purge the Democratic machine of those who would dip their hands in the till.

He has also failed to implement the kinds of internal checks and balances that might have identified and eliminated problem candidates, or create competitive primaries to challenge entrenched politicos.

Instead, he has distanced himself from the Democratic Party, attempting to portray himself as a kind of post-partisan governor, floating above the grime of Albany.

I’m not sure that works anymore.  Strong leadership starts at home and within your own movement. The Cuomo family is deeply identified with New York’s Democratic culture and right now that culture appears increasingly toxic.

It’s also worth pointing out that Democratic corruption appears to be thwarting the will of average voters in the state.

Over the last five years, New Yorkers have cast their ballots in such a way as to create a Democratic majority in both chambers of the legislature — only to have their desires thwarted by Democratic bungling and malfeasance.

This means that laws, policies and programs that a majority of New Yorkers support are being derailed, not by sincere and ethical Republican opposition, but by crooks within the governor’s party.

If Cuomo steps up to the next political level, his record in New York state will almost certainly include this spreading of stain of indictments, wire-taps, and money changing hands in alleyways.

He’ll either be seen as a guy who ignored the swamp in his own backyard, or the guy who moved decisively to help clean it up.

Cuomo: Not enough votes (yet) for Women’s Reproductive Health Act

Gov. Cuomo, delivering his State of the State address in Jan., 2013. Photo: Gov. Cuomo’s office via Flickr

At a press conference today, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo conceded to reporters that he doesn’t have the votes in the Senate to pass his Women’s Reproductive Health Act. But he says he’s still trying.

Reporter Karen Dewitt asked the governor about the situation, given that state Sen. Dean Skelos has said there’s “no need” to bring the bill to a vote at all. Here’s what he said:

The topic will come to a head, the women are working very hard, the women’s groups are working very hard, and it’s going to be a topic that has to be addressed.

I believe it should come up for a vote…first I believe we should get it done, and I also believe that people have a right to know where elected officials stand on those important issues, so I’m going to be working very hard, again, to bring it to the forefront, and to get a vote and to get it passed.

I understand Sen. Skelos is opposed to it, he has been not just this year, he’s been opposed to the choice vote for many, many years. I understand that.

Cuomo said he’s NOT conceding defeat on this.

We are working on language, it’s not a question of language, it’ a question of language that can garner enough votes to pass, right? It’s not language for the sake of language…it’s a bill that can pass. And we do not yet have language for a bill where we have identified enough votes with certainty that could pass.

So it looks like the Women’s Reproductive Health Act for New York this year is still somewhat in doubt (here’s the original language of the Assembly bill, from January; as you may have surmised the Senate bill language is still in process) — and this after Cuomo gave such a rousing introduction to the act in January’s State of the State message in January.

The act’s 10-point agenda includes (quoting from YNN’s Capitol Tonight)

pay equity, curtailing sexual harassment and employment, credit and lending discrimination, strengthening human trafficking laws, ending housing discrimination of domestic abuse victims and blocking pregnancy discrimination in the workplace.

It also includes measures to strengthen the state’s abortion laws, which have been a major sticking point with Republican legislators.

So it’s not clear what’s going to happen with this bill in the future, but there seems to be something of an impasse. We shall see. More on this story tomorrow morning on the 8 O’clock Hour.

 

Morning read: Minimum wage, maximum tension

Advocates for New York state’s hungry rally at the Capitol in November of 2012 for an increase in the state’s minimum wage. Will they get their wish? Photo: Karen DeWitt

Good morning! While some of us may feel that all outside-of-bed activities should cease until the temperature breaks 10 above, there’s been quite a lot going on this week.

This morning, Joanna Richards reported that Fort Drum servicemembers have mixed feelings about Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta’s decision to lift the ban on women in combat. Some say it’s not as big a deal as people think, given the changed nature of combat in recent years.

Others have the concerns that have been around for a long time about this — will women soldiers be able to hold their own? Will they be able to carry their own stuff? Will their presence complicate relationships between “battle buddies”?

Interesting stuff.

Also today NCPR launched its new Prison Time Media Project, with an epic story from Brian Mann on the history of the Rockefeller Drug Laws. It’s worth checking out, as is the project’s new blog.

But enough about us, let’s get down to Albany, where the temperature is a balmy 6 degrees. Journalists, organizations and others are still parsing Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s budget address to see how it applies to the things in which they’re the most interested, and one interesting development is that Cuomo’s decision to make an increase in the minimum wage from $7.25 to $8.75 part of the budget may mean that the rise could be more likely to become law.

Not surprisingly, the minimum wage increase idea is controversial, and people (by which I mean non-politicians) feel strongly about it. The Watertown Daily Times reports this morning that the idea is getting a “mixed reception” in that area, with owners of local businesses expressing a lot of concerns about where the money’s going to come from to pay for the increase, and at least one (Jreck Subs franchisee Peter J. Whitmore) suggesting he’d raise prices. “It would be absolutely devastating to us.”

Particularly in Watertown, where the cost of living is higher than in many other parts of the North Country, employees say the raise would be helpful, and would in some cases help people get out of untenable housing situations.

Dairy farmers would be affected by the increase as well — Douglas W. Shelmidine, who owns a large farm in Ellisburg, says the increase would “really challenge us to give opportunities to those who don’t have experience, or even kids.” In other words, if he has to pay people more, he wants better-trained, more experienced people.

Generally, the minimum wage is a vastly complicated issue and one in which most hold strong and often-intractable views. With both businesses and employees struggling, and people holding a huge array of different opinions about what stimulates the economy, what chills it, and what these terms should even mean, it’s unlikely these questions will be resolved even by data coming from any future minimum wage increase — there are just too many factors to consider, and, frankly, too much confirmation bias at work.

But maybe I’m being cynical. What do you think?

Cuomo budget address: how’s he going to pay for that?

Image from Governor Andrew Cuomo’s presentation, highlighting education. So how’s he going to pay for his plans for expanded schooling? Photo: NYS Governor’s Office

3:45 p.m. You can listen to the full audio from Gov. Cuomo’s budget address here.

2:59 p.m. The governor is still speaking, but reactions are already coming into our newsroom (two so far) This from a press release from the Last Store on Main Street Coalition, an organization which represents those against the sales of wine in grocery stores:

“With his Executive Budget today, Governor Cuomo has demonstrated once again that he recognizes the best way to lift the New York wine industry and create jobs is to invest in a consumer-based marketing program, which is exactly what he does with his $2 million Taste NY program. The more New Yorkers understand the high quality wine made right here at home, the more they drink it and the more they buy it.” More wine!

In another press release, Mike Durant, State Director of National Federation of Independent Business/New York (it seems the small-business-type organizations were right on this) had more mixed feelings. While pleased that the governor “maintains the theme of fiscal responsibility continues to right-size state government and closes the current budget gap while rejecting any new tax increases.  Financially, this budget proposal is a continuation of existing efforts to rebuild New York’s fiscal health and encourage sustained economic growth.”

Durant was less pleased with the governor’s minimum wage plan–in fact, he was “deeply disappointed”, saying his group “strongly urge[s] the Governor and legislative leaders to focus on additional areas of regulatory reform and cost reduction for small business.”

This is just the first trickle of what’s sure to be a flood of reaction, but there you have it. Complete coverage of the address tomorrow morning on the 8 O’clock Hour.

1:50

As I write we are mere minutes from one of the most exciting moments of the year for New York state residents, Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s budget address.

All right, maybe not—while the budget address may lack some of the flair and showmanship of the State of the State address earlier this month, it’s to a great extent where the rubber hits the road, policy-wise – it’s the moment when Gov. Cuomo has to explain how he’s going to pay for the ambitious plans he described in that address, even as State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli is saying New York’s not taking in quite as much as he’d anticipated.

One big question is how the state’s going to pay for the expansion of learning time in schools that Cuomo proposed, describing his priorities thusly: “When it comes to education, I have two words, more and better.”  

Cuomo’s said the budget plan’s not likely to have a lot of surprises, and he’s expected to talk about how the state will fund plans to support upstate jobs programs and tourism, and how his administration plans to keep growth in state spending under two percent. Mandate relief is also on the agenda, or the rundown, if you will.

For much, much more detail, here’s a link to the briefing book for the speech, so you can see even before Cuomo says it what the plan is (PDF). We’ll have full coverage of the address tomorrow morning on the 8 O’clock hour; meanwhile, you can listen to the address on our air or at ncpr.org, and you can watch it here. Happy budgeting!

Breaking: Cuomo says NY will miss fracking deadline

Fracking pipes. Photo: Emma Jacobs

Governor Andrew Cuomo today confirmed that New York will miss the November 29th deadline to finish its health review on hydro-fracking.  Speaking on 1300-AM, WGDJ Radio in Albany, Cuomo said a new health panel would not be realistically able to complete its review by next week, “We want a proper process. We want it expeditiously as possible. I don’t see how we get it done by next week.”

Hydro-fracking is a technique in which water, sand and chemicals are injected underground at high pressure to fracture the rock and release natural gas.

Environmental groups have warned that hydro-fracking would pose health hazards, particularly in the gas-rich Marcellus Shale that extends across New York’s Southern Tier.

It’s been less than two weeks since the state Department of Health announced the names of three outside experts to assist in reviewing the fracking regulations, proposed by the Department of Environmental Conservation.  The experts will advise on the potential health impacts of hydro-fracking.

The missed deadline means that there is the possibility the state will have to conduct another round of public hearings on fracking.

The oil and gas industry has expressed its frustration at the delay in the process.   The industry has pushed Cuomo to allow fracking, saying it would be a boon for New York’s economy.

Cuomo has said the health review is not a step backward toward approving regulations.  Some legal experts say the state could avoid future litigation by completing a health review before issuing fracking permits.

The state is expected to seek a 90-day extension of the proposed regulations.  One of the experts on the health panel told Gannett’s Albany Bureau last week that they were charged with completing their review by mid-February—which would fall within that time period.

Is New York dodging important legal precedents in the Adirondacks?

Earlier this month, New York state abruptly dropped its appeal of a 2011 court ruling that required the Adirondack Park Agency and the Department of Environmental Conservation to classify the water and lake bed of Lows Lake — a popular paddling destination near Tupper Lake — as “wilderness.”

APA spokesman Keith McKeever issued a statement arguing that the legal victory for environmental groups was a narrow one and doesn’t set a precedent for other parts of the Park.

“The decision is narrowly defined to Lows Lake and is not applicable or precedent setting for the rest of the Adirondacks,” he said in an email to NCPR.

There are pretty clear signals that the state dropped the case in order to avoid seeing it move to a higher court, where a clear, Park-wide legal precedent would have been set.

Fred Monroe, head of the Adirondack Local Government Review Board, says he was told by top state officials that this was the legal strategy.

“They said their reasoning was that this was a lower court [decision] and it doesn’t have binding affect throughout [the Park] but if they appealed it and got an adverse ruling there, then it would be binding,” Monroe recounted.

He says state officials urged his group not to complain about the decision to drop the appeal, because state officials were working to avoid a Park-wide legal determination that might have expanded restrictions on motorized recreation and other activities.

Green groups think their victory in this case has already establish a precedent for lakes and rivers across the Park.  I don’t know who is right here.

But a clear precedent in this case might resolve a long-running dispute over interpretations of the State Land Master Plan, settling arguments over the management of lakes and rivers that have plagued communities, state officials and environmental groups for decades.

If state officials disliked the final ruling, and any precedents it set, they would have a clear recourse of going to Albany and asking the legislature to rewrite the law.

Same goes for local government leaders or environmental groups. That process would mean a healthy public debate, and a clear democratic solution.

Instead — if the state is deliberately avoiding clear legal precedents — we’re left with more legal muddles, more gray zones, more reading of tea leaves by state officials and interpretations that can change from one administration to the next.

(Management of Lows Lake has been a political football for years, with the DE and the Park Agency wrangling, sometimes publicly, over what kinds of recreation should be allowed.)

Indeed, some observers have suggested the this kind of deliberate ambiguity is already making it difficult for environmental officials to manage the Adirondacks.

In an essay for the Adirondack Almanack, the journalist Phil Brown documented questions that emerged as stumbling blocks during the Adirondack Club and Resort decision earlier this year.

“Its unclear whether there is a meaningful distinction between primary and secondary uses [of resource management lands],” Brown wrote, referring to zoning classifications for private land in the Park.

It’s unclear whether the language allowing residential development ‘on substantial acreages or in small clusters’ is a mandate.  It’s unclear what ‘substantial acreages’ and “small clusters” mean.”

Brown went on to write, “The Adirondack Club and Resort is the largest development approved by the APA. It’s a shame we didn’t have answers to all these questions before the decision was made.”

The lawsuit filed over the Tupper Lake resort case might settle some of those ambiguities, adding definition and clarity to Park rules.

But the state has asked a judge to dismiss that suit, as well, in a fashion that would avoid any conclusive interpretations.

We have seen this go the other way in recent years, with clear legal precedents being set in cases involving navigation rights on Adirondack rivers and APA oversight over farms.

The Lows Lake case, if pursued to the higher court, might have accomplished the same, giving everyone in the Park a clearer understanding of the rules shaping management of the Park’s waters.

Regional council does North Country “proud”

Our own Ellen Rocco was in Albany yesterday with the group representing the North Country  at the regional economic development competition being run by the governor’s office.

It pits eight regions of the state against each other for economic development aid from the state. The four winning regions each get $40 million, the others split $40 million. Big stakes.

Ellen was there with two other people involved in one of the projects selected for presentation to the panel of judges: North Country Pastured, which hopes to get a mobile poultry processing facility going in the St. Lawrence Valley.

Others on the travel team:   Kevin Elkin of Elkin Tree Service in Indian lake ( a passionate broadband proponent) and representatives of a company based in Syracuse and Ogdensburg that’s working on advanced LED lighting technology. Leading were co-chairs Garry Douglas of the North Country Chamber of Commerce in Plattsburgh, Clarkson University President Tony Collins, and Kate Fish, a North Country Council member representing the Adirondack North Country Association.

Here’s a link to the website with all the regions’ full videos. (Don’t worry…you should be able to fast forward to various bits.)

The co-chairs did the presentation, and each of the judges had questions, with interjections from time to time.

The big takeaway – “We think we did the North Country proud,” says Ellen. She says all the panelists said the North Country presentation stood out, partly because this region’s council was the only team to bring actual people who could talk about their own projects. And the visuals were smart and looked good…not your typical “death by Power Point” presentation.

We’ll see, soon. A decision is expected Dec. 14.

Looking presidential, Gov. Cuomo?

So let me start with a modern reality that many In Box readers will hate:  disasters are political events.

From President George Bush’s handling of Katrina to Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s approach to last year’s Christmas snowstorm in Manhattan, elected officials are graded on their responses.

Do they look authoritative?  Do they get results?  Do they have a common touch, maintaining control of fast-moving events while also showing one-on-one compassion for people who are suffering?

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani was catapulted into the highest tier of American politics by managing to do all those things effectively following the 9/11 attacks.

Which brings us to Irene and Andrew Cuomo.  During his visit yesterday to Keene, it wasn’t difficult to see how people are gauging his leadership so far.  He drew hugs and praise everywhere he went.

Asked by NCPR about the Democratic governor’s performance, Republican state Senator Betty Little gave him an “A+.”  She later upgraded her report card to “A++”.

So far, at least, it’s hard to fault Gov. Cuom’s get-it-done performance.  Even before Irene hit, he marshaled a smaller, leaner state government and put it to work.

The optics yesterday were just about right, too.  The governor wore a pair of work boots that didn’t look too new, or too shiny.  He wore a pair of lived-in blue jeans that actually fit kind of clumsily.  You know, the way regular guys dress.

He also has the common sense to avoid Michael Dukakis-style theatrics.  No climbing clumsily onto a backhoe or donning a fireman’s hat.

It’s fair to point out that there was a time, not so long ago, when Andrew Cuomo didn’t show this kind of confidence.  In 2002, during his first gubernatorial campaign, he stumbled badly, appearing over-eager and impulsive.

His 2005 divorce from Kerry Kennedy suggested a breach between two of America’s political dynasties and drew oceans of nasty ink in New York City’s tabloid press.  “Nightmare in Camelot,” read one headline.

That all feels a long time ago.

Of course, it’s not a sure thing that Cuomo’s adroit handling of the state’s fiscal crisis and his confident leadership after Irene will open a path to the White House.  That road is never straight or sure, as the governor’s father could tell him.

But in 2016, the Democratic nomination will be wide open and Cuomo will be 59 years old.  It’s hard to imagine that his name won’t be on a very short list of top contenders.

So what do you think?  Are you satisfied with the governor’s handling of Irene?  Do you think he has higher political aspirations?  As always, your comments welcome.

Cuomo signs new “power for jobs”

Governor Cuomo signed the new, permanent version of the popular Power for Jobs program into law today.

From the Associated Press:

Cuomo signed the bill at Ascension Industries in North Tonawanda, north of Buffalo, on Thursday.

Recharge New York gives businesses like Ascension access to low-cost power, with the idea that they’ll use the savings to retain and create jobs. Unlike Power for Jobs, it allows businesses to enter into seven-year contracts, rather than for a single year. Companies are awarded contracts based on capital investment commitments, job retention and creation and other factors.

Dozens of businesses in the North  Country use the program.

State Senator Patty Ritchie took some credit for Recharge NY’s passage as a co-sponsor and member of the Senate Energy Committee.  She called Recharge NY “a dramatic improvement” over Power For Jobs.

The real battle was in the Assembly, where chamber leaders had been reluctant to support the legislation last session.