Posts Tagged ‘economy’

Ogdensburg wants news about the psych center; the state’s not talking

New York State Office of Mental Health Acting Commissioner Kristin Woodlock and her team listening to speakers from the North Country at today's meeting at the St. Lawrence Psychiatric Center in Ogdensburg. Photo: Julie Grant

New York State Office of Mental Health Acting Commissioner Kristin Woodlock and her team listening to speakers from the North Country at today’s meeting at the St. Lawrence Psychiatric Center in Ogdensburg. Photo: Julie Grant

There’s a lot of speculation out there about the future of the St. Lawrence Psychiatric Center in Ogdensburg. The NY Office of Mental Health is considering closing a number of state hospitals, saying that at 24, New York has more than 3 times that of any other state.

Acting Mental Health Commissioner Kristin Woodlock visited Ogdensburg last week, as part of her “listening tour” of hospitals, and she got an earful from the community – including concerns about the possible loss of care for patients, and of more than 500 jobs.

Woodlock said a decision could come as early as Monday. But Monday came and went without word from the state, and people want to know what’s going happen.

The Watertown Daily Times speculates that “no news could be good news” for the Ogdensburg facility. Robert McNeil, chairman of the St. Lawrence River Valley Redevelopment Agency said, “I’m optimistic.” He said the Commissioner’s visit was a success, “There was a lot of good testimony there.”

I spoke with Ben Rosen, spokesman for the NY Mental Health Office, this afternoon.  He wouldn’t give any information about what or when we might hear from the state, despite the community’s anxiety.  It sounds like no news isn’t necessarily good or bad.  It’s just no news. We’ll keep you posted as soon as we hear anything…

Is the Adirondack Park an economic engine?

Can places like Mt. Baker help draw business and prosperity to villages like Saranac Lake? Photo: Brian Mann

Can places like Mt. Baker help draw business and prosperity to villages like Saranac Lake? Photo: Brian Mann

I was talking yesterday with Saranac Lake Mayor Clyde Rabideau, who was unveiling his village’s new “6er” program, designed to convince people to come check out the cool little mountains that ring his community.

“I talk to people on the trail, which I often do and I ask them if they know about Saranac Lake and most of them don’t.  So this is a way to introduce Saranac Lake and our beautiful mountains to that community.”

That community is the small army of hikers and outdoorspeople — many of them affluent and willing to spend a few bucks while visiting the mountains — that flow out of Boston, Montreal, New York City and other population hubs each weekend.

The interesting thing here is that more and more local leaders seem to be embracing the idea mountains and hiking trails and paddling spots can be a draw and an economic lifeline.

When I first came to the Park a dozen or so years ago, I would often hear elected officials grousing about outdoorspeople.

The general assumption was that they didn’t spend much money or stop at local businesses.

These days, I hear a different sort of thinking:

The idea now is that the marketing needs to appeal to potential visitors and local businesses have to offer products and services that this kind of traveler wants to pay for.

Hikers and paddlers may not spend money in the same way as fishermen and snowmobilers, but they’re still good potential customers.

But getting that formula right, translating more trailheads and boat launches into local prosperity, clearly isn’t easy.

The modern Adirondacks is reaching the half-century mark and a lot of communities are still taking baby steps to try to integrate their marketing, and their business opportunities, with the wild lands and recreation opportunities that surround them.

So here’s my question:  Wherever you are in the Adirondacks, do you see the hiking, paddling, climbing and camping opportunities around you as an economic engine?

Are the public lands and open space that surround your community doing good things for local merchants and workers?  If not, why not?

And what about you folks who visit the Park?  Do you spend a few dollars when you pass through on your way to the trailhead?  Are you finding the services that you’re willing to crack your wallet for?

Comments, as always, welcome below.

Thurs news roundup: FEMA buyouts, economic development, fishing

Photo: Drake Goodman, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Photo: Drake Goodman, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Hello hello hello! A lot from our newsroom this morning. Julie Grant reports on the ongoing questions about the St. Lawrence Psychiatric Center in Ogdensburg: At a forum yesterday at the center, Acting Director of the New York State Office of Mental Health Kristin Woodlock said the state’s moving away from inpatient care. It seems likely that at least some of New York’s 24 psychiatric hospitals will close; Woodlock says the state won’t be making announcements about which ones until early next week.

In Essex County, FEMA is granting about $3.5 million to buy out people whose homes were substantially damaged by Tropical Storm Irene in 2011. A New York prosecutor says Assemblyman Vito Lopez’ alleged sexual harassment of several female staff members, while “alarming”, wasn’t a crime.

And if you love flea markets (I know I do!), you’ll be pleased to know that a third opened yesterday in the Canton-Potsdam area. This one’s in the old Jubilee Plaza off Main Street in Canton. Our own cub reporter-slash-intern Josh Cameron was there and filed a lovely Heard Up North.

In other news today, the co-chairs of the North Country Regional Economic Development Council were in Albany yesterday for the beginning of the next round of competition for economic development funding from the state. As North Country Now reports, our region’s done well in the first two rounds of REDC giving, with almost $200 million going to the region for various economic development projects.

And in the world of leisure, in preparation for this summer’s Bassmaster Elite Series Evan Williams Bourbon Showdown August 8-11 in Waddington (and breathe…), the St. Lawrence County Chamber of Commerce is holding a couple informational sessions:

On June 4, 6 p.m. – 8 p.m. at the community room at Potsdam town Hall, people interested in going to the tournament, sponsoring, vending, advertising, or volunteering can find out more about that (RSVP at (315) 274-9000). On June 12 at the community room in the Village of Potsdam, a marketing specialist will lead a three-hour session (starting at 1 p.m.) called “The Business of Bassmaster,” for business owners who’ll be dealing with visiting anglers. That class is limited to 25 people, and it’s free. Register at (315) 386-4000.

Arctic Council news – and why it matters

Photo: Linnea Nordström, from the Arctic Council press kit

Photo: Linnea Nordström, from the Arctic Council’s Kiruna, Sweden meeting press kit

Canada and the U.S. are among the small number of nations that directly border the Arctic region. It’s a short list of just eight that includes Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden and Russia.

World-wide interest over the transportation and resource potential of the Arctic is growing by leaps and bounds. The stakes are high – especially for the area’s ecological health and actual inhabitants of that cross-border region.

So here’s a round-up of news related to something called the Arctic Council, the body that tries to set and regulate policy for the Arctic.

This week, leaders from many nations will gather in Kiruna, Sweden for an  important session of the Arctic Council. The council’s rotating leadership will pass from Sweden to Canada.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry will attend. The New York Times published two op-ed this week about why the subject matters. The first “Northern Beacon” was penned by Sweden’s foreign minister, Carl Bildt, who says:

…when the Arctic Council meets in Kiruna in northern Sweden in the next few days, it is a rare example of a framework set up to deal with events well before they really start to happen, thus making it possible to shape events rather than reacting to things that have already gone wrong.

The second op-ed “Hands Across the Melting Ice” was written by a trio of Arctic experts who caution that Wednesday’s “ministerial meeting of the council in Sweden will face urgent issues dealing with the environment, shipping and governance.”

Science Daily says a main concern is the fragile region’s vulnerability to spills or other ecological upsets.

This Toronto Star article “Canada to take helm of Arctic Council beginning Wednesday” discusses the internal and external implications of Canada returning to a 2-year revolving post last held back in 1998. According to the Star:

Leona Aglukkaq, Harper’s minister in charge of northern economic development, did not respond to an interview request. But she told The Canadian Press that Ottawa’s focus on development — including the creation of an arctic business forum — won’t distract from other priorities.

“What I’m proposing is a trade show forum, a business forum of Arctic to Arctic, an opportunity for private industry to exchange information on best practices on permafrost, on shipping, all of that,” she told The Canadian Press.

British Columbia based Tyee had more on this topic “Business to have role in Arctic debates, says Aglukkaq

Aglukkaq — an Inuk from Gjoa Haven, Nunavut — said it’s time the council addressed the immediate concerns of northerners.

“We can do science and research but if we’re going to make fully informed decisions we have to ask industry how are we doing? I feel we have to close that gap.”

The resource rush is already changing many Arctic communities.

Writing about “Arctic Council heads to Kiruna next week” the Norway-based Barents Observer says the northern Swedish town of Kiruna exemplifies some of these forces of change: resource extraction, toursim and the needs of traditional people.

Today, the underground mine in Kiruna—the largest of its kind in the world—produces about 76,000 tons of ore every day, according to the LKAB website. Or, enough to fill up a 12-story building.

But Kiruna is becoming increasingly well known for more than what it digs out of the ground. It neighbours the Esrange Space Centre, a rocket range and research centre. It has a healthy tourism industry and well known hotels. It’s driving distance to several protected areas, including Abisko national park. And of course, the area it occupies is part of the traditional home of the Sami people, who have raised major concerns about the impact of increased activity—iron mining in particular—on the grazing range of the reindeer they depend on.

According to the UK’s Guardian a key question being discussed is “…whether to allow 14 countries including China and India as well as the European Union a say in deciding the future of the region by granting them observer status in the Arctic Council”.

 The article describe the debate thusly:

Nordic countries would like to internationalise the Arctic; Russia and Canada, which control more territory in the region, are opposed. Obama, it turns out, may still be on the fence.

Looking for what I’ll call local views on the Council’s summit this week, I found this from Nunatsiaq on line:

[MLAs = Members of the Legislative Assembly]

Nunavut MLAs say they don’t want the Arctic Council to admit the European Union into their international forum as an observer and they want Canada to “firmly, publicly and vigorously oppose the European Union’s application for permanent observer status at the Arctic Council.”

The EU’s ban on things like seal pelts is unpopular in Canadian native and northern communities. Here’s more on that:

The EU ban on seal products, which came into effect Aug. 20, 2010, offers an exemption to furs hunted traditionally by Inuit from Canada and Greenland, but bars them from large-scale commerce in skins, oils or meat in its member nations. It’s still not clear how this exemption would work and if any producers in Canada or Greenland will ever use it.

Hudson Bay MLA Alan Rumbolt said that because of the seal products ban, people in Sanikiluaq are having trouble providing for their families, and he commended his colleagues for standing up and supporting the May 9 motion asking for the EU to be denied observer status at the Arctic Council.

Major changes have already come to the Arctic with more on the way. The shape of future change will largely be decided through decisions made by the Arctic Council.

By the way, if you are deeply interested in this week’s sessions in Kiruna, some of them will be streamed on line, including the main May 15th session.

Help wanted: Canada seeking (some) skilled labor

Like to drive five screens from your Macbook? Canada is looking for a few interactive media developers. Software engineers?--not so much. Photo: Julien Meddah, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Like to drive five screens from your Macbook? Canada is looking for a few interactive media developers. Software engineers?–not so much. Photo: Julien Meddah, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Need work? Got skills? Willing to try life in Canada?

Well, Canada’s federal government has opened a skilled labor program for  “…to 24 eligible occupations, in addition to applicants with a qualifying job offer or those applying under the PhD stream“.

According to this government website Federal Skilled Workers

are chosen as permanent residents based on their ability to settle in Canada and take part in our economy. We assess them on their:

* English and/or French skills,

* education,

* work experience, and

* other factors that have been shown to help them prosper in Canada.

Categories of skills sought include: many types of engineers, land surveyors, various medical specialists and industrial technicians or mechanics. Computer engineers, programmers and “interactive media developers” are wanted, but not software engineers or designers. For all that it’s a long long list, it’s still not one that includes most unemployed workers.

There is some debate within Canada as to whether a skilled labor shortage exists or not. The headline of this  April 11 Canadian Press story called evidence for such a gap “skimpy and selective”. The article quoted critics who wondered if such programs might suppress wages for Canadians who already have the targeted skills, or would be happy to acquire them.

The question of labor shortages come amidst headlines back in early April over a program that replaced employed Canadians with imported temporary foreign workers at Canada’s largest bank. (Rules for foreign temporary workers are reportedly being tightened in response to that incident, which left some bank officials and even the Prime Minister clarifying their positions in the wake of negative public reaction.)

Meanwhile, this May 7th article from Canada.com titled “How Canada is winning the race in recruiting skilled immigrants while the U.S. lags behind” describes one instance of an Atlanta-area mechanic, Paul Thomas, who liked what he heard and saw:

The recruiter sent Thomas an e-mail loaded with video links describing the company, the owner’s charity projects and the city of Prince George, dubbed the “Northern Capital” of British Columbia. “My wife and I were excited,” Thomas, 45, said. “Auto mechanics don’t get approached by recruiters, so it was sort of nice being catered to.”

The dealership, specializing in heavy-duty trucks, paid for him to visit the area. He was hired last March under a skilled worker program and in a month had a work permit. With a contract paying up to $100,000 a year and government-provided health care, a job in Canada was like “I scratched a lottery ticket,” he said.

According to this 2010 New York Times article on Canada’s selective hunt for new citizens:

…there is no such thing in Canada as an anti-immigrant politician. Few nations take more immigrants per capita, and perhaps none with less fuss.

In the case of this particular program, if you have the skills, the interest and are willing to relocate, it would be prudent to proceed quickly. The program is capped at just 5,000 applicants between now and April 30 2014, and will only take 300 in each priority occupation.

And now a question for both Canadians and Americans: do you think attracting immigrants with specific skills a good strategy for employers and national economies? Or is it better (preferable?) to train existing citizens and fill sector gaps by hiring from within?

Will casinos boost the Adirondack economy?

The Las Vegas strip. Photo: BrendelSignature, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

The editorial board of Denton Publications — the newspaper chain based in Elizabethtown that covers much of the Adirondacks — has come out with a full-throated endorsement of casino gambling in the Park.

“Towns like Newcomb, Port Henry and Tupper Lake that once thrived from logging and mining now seem to be headed the way of Black Hawk, Central City and Cripple Creek,” DenPubs argued, comparing rural towns here to post-gold rush communities in Colorado.

Certainly the argument can be made that casinos would forever alter the quality of life that makes the Adirondacks the special place it is.

But through progressive planning — like forcing casinos into commercial districts, limiting stakes and establishing set closing times — casino gambling could be as good a fit here as it proved to be in Black Hawk, Central City and Cripple Creek.

So what do you think?  Casinos are already a hot topic for debate in the Catskills.  And the casino on the Akwesasne Mohawk reservation in northern Franklin County has been a huge boost for the community there.

Do you want to see slots and blackjack at the old Frontier Town location, or perhaps at the old Lowe’s location near Fort Ticonderoga, as Denpubs suggests?  Comments welcome, as always.

Afternoon read: Open for Business, closed to accountability?

A map of New York’s Regional Economic Development Councils. Image: regionalcouncils.ny.gov

New York’s Regional Economic Development Councils have been good to the North Country, and many would argue very good for the North Country. The REDCs pit New York regions against one another for economic development money from the state, and in the two rounds of awards given so far, the North Country has come out ahead. Late last year, North Country REDC won $90.2 million from the state; in 2011, it got $103.2 million, both among the top awards. In his state budget address in January, Gov. Cuomo confirmed the REDCs would be back for a third round, with $220 million in state funds, and has proposed giving those councils “a voice in how to spend new pots of money including a $50 million venture capital fund and several million more to support ‘hot spots.’”

Now, it’s worth remembering that this money’s coming from somewhere. This isn’t brand new money the state’s giving away — the REDC application process, evocatively known as the “consolidated funding application”, effectively replaces a more centrally-controlled system of distributing economic development funding. Here’s what the regional councils’ web site has to say about why that’s better (from the Frequently Asked Questions section):

The Regional Council approach is a fundamental departure from New York’s traditional economic development approach, which has been top-down and State-directed. The Governor’s vision is that the State will rely on regional expertise to identify and prioritize significant projects that would maximize the State’s return on investment.

But not everyone agrees it’s better, and in this case, by not everyone, I mean New York Assembly Speak Sheldon Silver. He’s in the Albany Times-Union’s Capitol Confidential blog today, voicing some objections to the new system. Basically, Silver complains that the REDCs, in to some degree replacing the “member item” system (which is, inarguably, flawed) take government out of the hands of legislators picked by the electorate, and put it into the hands of appointed councils.

More from the Capitol Confidential:

There was no discernible application process for the councils, which Cuomo aides stacked mostly with business leaders. Each council at least one representative of organized labor, and is co-chaired by a leader in higher education and business.

Area legislators were at first granted ex officio status on the councils, and given voting rights a year later.

“There’s a concern that the governor is attempting to expand the role of regional economic development council to the exclusion of the Legislature,” Silver, D-Manhattan, said.

He said it was not a question of changing funding amounts or accepting the ability to appoint members, but rather, “we are part of an appropriation process here, and we should continue to be part of an appropriation process. If there is no legislative authority for economic development councils — members are not subject to any rules or regulations — this question of taking over appropriation authority entirely is probably not appropriate.”

“When there are results — I was sitting at every meeting — I had no idea groups were even applying,” Silver continued. “I don’t know that there was any information offered.”

Complaints about how Gov. Cuomo governs often fall under the category of “we didn’t know what was going on” (cf. the new”New York SAFE” gun law, a major objection to which has been that the bill was passed too fast, and without enough time for public input). The governor has also been criticized recently as taking a heavy-handed approach to press inquiries, and for, it’s been alleged, forcing a DOT official into retirement after he spoke without permission to the Adirondack Daily Enterprise (and NCPR) reporter Chris Knight for a story about the state’s response to Tropical Storm Irene.

It seems that Assemblyman Silver’s criticisms of the Regional Economic Development Councils fall within those same lines. Of course, turf is turf and Silver’s complaints may just contain an element of sour grapes, but it seems worth thinking about, both in terms of the governor’s political career and in our future as a democratic body.

Afternoon read: Spending and going broke

Not how the state does its revenue gathering, one hopes. Photo: Tax Credits CC some rights reserved

New York’s legislature is still hammering out the state budget today, and it doesn’t look likely they’ll be done before tomorrow. But some information’s starting to come out about what New York will be spending its money on in the coming fiscal year.

It looks like the minimum wage increase is a go, reports WTNY News, which says

New York State’s minimum wage is set to go up in the latest budget deal.

According to reports the minimum wage in the Empire State will jump from $7.25 an hour to $8.00 an hour in January of 2014. Further increases would see the minimum wage move to $8.75 in 2015 and then $9.00 in 2016.

A measure to have the minimum wage automatically increase with the rate of inflation has been tabled.

Meanwhile, the Albany Times-Union’s Capitol Confidential blog reports that legislators agreed today on various and sundry tax breaks which are tied to the renewal of the “millionaires tax.” That tax (a surcharge on those reporting more than $1 million in income, which obviously includes me as a public radio reporter) is due to expire in 2014. It’s not clear whether this renewal will be permanent or will “sunset”, as they say, in another couple years. Assemblyman Sheldon Silver (D-Manhattan) had an excellently noncommittal, and very New York-y response to that question: “I could do everything permanent, I could do everything sunset,” said the assemblyman. Was he shrugging when he said it? I don’t know.

We, in particular reporter Julie Grant, have reported a lot here on the impacts of state aid to local schools (recently, on eighteen upstate senators coming together to push for more state money for school). Today in the Adirondack Daily Enterprise, Chris Knight reports on the Tupper Lake Central School District, which said Monday that if it doesn’t get more state aid it may over the next few years become insolvent and have to close its doors. We’ll have more on that story on our air, tomorrow on the 8 O’clock Hour. As board member Jane Whitmore said at Monday’s meeting, “it’s scary times.”

 

 

 

 

 

Cuomo To Cities: Drop Dead

So first a little history.

Way back in October of 1975, President Gerald Ford gave a speech making it clear that no Federal bailout would be forthcoming to keep cash-strapped New York City afloat.

The New York Daily News, in its inimitable fashion, distilled Ford’s comments to two blunt words (which Ford never actually uttered):  Drop Dead.

Fast forward to 2013 and we find Governor Andrew Cuomo delivering much the same message to school districts, towns and villages across New York.

In a speech last week, Cuomo argued that many local governments and school systems should cease to exist, agreeing to merge or consolidate their operations.

“If you are a school district, or a city, or a town or a county, and you are looking for a fundamental financial reform, consolidation is one of the obvious ones,” Cuomo said.

In a way, this is nothing new.  For years — going back to his time as attorney general — Cuomo has decried the thousands of separate and often layered taxing jurisdictions in New York.

His basic argument is that the balkanized system of 19th-century-era political entities is a costly throw-back and that local officials are on the wrong side of history.

“New York’s antiquated system of local government today consists of more than 10,500 governmental entities. This oversized and inefficient bureaucracy is a luxury taxpayers cannot afford,” Cuomo has argued.

In one sense, Cuomo is clearly correct.  New York does have a crazy high number of local taxing jurisdictions when compared with states of comparable population.

Many of these entities are zombie jurisdictions.  School districts with only a handful of kids.  Towns that barely exist in any meaningful sense.

Hamilton County, here in the North Country, has a county government, ten different towns and a half-dozen school districts, all for a population of roughly 5,000 people.

The people of Saranac Lake, meanwhile, are represented by two towns, two counties, a village and a school district.  For those communities, Cuomo’s message is clear.  The fiscal crisis isn’t a crisis.  It’s an opportunity.  This from the Associated Press:

Gov. Andrew Cuomo had tough words Friday for local officials facing fiscal crises and seeking more help from Albany, telling them they should consolidate services or whole governments and school districts rather than looking for relief from Albany.

Sounds like simple, tough medicine.

But in fact, the “crisis” that Cuomo is leveraging to “right size” local government in New York state is partly of his making.

Early in his first term, Cuomo pushed through a 2% property tax cap, one of his signature achievements, but he also failed to deliver on promises of mandate reform.

So even when local governments and districts merge, Albany still forces them to do a lot of costly, wasteful things, and refuses to grant local leaders the flexibility to find more efficient solutions.

It’s also a simple fact that Albany has decentralized more and more essential government services to the local level, so that counties and towns are performing many of the front-line social and public safety functions that people rely upon.

As state aid has flattened, local governments have been forced to downsize things like home care for seniors.  Nursing homes have been privatized or closed.

“Talk of consolidation is just an avoidance action by the state so they can avoid the real problem of state mandates,” Peter Baynes of the New York Conference of Mayors told the AP last week.

“If you talk to any local government in New York state, they can rattle off the consolidations they’ve made and they are squeezing all the savings they can out of shared services.”

That probably overstates the case.  There are still a lot of bend-in-the-road local taxing jurisdictions that have outlived their usefulness.  Cuomo clearly wants to see more of those governments killed off before he offers relief.

But as the governor’s “off with their heads” approach to local government faces one final hurdle:  the will of the people.

Again and again, here in the North Country and elsewhere, voters have flat rejected consolidations and mergers by overwhelming margins.

Earlier this month, voters in Glens Falls rejected a modest school district consolidation — which had reasonably strong support from local leaders and from the Glens Falls Post Star’s editorial board — by roughly 4-to-1.

So tough rhetoric aside, it’s an open question whether Cuomo’s “starve the beast” approach to taking down local governments will work.

And it’s an open question whether consolidations and mergers will produce the kind of cost savings that will allow communities to continue providing essential services without more aid and flexibility in Albany.

Making the cut

Two articles in Tuesday’s papers underline how state and federal cuts are hitting home in our world of budgetary restrictions and sequestrations.

First, North Country Now reports that St. Lawrence NYSARC (a not-for-profit organization that supports people with intellectual and other developmental disabilities and their families) will lose $1.3 million in support from the state in this year’s budget. The impact on NYSARC chapters statewide could reach $240 million — half of that from direct state cuts, and the other half from matching funds the organization won’t get due to those cuts.

In the article, NYSARC State Executive Director Mark Brandt described the cuts as “catastrophic.” He says these are in addition to nearly $350 million in cuts to developmental disabilities services over the last three years; he’s calling upon the state to reinstate the funds.

Back in St. Lawrence County, NYSARC’s budget is about $29 million per year; with that money they serve 750 people with developmental disabilities in the county. The organization provides residential units, jobs, rehabilitation and other programs; and Brandt says many services may have to close. More details in the story.

Second, now that sequestration has come into effect, its local impacts are being reckoned. On this front, the Watertown Daily Times reports today that Fort Drum and the union that represents civilian workers there (the American Federation of Government Employees Local 400) are meeting to talk about how they’ll implement the cuts.

Union president Jeffrey W. Zuhlke told the paper he’s expecting between 95 and 98 percent of civilian employees will face furlough days (some exceptions may be made for emergency personnel.) The furloughs will be 22 days, to be taken between late April and the end of September. Zuhlke says they could result in 21 to 30 percent net deductions in pay.

The first day of negotiations was cordial enough, Zuhlke said: “We’re all in the same boat as Congress continues to drill holes in the bottom of it.”