Posts Tagged ‘flooding’

Tues news roundup: Massena Memorial, graduation rates, home buyouts

Reading the newspaper. Photo: kattebelletje, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Reading the newspaper. Photo: kattebelletje, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Correction: A previous version of this post identified Clifton-Fine as being in Franklin County, when it is in fact located in St. Lawrence County. Thanks, sharp reader, for catching my error!

Happy Tuesday! Graduation rates, flood buyouts, hospital privatization, and ever so much more in the news today.

The New York State Education Department has released its graduation rates for what’s called the “2008 cohort” (that’s students who started 9th grade in 2008 to you and me). Of those students, who in more classic high school parlance would be called the class of 2012, 74 percent actually graduated in 2012 statewide. You can find all the gory details here, and the results by district here (this is a 1,300-page PDF, by the way.)

In Jefferson County,  The Watertown Daily Times is reporting that several area districts aren’t keeping up with that state average: Clifton-Fine Central School District students have only graduated in four years at a rate of 65.4 percent; Harrisville Central students, at a 68.8 percent rate.

However, Jefferson County as a whole is doing quite well, with an 86.4 percent four-year graduation rate. Lewis County averaged 83.6 percent, with St. Lawrence County lower but still above the state average at 78.7 percent. Much more information in the article, and much more (really) in the state documents.

We reported earlier this month on the possibility of privatizing Massena Memorial Hospital, and opposition to it (here’s a conversation between Julie Grant and Mark Kotzin, spokesperson for the Civil Service Employees Association, which is leading the charge against privatization.) The Watertown Daily Times reports today that the hospital is inviting two firms in to present their views on how privatization would work. At a hospital board meeting Monday night, hospital Director of Public Relations and Planning Tina Corcoran told the paper that privatization is something the hospital has to explore as a way of containing costs. Pension costs are one issue, she said, as is the possibility of collaborating with other hospitals, which is curtailed under the current ownership.

And after years of damaging winter and spring floods in Malone, Franklin County will apply for federal funds to buy out 10 flood-damaged houses on Lower Park Street. But those funds, if they do appear, could take up to two years, so hopeful homesellers may have at least one more flood cycle to withstand before they can cash out.

That’s according to the Plattsburgh Press-Republican, which reports that County Emergency Services Director Ricky Provost described the plan thusly at the Monday county legislators’ meeting: The properties, on the west side of the street, would be demolished and the land “brought back to its original form.” Then, the roadway would be raised between 15 and 20 feet, and reconfigured so as to protect homes on the east side of the street. Three other property owners haven’t filled out the buyout paperwork; town supervisor Howard Maneely told the paper that although eminent domain doesn’t apply in this case, he will meet again with those who weren’t interested to talk about the plan, and may look into condemning the properties.

In our newsroom today, Brian Mann talks in detail with New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Commissioner Joe Martens about some of the thornier issues current rearing their heads in the Adirondack park; Gov. Cuomo may not see some of the key aspects of his late-session agenda (the Women’s Equality Act and campaign finance reform, for example) come to fruition in the remaining couple days of the session; details on the arrest of Montreal’s mayor on corruption charges (rough month for Canadian mayors, non?) And a lot more, too.

What about “going Dutch” on flood protection?

Every few years news stories circulate about how advanced the Netherlands is at preventing devastating flooding.

Sometimes that’s because of current events like Katrina, or Sandy. Other times the tone of coverage is simple awe at stupendous feats of human engineering and national will.

Either way, it’s a fascinating subject with centuries of experience behind all that expertise.

Flood control is serious business in the Netherlands, as the 9-km long Eastern Scheldt storm surge barrier demonstrates. A placque on the artificial island anchoring one end bears the message (translated) “Here the tide is ruled, by the wind, the moon and us (the Dutch).” Photo: Mark Fletcher, CC some rights reserved

The Netherlands learned old tricks – and keeps inventing new ones – out of sheer necessity. Roughly half of that coastal country’s land lies below sea level, and two-thirds of it would be unusable without flood-control measures.

It’s a small country with major rivers that drain into the turbulent North Sea. So lives, property and prosperity are at stake in no uncertain terms. Making sure water stays where it’s wanted takes committed planning, shared sacrifice and mountains of money. The high level of expertise developed in the Netherlands has become an exportable resource for which one can expect increasing demand.

David Wolman wrote about this for Wired Magazine back in Dec 2008, in a useful article with excellent photos and graphics. (Really, it’s worth a click and a read.)

Referencing current interest in Dutch expertise in this Nov 14th article by Andrew Higgins, the New York Times cautions that:

The Dutch “way of thinking is completely different from the U.S.,” where disaster relief generally takes precedence over disaster avoidance, said Wim Kuijken, the Dutch government’s senior official for overall water control policy. “The U.S. is excellent at disaster management,” but “working to avoid disaster is completely different from working after a disaster.”

No kidding.

There are a lot of significant reasons the Dutch example may not transplant well.

For starters, unlike the Netherlands, the U.S. as a nation has yet to decide if global warming is for real.

Assuming it is, there would be further quarrels about the role of government in addressing the issue. The turf battles between government and the private sector, federal authority verses state or local control – how would all that get sorted out?

Betond politics, there would be questions of scale and affordability. The U.S. is w-a-y bigger than the Netherlands. (Just Vermont and New Hampshire combined are bigger.) What works there might have to be customized for each coast and major city on North America. At a staggering cost. (While this post is being framed in U.S. terms, most of the same issues apply to Canada as well.)

The Dutch have done the math. That nation has decided the situation demands massive spending to prevent massive disaster. A DeltaComittee was established, which identified proactive strategies for specific regions, meant to curtail flood and storm threats – for the next 200 years.

According to the Wired article, the Dutch have even faced the harsh reality that some areas warrant more spending and stronger protection than others.

Given the election-cycle and “what’s-in-it-for-my-district” thinking so dominent here, the Dutch ability to plan and commit is amazing. And yet, on a geologic scale, 200 years is a blink of an eye. Not to mention the worrisome fact predictions about melting ice caps and such have mostly underestimated the actual speed of current changes. But it’s a serious effort, anyway.

Serious as that is, is it enough? Let’s say the Dutch nail this, that everything they build works just as designed. Well, that’ll only buy relative flood safety for two centuries. If surprising change is the new normal, the whole superhuman effort may have to be continued or redone again and again – an expense that never relents.

Just imagine the “pay now or pay later” arguments. Or the possibility that the really big countries have a cheaper choice: falling back inland as sea levels rise.

On the other hand, thinking ahead, applying engineered solutions and/or working with natural forces is how the Netherlands became a prosperous nation in the first place.

In contrast, North America has sort of rested on its laurels of plenty, without needing that level of pro-active co-ordination in managing natural security on a country-wide basis.

There’s little consensus here on what lies ahead, in terms of weather events and climate change.

When you look at how a country like the Netherlands tries to deal with this murky reality, does their approach seem wise? Practical?

Or is it irrelevant to our lives – considering the size of the U.S. and deep political disagreement about climate issues?

Morning Read: Remembering the Flood of 2011

The Burlington Free Press notes that a year ago today the waters of Lake Champlain rose above flood stage, launching a battle for survival that gripped the valley for months.  (The lake didn’t drop below flood stage again until June 19th.)

A near record snow pack in the early spring, followed by an April that became the wettest on record contributed to a large part of the flooding.

During the long lake flood, road crews worked for weeks dumping countless tons of rocks along lakeshore roads to prevent them from eroding in the waves. Camp owners also tried to fortify their property, or watched helplessly as waves battered through camp walls and living spaces.

The lake flooding was astonishing.  I remember time and time again standing in places and just being flabbergasted that the high water had reached places that seemed untouchable.

I snapped the picture above while driving through a neighborhood in Plattsburgh.  The good news is that the recovery has been remarkable.  Drive along the shore these days and businesses have reopened, roads are back in place.

The effort to bounce back has been just as astonishing as the flood itself.

Neighbor to neighbor

Curt Stager posted another great account of Irene’s aftermath at his Save the Carbon website.

This time, he takes us to the shattered section of the Ausable Valley between Ausable Forks and Keene Valley, ending up with a post centered in Upper Jay.

He has lots of striking photos of damaged and re-located buildings, and of people helping people. The Brookside Motor Inn wasn’t flooded, and has opened an impromptu food pantry and way sattion.

Curt found owner Marlene Prescott near a sign that said “take what you need.”
“Just stop on by if you need a meal, or if you’d like to contribute food or money or labor,” she said.
“We’re a close community, and we help each other out.”

Morning Read 2: Is a flooded Lake Champlain the new normal?

Extent of recent Lake Champlain flooding. Map: Lake Champlain Basin Program

The Burlington Free Press is reporting this morning that Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin thinks that climate change may have already changed life in the Champlain Valley for good.

“We’re concerned about how we get the resources to solve the new reality of higher water levels,” Shumlin said. “Our assumptions about the places we live and recreate have to change. We need to think about how we plan for the next 50 years” of what is likely to be wetter weather.

Shumlin has already opened talks with Quebec’s Premier Jean Charest and plans to draw New York Governor Andrew Cuomo into the conversation.

His comments follow a Washington Post essay published by Vermont’s leading climate change activist Bill McKibben, who argued that global weather crises — from Midwestern tornadoes to “megafloods” — could be triggered by global warming.

“Do we have a bigger problem than $4-a-gallon gasoline?” McKibben asked.

So what do you think?  As hundreds of homeowners along the shore of Lake Champlain hunker down for another month underwater, are we already living in a world significantly altered by carbon pollution?

As always your comments welcome.

Morning Read: Lake Champlain program loses $1 million

The Burlington Free Press reported this week that one of the region’s biggest research and ecological watchdog institutions — the Lake Champlain Basin Program — will lose about $1 million in Federal funding next year.

The good news?  Leaders of the organization say they feared deeper cuts and say this reduction only returns them to 2009 levels.

“We are so pleased to have that level of support when federal budgets are under so much stress,” Basin Program Manager Bill Howland said. The $3 million allocation will allow his group to plug some of the holes punched in other lake programs by budget cuts at other federal agencies, he said.

The LCBP has a leading role in tackling phosphorous pollution in Lake Champlain, and has also been monitoring impacts to the lake from this spring’s mega-floods.  Read the full article here.

Morning Read: What if the Conklingville Dam had failed?

Conklingville Dam

Conklingville Dam on Great Sacandaga Reservoir (Source: HRBRRD)

At the height of the spring floods earlier this month, officials with the Hudson River Black River Regulating District issued a warning that their massive dam on the Great Sacandaga Reservoir might be failing.

The announcement triggered a near panic among some residents.  This morning, the Glens Falls Post Star reports on a meeting between District officials and local emergency responders to talk about what happened.

Online and by phone, officials said, alarm about a breach at the dam spread rapidly among residents and was hard to quell.

“We certainly didn’t want to create panic in the street, but we did want to give some level of urgency to our message,” said Paul Lent, director of the Saratoga County Office of Emergency Services. “It’s a really delicate walk.”

Equally alarming, perhaps, was the fact that many residents apparently weren’t notified that there might be a significant problem with the structure, which holds back one of the largest waterbodies in the North Country.

Warren County officials have been criticized for not being more proactive in alerting residents, but they have defended their response by saying the information showed there was little reason for concern.

In fact, the alert was a false alarm, based on erroneous water-level readings.  Pressed to develop a better system for alerting the public about problems, the Regulating District said it lacked the cash to do so.

Read the Post Star’s full article here.

Wind means more trouble for Lake Champlain shores

Lake Champlain rose again yesterday – as south winds pushed water back onto roads and waterfront.

Communities had been fearing a shift in the winds. The lake is LONG…and even in normal times, a persistent wind can shift volumes of water, sort of tilting the surface one way or the other.

The Plattsburgh Press Republican reports this morning that winds of 20 to 30 miles an hour brought the lake up to nearly 103 feet above sea level, higher than it was over the weekend.

Town and city crews from Plattsburgh to Rousses Point worked to shore up emergency berms protecting roads and properties.

Clinton County Emergency Services Director Eric Day told the Press republican damage was widespread to south-facing property on the lake.

“About a month ago, we had the same wind,” he told the paper, but then, “the lake was three feet lower.”

Is the Flood of 2011 a defining moment for the North Country?

Yesterday, I stood in the living room of Charity Marlatt high on a hillside over Keene Valley.  Her home sits on a big slab of glacial soil and rock that’s slowly oozing downward.

Weeks of heavy rain have dislodged a section of the hillside roughly a mile in circumference.

Meanwhile, the 600-mile shoreline of Lake Champlain remains underwater, with banks eroded, homes and businesses flooded.

The Raquette River reached a level that Mike Lynch, at the Adirondack Daily Enterprise, described as a 500-year high.

The torrent devastated homes, damaged wastewater treatment plants, and stretched emergency responder crews to the limit.

Even when the rain stops (maybe Saturday) it could take weeks for hillsides to stabilize and lakes to return to normal levels.

With Memorial Day weekend drawing near, that means the brief, vitally important tourism season is imperiled for many communities.

It’s difficult sometimes to put events like this one in perspective. Is the flood a big enough disaster to really change things in the North Country?  I’m not sure.

But I do suspect that some towns and villages could feel the effects for a longer period than, say, after the massive ice storm of 1998.

How come?

First, because many communities, and their economies, are more fragile now than they were just a dozen years ago.

We’re grayer than we were back then, thanks to long-standing demographic trends.  And many of our businesses have been weakened by the recession.

It strikes me as symbolic that Port Henry — one of the hardest hit communities — no longer has an Aubuchon hardware stores downtown where you can buy the supplies needed in a disaster like this.

How will shops and markets in Willsboro, Essex and Westport get by if the crucial ferry to Vermont remains closed for several more weeks?

Farmers, too, are struggling with flooded, mud-choked fields at a time when they’re also faced with rising fuel costs, and unstable milk prices.

Meanwhile, a lot of local leaders I talk to are skeptical about the ability of New York state and the Federal Emergency Management Agency to offer much help.

New York state is basically broke.  And FEMA is busy wrestling with natural disasters in the South, the Midwest, and the Mississippi River valley that make our floods look downright tame.

Who knows how this will all play out? People here are resilient, creative, and they’ve weathered big storms before.

Maybe a year from now, the flood won’t look like such a big deal.

Still, for hundreds of families and business owners — from the Adirondacks to Great Sacandaga, the Hudson Valley and Lake Champlain to the St. Lawrence Valley — there are clearly some bitter weeks and months ahead.

We should all keep this in mind as the floods slip out of the headlines and the summer weather finally arrives.  For many of our neighbors, the effects of the high water will linger for a long time.

What do you think?  How has the Flood of 2011 affected you, your family, and your community?  Comments welcome below.

Friday Five: Floods, floods, floods

We were swallowed up by flood reporting this week, and that’s apparently what interested you the most as well. All five of our top reports and blog posts involved high water.

First was David Sommerstein’s report about fresh worries and some accusations in Colton on May 5th.

Then came Chris Knight’s report that Saranac Lake village could face damage topping $5 million.

We also had a lot of traffic for stories about Lake Champlain flooding, which you can check out here and here.

There was a good discussion on the In Box about the role of big government in responding to crises like this one.

We also got a lot of attention for our report looking at cooperation and teamwork between communities and state agencies.