Posts Tagged ‘media’

Media Notes: Glens Falls Post Star ads paywall, Almanack gets new look, new paddling film

May 1st, 2012 by Brian Mann

A few media notes for this Tuesday afternoon.  First is news that readers of the Glens Falls Post Star will, after today, be limited to fifteen free reads per month (CORRECTED).  After that, you'll have to subscribe.

Meanwhile, the Adirondack Almanack — in its new partnership with the Explorer –  has a brand new look.

There's a big new film from Mike Lynch, outdoor writer for the Adirondack Daily Enterprise about the Northern Forest Canoe Trail.

Also, the Saranac Lake based political cartoonist Marquil is now being featured in Newsday.

Morning Read: Governments behaving badly

April 20th, 2012 by Brian Mann

So if there's one broad bias that runs through the In Box narrative, it's that I think government and politicians generally deserve more praise and respect than they get from voters.

But sometimes it's hard not to shake your head at the shenanigans that public officials get up to.  Take the scandal in Jefferson County that involves topless photos of a sheriff's deputy.  This from the Watertown Daily Times.

[I]n the state Supreme Court lawsuit, sheriff’s Deputy Krystal G. Rice, alleges that a detective took topless photographs of her in an online pedophile sting and that those photographs no longer can be accounted for.

Then there's the simmering crisis in Lake Placid, where the school district superintendent is under siege from voters for describing some female staff members as "bitches," and where the high school and middle school principal abruptly left her post last week.

This from the Adirondack Daily Enterprise:

Earlier in the evening, former middle-high school Principal Robert Schiller…said [superintendent Randy] Richards has exhibited "behavior unbecoming of a school leader, flawed decision making, retribution in the workplace, lack of respect for work environment, lack of effective communication, disregard for parents' needs and concerns, and lack of long-range planning designed to return the district to a place of excellence in the North Country."

This next story falls outside our region, but I just stumbled across reports that public school teachers in Buffalo were granted free plastic surgery as part of the contract — a deal signed off on by school district officials.

Last year, that provision cost taxpayers $5.9 million according to the Buffalo News.

The cost fluctuates from year to year because the district pays out of pocket for every procedure, rather than paying a set premium to an insurance company.

The benefit is used by about 500 people a year — less than 2 percent of those who are eligible for it.

Yikes.  In this age when governments, politicians, and public employees face constant criticisms and attacks, you'd think officials and union leaders would be smarter than that.

These scandals aren't just gossip.  They have real-world impacts.

The sexual harassment case that forced Harrietstown supervisor Larry Miller out of office cost taxpayers $30,000 in settlement costs.  The sheriff's office case in Jefferson County has sparked a $50 million lawsuit.

And in Lake Placid, it's possible that the on-going turmoil in the district could convince people to vote against this year's district budget, an outcome that could seriously disrupt education programs.

How do you see these cases?  Outliers?  Rare exceptions that draw most of the media coverage?  What's your view generally of local government in the North Country?

Burlington Free Press a Pulitzer finalist

April 17th, 2012 by Sarah Harris

The Burlington Free Press has been named a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize in the editorial writing category.

Editorial page editor Aki Soga and Executive Editor Michael Townshend were recognized by the Pulitzer Prizes website for “their campaign that resulted in the state’s first reform of open government in 35 years, reducing legal obstacles that helped shroud the work of government officials.”

Soga and Townshend have written extensively about public records reform and in 2010 won the Scripps Howard Foundation National Journalism Award for their editorial campaign.

The other two finalists in the editorial writing category were the Tampa Bay Times and Bloomberg News. No winner was chosen among them.

North Country journalism wins

April 11th, 2012 by Brian Mann

Will Doolittle (Source: Glens Falls Post Star)

We've been grumbling a bit lately about cutbacks and challenges in the North Country's media culture, so why not enjoy a couple of quick victory laps?

First, a shout-out to Will Doolittle at the Glens Falls Post-Star, who won a Society of Professional Journalists award for his reporting on veterans dealing with the aftermath of Agent Orange exposure.  This from the Post Star.

The series was told primarily through the struggles of a local man, Charles Cooley of Fort Edward, whose benefit payments were stopped after his condition worsened and he applied to have his disability level raised.

As a direct result of the stories, Cooley’s benefits were restored at a higher level and he received a lump sum check to cover back payments.

“This is a great example of what great journalism can accomplish,” Post-Star Editor Ken Tingley said. “These stories changed the life of Mr. Cooley and helped to right a wrong. You cannot ask for anything more rewarding than that.”

And another big kudo to former NCPR freelancer Jacob Resneck, who has a byline in this week's USA Today, reporting from Turkey on the continuing violence in Syria.  Here's a taste:

Former Syrian secret police operative Zakaria Mohammed walked for three days from Dier al Zour to get here this weekend, he said. He deserted after regime troops arrived and began indiscriminately killing civilians and members of their own ranks who hesitated to follow orders.

"They call it the security solution," he said. "But it's inhumane. They have been stripped of every sense of humanity. They'll take a whole family to prison and torture them."

Pretty cool for journalists from our corner of the world to get that kind of exposure and recognition.  Congrats…

North Country newspapers face deep job cuts, budget pressures

April 8th, 2012 by Brian Mann

Glens Falls Post Star (of 10/31/11)

The last couple of years, a simmering debate has unfolded here on the In Box and in other venues over the future health of the Adirondack-North Country journalism culture.

That often-heated conversation was revived this month by news that the Glens Falls Post Star's corporate owner had decided to cut a third of the newspaper's reporting staff.  (News of the decision was first reported by blogger Mark Wilson.)

Dan Alexander, publisher of the Denton Publications chain of newspapers, based in Elizabethtown, blasted the decision in an editorial as "nothing more than greed."

He questioned "the corporate culture that is killing the sense of community these organizations once had."

More shocking than the cuts at the Post-Star and the 51 other Lee Enterprise-owned papers who made similar large-scale staff cuts across the country, was the announcement just days before that Lee CEO Mary Junck was awarded a $500,000 bonus and CFO Carl Schmidt was awarded a $250,000 bonus.

Of course, the Post Star isn't the only newspaper squeezing its editorial staff.

This spring, the Watertown Daily Times eliminated its long-standing and highly respected Washington DC bureau.  (Hat tip to TomL for pointing this out.)

"Well, the saddest part about all these lost bureaus, and now the north country’s, is the stories that never will be written because the paper won’t have eyes at the Capitol to see them," wrote Marc Heller, WDT's veteran Washington correspondent.

Lake Placid News publisher Cathy Moore is also cutting the reporter position at the weekly paper.  (Corrected:  the LP News is a weekly, not a daily.)

And the Plattsburgh Press-Republican continues to require that reporters take mandatory unpaid furlough days.

(All of these newspapers, with the exception of the Watertown Daily Times, are owned by corporate chains, headquartered outside the region.)

Why does all this matter?  It means fewer journalists out on the beat, for one thing.  That means fewer eyes on local government, fewer people tracking important stories.

But tightening budgets will also, inevitably, mean fewer really great reporters sticking around in the North Country.  If you can't earn a decent living, pay your  mortgage, maybe earn enough to put your kids through college — you're not going to stay, right?

Complicating this dreary news is the fact that some elements of the region's media culture are thriving.

Denton Publications — also locally owned — has continued to build a stronger and stronger newsroom, breaking more important stories across the region.

NCPR, which is licensed to St. Lawrence University in Canton, has been adding staff and stringers, with new people on the ground now in the Plattsburgh-Burlington area and in Watertown.

Then there's the growing clout of bloggers and "citizen journalists," exemplified in this case by the professional-grade reporting and analysis of Mark Wilson, who broke the story of the Post-Star's cutbacks.

What we know for certain is that the media culture — and the business of media — are changing rapidly, because of technological changes, new patterns of corporate ownership, new ways that people use media.

We also know that this process is hurting a lot of great reporters, leaving them unemployed and with few prospects.

What we don't yet know is how well the public will be served going forward.  Will there be enough alert, skeptical, curious people out there to serve as watchdogs, community bulletin boards, and information sharers?

As always, your views welcome.

Does the newsroom have a glass ceiling?

April 6th, 2012 by Sarah Harris

The number of 2011 New Yorker articles written by men and women. Image: VIDA

My friend from college is an up-and-coming D.C. print journalist. We're always checking in and comparing notes about our work. But her latest memo detailed a strange sort of sexism she's encountered in the journalistic world: "You are a girl," she told me. "So you're expected to write about girl things."

Girl things is short for women's issues: contraceptives, abortion, parenting, and, yes, the "war on women." But my friend wants to write about public policy and campaign finance. She has no interesting in writing about the pill. None at all.

According to a 2011 count conducted by VIDA: Women in Literary Arts, that's precisely what female writers are expected to do.

"When it comes to a career in journalism, chicks should stick to writing about chicks," VIDA co-founder and poet Erin Belieu lamented to Mother Jones.

Belieu and her colleagues counted the number of articles written by women in publications like The New Yorker, The Atlantic, and Harpers. Their conclusion: that between 65 and 75 percent of the material was written by men.

And then there's the issue of who writes which stories. Do men get all the serious bylines, while women write about women's issues–or worse, fluff? Here's Belieu:

"A friend of mine defines this kind of intellectual segregation as the "tits and nether bits" ghetto, a place in which women only speak to other women. Meantime, men are allowed and encouraged to speak to whomever they want. We also want to give women writers the confidence to say, "Hey, I can write about whatever I want. I have authority. I have expertise. I have a unique perspective as a person, first and foremost."

I like covering and reading about women's issues because I care about them. But I shudder to imagine a journalism career in which writing about women's issues proved its own glass ceiling.

What do you think? Should women be the people covering women's issues? And is journalism still a man's game?

Why I care about public media

March 26th, 2012 by Sarah Harris

When I was in high school I started driving a car. This was in Dallas, Texas. The car symbolized total freedom — I could go where I wanted. I could list to the music I wanted. My car was way too decrepit to handle an iPod, so what did I do? I started fiddling with the radio dial. Sometimes I listened to K104, the hip hop station. Other days I listened to Mix 102.9. And most mornings I tuned in to KERA, our NPR member station.

Of course, the vehicle was not without responsibility. Each day I was tasked with the job of chauffeuring my little sister to and from our school. She must've been 12 or 13 years old. I'd usually roll into the car, hair tousled, clutching a giant travel mug of tea and a piece of toast. Mary Frances would spend the morning preening, and I'd wait impatiently, starting the engine or occasionally blaring the horn.

Except on Friday mornings. Without fail, Mary Frances would be ready–backback stowed, seatbelt buckled, radio on– by 7:27 a.m., in time for Story Corps. She loved that program. I think one time it made her cry. I remember laughing with her as an Eastern European woman talked about her first Halloween in America. It was a neat thing for us to share, and I remember thinking how cool it was that my sister–who I would venture to say is not an atypical teenager–was moved by these little narratives.

Sarah Harris making public radio on Lake Champlain.

The more I learn about the public media landscape, the more I realize what a valuable resource it is. The programming informs, entertains, and inspires. We  bring you news and information about your community, and communities across the globe. And our reach is wide. I think all these things really hit home when I sold a story about ice sailing to NPR and it aired on All Things Considered. I heard from a lot of people in all parts of my life: my middle school librarian. The guy who fixes my car. The nurse from the summer camp I went to as a kid. Of course, the first person to call was my sister.

"Oh. My. God.," she exclaimed. "You're on NPR!" What did you think?" I asked. "You didn't sound like you," she immediately replied. "Well you did, but like you in pretentious-land." Eek. My sister, like most everybody in our family, isn't one to mince words. But I laughed. "I'll do better next time," I said.

And I plan to. But in the mean time, I'm making my contribution to NCPR. Because, like you, I have my morning listening rituals. They mean a lot to me, and to my little sister.

Truth, art

March 16th, 2012 by Sarah Harris

The internet has been abuzz since "This American Life" retracted Mike Daisey's Apple manufacturing story on the grounds that it contained "significant fabrications."

In response, Daisey issued the following statement:

"I stand by my work. My show is a theatrical piece whose goal is to create a human connection between our gorgeous devices and the brutal circumstances from which they emerge. It uses a combination of fact, memoir, and dramatic license to tell its story, and I believe it does so with integrity. Certainly, the comprehensive investigations undertaken by The New York Times and a number of labor rights groups to document conditions in electronics manufacturing would seem to bear this out.

What I do is not journalism. The tools of the theater are not the same as the tools of journalism. For this reason, I regret that I allowed THIS AMERICAN LIFE to air an excerpt from my monologue. THIS AMERICAN LIFE is essentially a journalistic ­- not a theatrical ­- enterprise, and as such it operates under a different set of rules and expectations. But this is my only regret. I am proud that my work seems to have sparked a growing storm of attention and concern over the often appalling conditions under which many of the high-tech products we love so much are assembled in China."

I in no way want to diminish the enormous gaffe by Daisey and "This American Life" both. It raises some really important ethical questions. But I also think Daisey's defense is interesting because it differentiates between the rules for storytellers and the rules for journalists. Journalists have a very clear obligation to tell the truth, all the time. For storytellers, memoirists and non-fiction writers, it's a little different. They can take creative license, tweaking words and facts and anecdotes, in order to arrive at a better articulation of a true idea.

Journalism, done well, employs all the practices of good storytelling and the rigor required by fact checking. "This American Life" is an interesting venue for this to play out because it's easy to forget that what they do is journalism. When I think of "This American Life," I think of an outlet renowned for its great storytelling. The thing is–the stories are true.

Remember Greg Mortenson, author of Three Cups of Tea? How about James Frey, who wrote A Million Little Pieces? Both authors published highly acclaimed and widely-read books, and both were heavily criticized when the public learned that they'd fabricated some of their material. My question to you, blog readers: how does this impact the quality of their works? Are they any any less good?

I took a literature class in college called "Truth and Other Fictions." We read writers who blurred the line between memory and the present, between truth and lies, reality and constructions. The human mind is pretty complex, and sometimes, if you tell yourself something over and over again, it can become true. If you think this is interesting stuff, here are some further musings on the intersections and disparities between art and fact.

Mikey Daisey is scheduled to perform at the Flynn in Burlington on March 31st. I've been meaning to buy my ticket all week and will certainly do so this evening. Because, true or no, Mike Daisey tells a good story.

"This American Life" retracts major story about Apple

March 16th, 2012 by Brian Mann

One of the top journalists in public radio, Ira Glass, has announced that This American Life is retracting a major story about ethical manufacturing in China.

"We're retracting the story because we can’t vouch for its truth," Glass said in a statement, asserting that the producer of the piece, Mike Daisey, lied to the show during fact-checking.

"Daisey lied to me and to This American Life producer Brian Reed during the fact checking we did on the story, before it was broadcast. That doesn't excuse the fact that we never should've put this on the air. In the end, this was our mistake."

A major stumble for a great American news program.

As a reporter, though, here's what I find interesting.  Glass is devoting this weekend's program (which airs on NCPR Sunday at 11 am, with a repeat on Fridays) to exploring their own inaccuracy, their own journalistic fumble.

Which gets at, in my view, the fundamental aspect of journalism that many people (including far too many reporters and editors) don't understand.

We will make mistakes.  We will get facts wrong.  We will, on occasion, screw up mightily.  I've done all these things.

The test of a news organization's mettle is in the honesty and forthrightness of the correction.  That's the acid test.  Do you have the guts and the integrity to admit that you screwed up?

Do you look over your editorial practices to find out how to avoid similar mistakes in the future?  Do you make things right with the people whose stories you got wrong?

So far, Ira Glass is doing the right things.  We'll find out on Sunday whether his mea culpa sets the record straight.

Flashback: In 2009 Limbaugh accused Scozzafava of "widespread bestiality"

March 5th, 2012 by Brian Mann

Rush Limbaugh faces a growing storm of criticism for his "slut-shaming" attack on Georgetown student Sandra Fluke.

His days-long tirade included Limbaugh asking where the young woman got her condoms "in the sixth grade" and suggesting that she was having so much sex that he was surprised she could still walk.

The talk radio host also urged Ms. Fluke to post videos of herself having sex.

If this sounds like a place we've all been before, it's because Limbaugh launched a similarly venomous attack at then-Republican Assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava, from Governeur, in 2009.

Scozzafava was the GOP's chosen candidate in the 23rd district special election that year and Limbaugh — like many conservatives — viewed her as too moderate.

"We can say that she's guilty of widespread bestiality," Limbaugh said.  "She has screwed every RINO in the country." (Hear the audio below.)

That incident backfired for Limbaugh, too.  When asked by a reporter about the slur, Conservative candidate Doug Hoffman laughed and declined to condemn the remarks.

But Democrat Bill Owens quickly issued a strongly-worded statement, calling Limbaugh's attacks "despicable" and saying that he was "personally" offended.

“Assemblywoman Scozzafava is an honorable public servant," Owens said.

"Rush Limbaugh and the rest of the right wing special interests that are running Hoffman’s campaign can’t even begin to compete with what she has accomplished over her career.”

Scozzafava went on to endorse Owens and the Democrat won the upset over Hoffman by roughly 3,500 votes.  Did Limbaugh's toxic rhetoric make the difference?  Probably not.  But it's hard to believe that it helped.