Posts Tagged ‘transportation’

Lake Champlain bridge opening festival this weekend

May 18th, 2012 by Brian Mann

The new Lake Champlain bridge span being lifted into place (Photo: Brian Mann)

This weekend marks the official grand opening of the Lake Champlain bridge from Crown Point to Addison, Vermont.  Nearly three years after the old bridge was condemned and closed to traffic, the new span will see two days of dances, parades, music, and a flotilla on lake.

The key-note speaker at the gathering will be Ted Zoli, the designer of the new bridge, who grew up in Glens Falls.   The bash will end Sunday night with a fireworks show.

The bridge will be closed for about an hour around 11 am on Saturday for one part of the celebration, which will mean traffic delays in the area.

According to the Addison County Independent newspaper, as many as 10,000 people are expected to attend the two-day festival.  I'll be there and will have more on this story Monday morning.

For a complete schedule of events, go here.

Morning Read: Easier train travel between Montreal and North Country?

May 14th, 2012 by Brian Mann

Amtrak train 69, The Adirondack. Photo: Adam E. Moreira

It may soon be just a little bit easier to take the Amtrak train north to Montreal, according to Senator Charles Schumer's office.  This from the Associated Press.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Canadian officials have tentatively agreed to end the two-hour inspection and screening delays at St. Lambert in Quebec.

The deal still needs final U.S. and Canadian approval. But new screening facilities in Montreal are being built for Customs and Border Patrol agents to complete prescreenings and end the need to stop at St. Lambert.

Schumer says Amtrak has agreed to no longer making the extra stop once the new facilities are approved and operating.

The North Country Chamber of Commerce says the move is a major economic step toward creating what it calls border fluidity.

Making the trip a bit quicker might make it…feasible.  Currently, a train ride from Plattsburgh to Montreal takes about four hours and gets you into the city at 7pm.  That trip includes a nearly two-hour stop at the border.

By car, the drive takes about an hour and fifteen minutes.

Morning Read: Second-guessing the Rooftop Highway-I98

April 12th, 2012 by Brian Mann

2001 Rooftop Highway Study Map (click to enlarge)

St. Lawrence County is asking local governments around the North Country to chime in with support for a proposed interstate highway that would link Plattsburgh and Watertown, but not everyone is climbing aboard.

This week, town officials in Malone tabled the request, in part because they don't think funding is available for the project.  This from the Plattsburgh Press-Republican.

Village Board members support the concept of Interstate 98, which has also been known as the "Northern Tier Expressway" and the "Rooftop Highway."

But they don't believe there is state or federal funding available to connect Watertown to Rouses Point by a 170-mile roadway that is estimated to cost $3 billion to $4 billion.

The response in Tupper Lake was even more frosty, with town officials arguing that the highway could divert traffic and economic activity away from their community.  This from the Adirondack Daily Enterprise.

"I do not support that because of businesses,"[town supervisor Roger] Amell said. "Right now, Route 3 is our corridor from Watertown to Plattsburgh."

He said if more traffic is directed to the northern route, fewer people will use Route 3. He compared it to when the Northway, I-87, was built and businesses along Route 9 lost customers.

Other board members agreed.

"It just diverts traffic," said Councilman David Tomberlin.

"I definitely want to keep as much activity in our direction as possible," said Councilwoman Patti Littlefield.

At issue currently is whether $6.3 million in funds set aside for preliminary I-98 work in 2005 should be used for that purpose, or redirected to improve Rt. 11, as state officials have proposed.

On April 4th, the Watertown Daily Times reported that thw village of Massena supported St. Lawrence County's resolution, urging the Transportation Departmenet to repair Rt. 11 while also beginning work in the Rooftop Highway.

So what do you think?  Is I-98 a good long-term investment for this $6.3 million pot of money, or should it go to more immediate transportation needs?

Update/Correction: NYS folds on tough state ballast water restrictions

February 24th, 2012 by Brian Mann

This morning, I reported that the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation is blasting Federal officials for proposing new ballast water treatment rules that DEC commissioner Joe Martens describes as neither adequate nor effective.

I also reported that DEC is also moving to implement its own standards, which are roughly 100 times more stringent.

Turns out I only had the story half right.

It's true that Martens sent the letter to EPA administrator Lisa Jackson offering a laundry list of complaints about the proposed new rules and calling for them to be toughtened.

But in a separate press release issued Wednesday, which I hadn't seen, the commissioner also announced that he's shelving New York state's tough rules, which were scheduled to go into effect next year.

"A technically feasible national standard which recognizes the critical economic role played by our waterways is the only viable way to address the spread of destructive aquatic invaders through ballast water," Martens said.

Martens suggests that New York state plans to negotiate to try to toughen Federal rules, bringing them closer to the guidelines originally proposed by the DEC.

But in unilaterally shelving the proposed DEC rules, state officials in Albany have already effectively given up their biggest bargaining chip.

"New York remains concerned about the introduction and spread of invasive species in the state's waterways and we hope that a strong national solution can be achieved," DEC Commissioner Joe Martens said.

"At the same time, shipping and maritime activity is critical to New York state and international commerce. A technically feasible national standard which recognizes the critical economic role played by our waterways is the only viable way to address the spread of destructive aquatic invaders through ballast water."

New York's decision to shelve its ballast regs drew quick raves from opponents of the ballast water rules.  Industry groups and the Canadian government both praised the decision.

"New York's decision effectively eliminates the unworkable ballast water rules put in place during the Paterson Administration. We applaud Governor Cuomo for protecting jobs and supporting the thousands of Americans who make their living in the maritime industry," said Steve Fisher, Executive Director of the American Great Lakes Ports Association, in a statemente.

"Canada applauds New York State for withdrawing its unattainable ballast water requirements and agrees that uniform standards are the best way to protect the marine environment," said Parliamentary Secretary Poilievre, who handles transportation issues for Canada.

"We welcome this action as enforcement of the rules on transiting ships would have stopped commercial shipping on the Seaway. This could have affected almost $11 billion in business revenue and up to 72,000 jobs in Canada and the United States."

Meanwhile, the DEC's decision is a setback for environmental groups, who had hoped that New York state's tough rules would serve as leverage to elevate national standards.  This from Reuters:

"The EPA's new proposed permit isn't tough enough to prevent the next harmful invader from slipping into our waters," said Thom Cmar of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Several technologies exist to treat ballast water, which Cmar said are similar to municipal wastewater treatment that cleans water with chemicals, ultraviolet light, or filtration systems. He said it would cost less than $1 million to outfit a typical cargo vessel.

More on this story Monday during The Eight O'clock Hour.

Morning Read: NY battles Feds on ballast water invasive species rules

February 23rd, 2012 by Brian Mann

New York state has faced intense political pressure to scrap tough ballast water rules designed to keep invasive species out of Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River.

Canada and other Great Lakes states hate New York's rules, which require that ballast water be 100 times cleaner than currently required under international standards.

The EPA and the Coast Guard have now released their own proposed rules, but NY Conservation Commissioner Joe Martens says they don't go far enough.

"In general we do not believe that the [proposed regulations] provide an effective or adequate standard to address the known risks of [invasive species] nor does it reflect the best available technology," Martens wrote, in a letter dated February 21.

Martens' position is supported by environmental groups throughout the Great Lakes region, according to a report in the Watertown Daily Times.

In a joint news release, Great Lakes area conservation groups — including Natural Resources Defense Council, National Wildlife Federation, Great Lakes United, Alliance for the Great Lakes and Northwest Environmental Advocates — blasted the EPA Tuesday for “failing to uphold its federal Clean Water Act duty to protect the Great Lakes and other U.S. waters from the introduction and spread of invasive species.”

The EPA rules are likely to draw better reviews from industry groups and from other states, convinced that less stringent ballast standards are adequate and more affordable.

DOT: Champlain Bridge cracks nothing to worry about

January 31st, 2012 by Martha Foley

You probably haven’t noticed them as you’re enjoying the view from the new Crown Point Bridge.

But the Plattsburgh Press Republican reported this morning that there are hairline cracks in the concrete abutments of the graceful new span.

Pedestrians took over both lanes for grand opening of the Lake Champlian Bridge in November. Photo by Mark Kurtz.

The paper says you can see some of the cracks in the pillars with the naked eye.

Not to worry, the NYSDOT says the cracks are nothing to worry about, and don’t need fixing. They’re considered “routine” in new concrete.

There is superficial hairline concrete cracking, which routinely occurs on all newly poured concrete bridges. Such hairline cracks are normal and do not affect the safety or structural integrity of the bridge.

According to the Press Republican, traffic across the news bridge is about 3400 vehicles  a day. The loss of the 1929 span had forced all those commuters, tourists, cyclists and neighbors to take the very long way around the long, skinny lake.

It was no wonder the new bridge was greeted with joy on both sides of the Lake when it opened in November, barely over two years after the old bridge was abruptly declared unsafe at any speed, or weight, and closed for good.

Afternoon Read: So which will it be, Adirondacks? Rails or trails?

January 30th, 2012 by Brian Mann

The Albany Times-Union is wading into the debate over how legacy railroad lines should be used in the Adirondacks.

The newspaper focuses primarily on the fight in the Tri-Lakes region, where some activists want the railbed from Lake Placid to Old Forge turned into a multi-use trail.

"This trail is the ideal alternative to a failed railroad," said Jim McCulley, president of Lake Placid Snowmobile Club and a member of the new Adirondack Recreation Trail Advocates. He said the cash-strapped state has little prospect of paying to upgrade the 80-mile stretch, so aging rails likely will remain useless for years.

Between 2007 and 2010, the society got more than $900,000 in support from the state Department of Transportation and still lost more than $66,000 running the line. "The moment the state subsidy stops, they cannot even turn on the lights," McCulley said.

This narrative infuriates train buffs and their supporters, who see railroads as an important asset, not just for tourism.

Railway Society Vice President J. Alan Heywood said such thinking is shortsighted. "We have had limited success, but it is not fair to be judged by a track that is a third done," he said. "We have almost reached critical mass. I used to give dates when we would have the entire line repaired, but every one of them has been wrong. It could still take years. A decade would be my goal."

…And he said the rail line will become more important in future years, if the price of gasoline rises. "Once those rails are gone, getting them back in is unlikely," he said.

Railroad fans argue that this debate is nonsensical, given the fact that state officials have shown no appetite for abandoning the tracks or converting them into a recreational path.  But path advocates have been successful at keeping the issue alive.

What do you think?  Is this a timely debate?

Adirondack airport debate highlights region's balkanization

January 16th, 2012 by Brian Mann

I've been reporting on the heated debate over the future of the Adirondack regional airport, in Harrietstown, which boasts significant growth in passenger flights, while also facing real questions about its future viability.

Interviewing local officials about the airport, I stumbled once again against the incredible fragmentation in local government and leadership — a fragmentation that often pits neighboring communities in the North Country against one-another.

Where the airport is concerned, some officials in Harriestown and Saranac Lake are convinced that the facility warrants big regional support.

Chamber of Commerce director Sylvie Nelson says thousands of  tourists and business travelers fly in every year and quickly disperse to places like Lake Placid, Upper Saranac Lake, and Tupper Lake.

"Adirondack regional airport is one of the economic drivers in our region," Nelson argues.

But just a few miles away, leaders in North Elba and Tupper Lake are skeptical.  They are busy with other concerns and aren't interested in adding another big project to their already cash-strapped budgets.

North Elba town supervisor Roby Politi points out that his community is also focused on supporting its own small airport.

And by the time you get to the county seats in Malone and Elizabethtown, the idea of supporting a regional airport an hour's drive away can seem like a distant and far-fetched concept.

Why should lawmakers representing taxpayers in places like Schroon Lake and Fort Covington vote to support a facility their constituents will likely never use or directly benefit from?

But of course, the same can be said for many of the big projects that come up for debate in our far-flung communities.

Why should taxpayers in Saranac Lake (which makes up a big part of North Elba) chip in to support the Olympic Regional Development Authority, as they do currently — to the tune of more than $900,000 a year?

Why should taxpayers in North Elba (which has its own nursing home) chip in to support the county run facility in Elizabethtown?

Why should taxpayers in distant parts of Essex and Franklin Counties pay for expensive improvements to the North Country Community College Campus in Saranac Lake?

What about the Adirondack Scenic Railroad?  Even within the relatively compact Tri-Lakes region, people see the project very differently, with folks in Lake Placid viewing the project as a boondoggle and folks in Tupper Lake seeing it as a hopeful venture.

And what about the so-called "rooftop highway"?  Is that an important regional venture that we should all get behind, or a backyard issue that matters only to a narrow strip of towns in northern Clinton, Franklin and St. Lawrence counties?

What's clear is that, going forward, many of these big projects will need regional support to succeed.

Taken separately, our tiny towns and hamlets just don't have the budgets or the expertise to run regional airports or pay for tourist trains.

So how do we begin to think about these priorities and trade-offs collectively?  How do we decide which projects have economic benefits that go beyond our little valley or bend in the road?

During my trip this winter to Canada, I found that communities north of the border seem to be doing a better job thinking regionally, trying to put the economic pieces together in a way that is both affordable and brings benefits the biggest area.

The North Country Regional Economic Development Council may be a step toward developing that kind of big-picture thinking.

"I think it was a sigh of relief in terms of being able to work together," said Bill Farber, head of the Hamilton County board of supervisors, referring to the Council's efforts.

"I think it was a sigh of relief that there wasn't the level of parochialism that some people were concerned with."

Perhaps local leaders are waking up to the notion that they can't fly solo anymore, especially as state and Federal subsidies for their operations continue to shrink.

When Harrietstown supervisor Larry Miller says "We can't do this alone," he's talking about one airport in the Adirondacks.  But he could just as well be talking about dozens of projects across the North Country.

Morning Read: Freight train into Adk High Peaks sparks debate

January 11th, 2012 by Brian Mann

A plan to reopen a historic freight line that extends from North Creek to the old Tahawus mine on the eastern slopes of the High Peaks is sparking more controversy and debate.

The Glens Falls Post Star is reporting that more environmental activists are considering trying to block the project.

"We believe Protect has raised some important issues of ownership, compatibility, environmental impact and legal precedent with regard to the plan to reopen the spur all of the way to Tahawus," John Sheehan, spokesman for the Adirondack Council…

The group has already drawn opposition from the group Protect the Adirondacks, and sparked questions from state Environment officials.

Meanwhile, local officials in Essex County voted this week unanimously to support the project, according to the Adirondack Daily Enterprise.

"I think it is crazy that the environmentalists are out there wanting to tear the tracks up on that line that is so important to the economic recovery in that area," said Moriah town Supervisor Tom Scozzafava.

According to Scozzafava, his community lost about 7 miles of rail years ago "because the town at that time did not have enough foresight to see the importance that that railroad may have played in our economic recovery."

Trains have emerged as a new flashpoint in the debate over the Adirondack Park's future, with active scrums now underway over this freight line, and over the future of a tourism train operated in the Tri-Lakes region.

Did Harrietstown officials really lose 4,000 gallons of gas at the Adirondack airport?

January 10th, 2012 by Brian Mann

A scathing report from New York state's Comptroller, issued Tuesday, claims that Harrietstown officials mismanaged capital projects and bungled the accounting for fuel sales at the Adirondack Regional Airport in Lake Clear.

One of the conclusions in the document is that town officials "could not account for" nearly three thousand gallons of Jet A fuel, and another thousand gallons of aviation grade gasoline, with a cash value totaling roughly $15,000.

The Comptroller study also found lax oversight for millions of dollars worth of capital projects.

“At a time when local governments should be paying even closer attention to their finances, our audit identified numerous financial missteps that went undetected for many years,” DiNapoli said, in a press statement.

His office went on to argue that mismanagement of airport projects left a $200,000 "hole" in the town's general fund.

In a letter written in mid-December, Harrietstown supervisor Larry Miller acknowledged that "discrepancies existed" in fuel tank inventories.

But he blamed problems with the set up of the fuel tanks and suggested that temperature changes at the site might also have affected the measurements.

Miller conceded that changes needed to be made.  "The Town Board acknowledges that airport management did not keep inventory records for unleaded gas and diesel fuels and understands the necessity to do so," Miller wrote.

Management was a major issue during last November's budget session in Harrietstown, according to the Adirondack Daily Enterprise.

Several speakers lamented that the Adirondack Regional Airport has become too big a drain on town taxpayers. The Lake Clear airport's budget for 2012 is over $2 million and will cost taxpayers about $273,600.

Supporters of the airport say it generates millions of dollars worth of economic benefit for the Adirondack region, and they point to growing ridership on Cape Air's commuter flights.

This Comptroller's report is sure to revive the debate over the airport, its value to the community, its management, and its future.