{"id":11171,"date":"2013-09-11T09:15:12","date_gmt":"2013-09-11T13:15:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/?p=11171"},"modified":"2013-10-22T08:10:16","modified_gmt":"2013-10-22T12:10:16","slug":"railroad-feud-when-bureaucrats-school-the-public","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/2013\/09\/11\/railroad-feud-when-bureaucrats-school-the-public\/","title":{"rendered":"Railroad feud: when bureaucrats school the public"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_11173\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/files\/2013\/09\/train-hearings-2.jpg\"><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-11173\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-11173\" alt=\"train hearings 2\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/files\/2013\/09\/train-hearings-2-300x168.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"168\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/files\/2013\/09\/train-hearings-2-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/files\/2013\/09\/train-hearings-2-150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/files\/2013\/09\/train-hearings-2-450x253.jpg 450w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-11173\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A crowd packs a meeting room in Ray Brook to offer widely different views about the Adirondack rail corridor. Photo: Brian Mann<\/p><\/div>\n<p>This week, I&#8217;ve gone spelunking in the wild, ferocious world of the Adirondack rail-trail debate.\u00a0 Trust me, it&#8217;s a rabbit hole of zeal and rhetoric that Lewis Carroll couldn&#8217;t have dreamed up.<\/p>\n<p>Because I live in the Adirondacks and have good friends on both sides of the debate, my Facebook page and my email box are full of people chiming in and sounding off.<\/p>\n<p>The trouble here isn&#8217;t that people have strong opinions.\u00a0 That&#8217;s great.\u00a0 In fact, I think the debate has inspired both sides to come up better, more exciting ideas.<\/p>\n<p>The problem is that both sides &#8212; those who want a new recreational trail and those who want a refurbished tourism train &#8212; have gotten downright mean, each accusing the other at various times of dishonesty, bullying and mean spiritedness.<\/p>\n<p>Remember what&#8217;s at stake here.\u00a0 Two essentially fun ideas about a really cool asset in the Adirondacks.<\/p>\n<p>And remember that both sides have legitimate arguments to make, the one camp pushing for a vision of a rail line that ferries visitors into the heart of the Adirondack wilderness, the other camp pushing for a less costly multi-use trail that would also open new kinds of access.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, both sides have stretched their arguments on occasion, picking and choosing numbers to fit the story they&#8217;re trying to tell.\u00a0 But no more than people always do when trying to win a debate.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve seen plenty of spin here, but no outright deception and nothing I would describe as underhanded &#8212; from either faction.\u00a0 Both groups, in fact, clearly believe that their narrative is true.<\/p>\n<p>Which brings us to this week.<\/p>\n<p>State officials decided not to buy into the us-versus-them-take-no-prisoners narrative that&#8217;s been brewing.<\/p>\n<p>Instead of holding a series of rail corridor meetings where people spouted off and hissed at each other, repeating the same old arguments, the DEC and DOT held a much more holistic series of planning meetings.<\/p>\n<p>Participants broke up into small groups.\u00a0 The public had an opportunity to\u00a0 talk one-on-one with state experts from the Conservation and Transportation departments, offering their opinions, sharing their views of the facts.<\/p>\n<p>I heard a few people complaining about the format, some passionately.\u00a0 They demanded an old school forum.\u00a0 They demanded that their questions and suspicions be addressed immediately.<\/p>\n<p>And I get it.\u00a0 Normally, I&#8217;m not a huge fan of bureaucrats trying to stage manage events like this, but as far as I could see the exercise actually worked.<\/p>\n<p>People had a chance to be heard and to shape an important public discussion, without raising the temperature even higher.<\/p>\n<p>So this is one case where maybe the public can take a page from the government bureaucrats.\u00a0 Take a deep breath.\u00a0 Remember that the people on the &#8220;other side&#8221; are actually your neighbors and friends.<\/p>\n<p>Remember that we&#8217;re talking about a tourism rail corridor, not the future of Mideast peace.<\/p>\n<p>And do your best to listen and to think hard about your own positions and your own tone.\u00a0 Remember that, whatever your position, you&#8217;re asking the other camp to make some big, painful concessions.<\/p>\n<p>Train supporters are asking the public to pony up a lot of money to pay for their vision of a tourism railroad that runs through the heart of the wilderness.\u00a0 And to trust them with another decade or so of management of this valuable corridor.\u00a0 That&#8217;s big.<\/p>\n<p>Trail supporters, meanwhile, are asking people who care deeply about this train line &#8212; its history, its potential &#8212; to give up a dream that they&#8217;ve struggled mightily to bring to life.\u00a0 That&#8217;s huge.<\/p>\n<p>I could be wrong, but I suspect that the &#8220;winning&#8221; side here will be the one that shows the most humor, compassion, and flexibility as this process moves forward.<\/p>\n<p>I know this sounds like a full-blown finger wag.\u00a0 And yeah, guilty as charged.\u00a0 But of all the big public debates I&#8217;ve covered in the Adirondacks, this may be the one that has the least credible rationale for ugliness and vitriol.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This week, I&#8217;ve gone spelunking in the wild, ferocious world of the Adirondack rail-trail debate.\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[13435],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11171"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11171"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11171\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12363,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11171\/revisions\/12363"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}