{"id":2108,"date":"2010-05-16T07:51:49","date_gmt":"2010-05-16T11:51:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/?p=2108"},"modified":"2010-05-16T07:59:13","modified_gmt":"2010-05-16T11:59:13","slug":"the-tea-partys-worst-idea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/2010\/05\/16\/the-tea-partys-worst-idea\/","title":{"rendered":"The tea party&#8217;s worst idea"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve spent a lot of time reporting on the tea party over the last year, finding some intriguing and positive elements to the movement, and some troubling and ugly aspects as well.<\/p>\n<p>But of all the actual ideas being put forward by conservative activists, the worst may be the idea of repealing the 17th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>That was the amendment, ratified in 1913, that ended the practice of state legislatures choosing United States Senators.  <\/p>\n<p>Before it was passed, voters had no direct involvement in choosing the 100 lawmakers who make up the most powerful legislative body in our country.<\/p>\n<p>For conservatives, there is a very clear logic to this step backward:  empowering the states.<\/p>\n<p>If they have their way, the Senate won&#8217;t in fact reflect the will of the people, it will reflect the sovereignty and authority of the fifty individual US states.<\/p>\n<p>Tea Party activists also argue that the idea is worth reviving because that&#8217;s how the founding fathers wanted it.<\/p>\n<p>But let&#8217;s be clear:  the founding fathers embedded a lot of terrible ideas in the Constitution, including slavery and the denial of voting rights to women.<\/p>\n<p>There are so many problems with the proposal to repeal the 17th amendment that it&#8217;s hard to know where to begin, but just for fun let&#8217;s start in Albany.<\/p>\n<p>If conservatives had their way, our state legislature &#8212; the most dysfunctional in the United States &#8212; would have sole authority to decide who represents us in Washington DC.<\/p>\n<p>This is a legislature that can&#8217;t even pass a budget, where scandals and indictments are an accepted part of the culture.<\/p>\n<p>And Albany is hardly unique.  Legislatures from Alaska to Florida are no better.   <\/p>\n<p>Anyone who thinks that corruption, backroom dealing, and gridlock are the solve provinces of our nation&#8217;s capital hasn&#8217;t been paying attention.<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s more there&#8217;s a lot of evidence that the old system worked horribly.  <\/p>\n<p>State lawmakers often went years at a time without choosing a new Senator, leaving their people without national representation.<\/p>\n<p>From 1901 until 1903, the state of Delaware had no US Senators at all because the state&#8217;s legislature was stalemated over the question.<\/p>\n<p>There are some in our country who believe that the virtues of Federalism &#8212; a system that includes a far more decentralized national government &#8212; outweigh these problems.<\/p>\n<p>They are wrong.<\/p>\n<p>Under the current system, each state&#8217;s voters gets to make a choice about their representation.  <\/p>\n<p>If they want to elect leaders who want a weaker national government and more state&#8217;s rights, they are free to do so.<\/p>\n<p>The US Senate is already the least representative legislature in any democracy in the world.<\/p>\n<p>Because it doesn&#8217;t grant seats based on population &#8212; instead, each state gets two seats regardless of size &#8212; small states like Vermont receive 38 times more clout in the Senate per capita than big states like New York.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s already a huge redistribution of power.<\/p>\n<p>If we backtrack to an antebellum, good-old-boy system for choosing our lawmakers, then the Senate will have lost almost all connection to the people it represents.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve spent a lot of time reporting on the tea party over the last year, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2108"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2108"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2108\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2109,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2108\/revisions\/2109"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2108"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2108"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2108"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}