{"id":265,"date":"2008-11-17T12:02:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-17T16:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/2008\/11\/17\/election-post-op-part-two-americas-new-status-quo\/"},"modified":"2008-11-17T12:02:00","modified_gmt":"2008-11-17T16:02:00","slug":"election-post-op-part-two-americas-new-status-quo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/2008\/11\/17\/election-post-op-part-two-americas-new-status-quo\/","title":{"rendered":"Election Post-Op, Part Two: America&#8217;s new status quo?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We&#8217;ve been reporting for a long time on America&#8217;s remarkably divided political landscape.  People debate whether the U.S. is center-left or center-right and the answer, obviously, is Yes.<\/p>\n<p>In much of rural America, the values remain complexly but staunchly conservative.  Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported from Ochiltree County, Texas &#8212; a place I&#8217;ve visited. <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Some people here still can&#8217;t quite believe that President-elect Barack Obama won the White House; they consider him inexperienced and too liberal. &#8220;I had one fellow ask me, &#8216;Has the whole country gone slap dab crazy?,&#8221; says Jim Hudson, publisher of the Perryton Herald.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>But in many urban and suburban communities &#8212; where 80% of Americans live &#8212; the zeitgeist is remarkably progressive.  Here&#8217;s the take from conservative writer Tod Lindberg, writing for the Washington Post.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Nowadays, it&#8217;s a fair bet that most of those calling themselves &#8220;liberal&#8221; support gay <i>marriage<\/i>. In 1980, those same liberals were, no doubt, cutting-edge supporters of gay rights, but the notion of same-sex marriage would have occurred only to the most avant-garde.<\/p>\n<p>In 1980, having a teenage daughter who was pregnant out of wedlock would have ruled you out for the No. 2 spot on the <i>Democratic<\/i> ticket. This year, it turned out to be a humanizing addition to the conservative vice presidential nominee&#8217;s r\u00e9sum\u00e9.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Normally, this sort of polarization would suggest changeability and the swinging of political pendulums.  Not this time.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s a sense in political circles that a new electoral map is hardening, with Democrats staking out a clear and perhaps durable advantage.<\/p>\n<p>The trouble for Republicans is that they have effectively maximized their constituency.  <br \/>Using aggressive redistricting and new marketing strategies, the GOP seized as many congressional districts (and Electoral College votes) as possible during the 1980s and 1990s.<\/p>\n<p>They also spent a quarter-century gleefully converting Boll Weevil Democrats in the South into die-hard Republicans.  But now those &#8220;easy&#8221; pick-ups have all been pocketed. <\/p>\n<p>Democrats, too, have largely staked out their natural territory &#8212; but at the end of the day the Dems enjoy a thirty-seat advantage in the House and at least a seven-vote margin in the US Senate.<\/p>\n<p>They control far more state houses and governorships than the Republicans.  And they appear to have captured the imagination of the next generation of voters.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Here&#8217;s the stark reality,&#8221; writes Lindberg.  &#8220;It is now harder for the Republican presidential candidate to get to 50.1 percent than for the Democrat.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>What this means is that Republicans can no longer hope to activate an eager, silent majority out there.  They can&#8217;t &#8220;govern from their base.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Instead, they&#8217;ll have to find ideas and arguments that speak compellingly to voters in center-center districts, places like upstate New York. <\/p>\n<p>They&#8217;ll have to reshape the rural-white &#8220;Joe the Plumber&#8221; stuff in a form that crosses ethnic, gender and geographic boundaries.<\/p>\n<p>Otherwise, the new status quo could be, well, static for a long time to come.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We&#8217;ve been reporting for a long time on America&#8217;s remarkably divided political landscape. People debate [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=265"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}