{"id":3403,"date":"2010-12-17T14:20:19","date_gmt":"2010-12-17T19:20:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/?p=3403"},"modified":"2010-12-20T11:07:53","modified_gmt":"2010-12-20T16:07:53","slug":"epa-tells-ge-to-dig-deeper","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/2010\/12\/17\/epa-tells-ge-to-dig-deeper\/","title":{"rendered":"EPA tells GE to dig deeper"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The federal agency is out with requirements for the next phase of the clean up of PCBs flushed into the Hudson River for decades by the company&#8217;s plants in Ft. Edward.<\/p>\n<p>From the EPA press release:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The second phase of the cleanup \u2013 which is designed to address potentially cancer-causing chemicals released for decades from two GE plants into the Hudson \u2013 would require GE to remove far more contaminated sediment from the river before sealing or \u201ccapping\u201d any remaining PCBs.\u00a0 The decision follows months of consultation with GE, the State of New York and a wide range of stakeholder groups as the Agency analyzed technical information and decided how best to proceed with the second phase of the project. GE has until January 14, 2011 to review EPA\u2019s decision and notify the Agency whether they will proceed with this phase of the cleanup, scheduled to begin in May 2011.<\/p>\n<p>GE plants discharged approximately 1.3 million pounds of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) during a 30 period ending in 1977, contaminating nearly 200 miles of the Hudson River. These potentially cancer-causing chemicals can build up in fish over time, posing a serious risk to those who eat them.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019ve said from the start that a clean Hudson is non-negotiable, and the path we have laid out today relies on the best science to ensure this dangerous pollution is addressed in an effective way,\u201d said EPA Region 2 Administrator Judith Enck. \u201cEPA has advanced a PCB cleanup plan that will require the removal of huge quantities of PCBs, making the Hudson River cleaner for future generations.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Dredging during the second phase will go deeper into the sediment and, by relying on better information and lessons learned during the first phase, will remove more contaminated sediment in fewer passes.\u00a0 Phase two will require GE to remove an estimated 95 percent or more of PCBs from the areas designated for dredging.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The Natural Rescources Defense Council sent this statement:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cToday\u2019s announcement is a compromise. Under these cleanup standards, there\u2019s no doubt we\u2019ll have a much cleaner and healthier Hudson River than we do today \u2013 but in nearly a quarter of the remaining cleanup area, G.E. will still be allowed to cover over toxic waste that could be removed, with the ongoing risk of it being stirred up once again in the years to come. The spotlight is now on G.E. to move forward without delay and to do nothing less than these standards require once the cleanup begins.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As the first phase began in 2009, Brian Mann went to the banks of the Hudson\u00a0 to report <a href=\"http:\/\/www.northcountrypublicradio.org\/news\/story\/13558\/dredging-begins-on-upper-hudson-after-decades-of-pcb-debate\">this story<\/a>. It&#8217;s an in-depth look at the the years-long epic, as it stood in May of that year. There&#8217;s lots more reporting at ncpr.org. Try our site search, under GE clean up.\u00a0 (Advance apologies for the clunky search engine.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The federal agency is out with requirements for the next phase of the clean up [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[22,884,4857,4858,4859],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3403"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3403"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3403\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3404,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3403\/revisions\/3404"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}