{"id":448,"date":"2009-01-26T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-26T16:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/2009\/01\/26\/dowd-v-gillibrand\/"},"modified":"2009-01-26T12:00:00","modified_gmt":"2009-01-26T16:00:00","slug":"dowd-v-gillibrand","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/2009\/01\/26\/dowd-v-gillibrand\/","title":{"rendered":"Dowd v. Gillibrand"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>No one in America goes postal on women politicians like Maureen Dowd.  <\/p>\n<p>Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, Nancy Pelosi, Condoleezza Rice &#8211; they&#8217;ve all felt the lash of Dowd&#8217;s whip.<\/p>\n<p>Over the weekend, the NY Times columnist dipped her pen in curare and tried to write an epitaph for New York&#8217;s new Senator, Kirsten Gillibrand, dubbing her an &#8220;NRA handmaiden&#8221; and &#8220;a pain.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Gillibrand is, gasp, &#8220;opportunistic and sharp elbowed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And yet Dowd also suggests that Sen. Chuck Schumer pushed Gillibrand as a candidate primarily because she would be satisfied in the second-fiddle position.<\/p>\n<p>Caroline Kennedy &#8212; the &#8220;best choice&#8221; for the Senate, whom Governor David Paterson &#8220;strangled&#8221; &#8212; would have eclipsed Schumer with her Camelotian star-power.<\/p>\n<p>Dowd&#8217;s column is so full of faux-Algonquinian quips and barbs that it&#8217;s hard to sort out any real argument against Gillibrand.<\/p>\n<p>She points out that the Congresswoman from the 20th Congregssional district voted against President Bush&#8217;s now-discredited stimulus package &#8212; failing to note that it was a prescient and popular decision.<\/p>\n<p>Dowd suggests that Gillibrand is a pawn of sorts in some Olympian rivalry between the Clintons and the Kennedys.<\/p>\n<p>The whole thing is so depressingly junior-high that it&#8217;s hard to engage, but here are a couple of points.<\/p>\n<p>The notion that Caroline Kennedy was ever a viable option has become impossible to sustain.  <\/p>\n<p>Kennedy simply couldn&#8217;t make any case for herself.  Period.  Full stop.  She loafed around and sort of shrugged and quibbled and then withdrew.  <\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s the kind of behavior that would have eclipsed Chuck Schumer?  Does Maureen Dowd remember that Sen. Schumer is the man who just engineered a nearly filibuster-proof majority in the Senate?  <\/p>\n<p>What Schumer wants, patently, is someone who can hold this Senate seat in 2010 and again in 2012.  He, like Paterson, is clearly convinced that Gillibrand has a great shot at it.<\/p>\n<p>Anyone who&#8217;s seen her campaign has to agree.<\/p>\n<p>Dowd&#8217;s suggestion that Gillibrand is somehow dangerously or inappropriately ambitious is &#8212; not to put to fine a point on it &#8212; luridly sexist.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve watched Gillibrand from the day she declared for Congress.  She is hugely aggressive, to be sure.  Hugely sharp-elbowed.<\/p>\n<p>But never once has she given any evidence that her competence and intelligence and commitment to public service aren&#8217;t the full equal of her ambition.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s not to say that Kirsten Gillibrand is the best person for the job.  <\/p>\n<p>If someone else can make the case in 2010 that they have better ideas, better policies and a greater capacity for leadership, then Gillibrand will lose.  <\/p>\n<p>Until then, I expect Senator Gillibrand to be a formidable and productive member of New York&#8217;s delegation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>No one in America goes postal on women politicians like Maureen Dowd. Hillary Clinton, Sarah [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/448"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=448"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/448\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=448"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=448"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=448"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}