{"id":5755,"date":"2012-03-31T06:52:34","date_gmt":"2012-03-31T10:52:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/?p=5755"},"modified":"2012-03-31T06:52:34","modified_gmt":"2012-03-31T10:52:34","slug":"cross-border-shopping-boom-ahead","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/2012\/03\/31\/cross-border-shopping-boom-ahead\/","title":{"rendered":"Cross-border shopping boom ahead?"},"content":{"rendered":"

If Canada’s just-proposed federal budget passes as submitted, U.S. merchants could be big winners, and Canadian merchants could be in for real pain ahead.<\/p>\n

\"\"

International Bridge at Cornwall.<\/p><\/div>\n

Why? Well, most Canadians live withing driving distance of the border. And Canadians love<\/em> to shop abroad. A fair number of Canadians plan targeted shopping junkets, or make sure they pick up a few extra things on ordinary vacations or business trips abroad.<\/p>\n

Since Canada’s population is one tenth that of the U.S., it stands to reason that selection and prices are often better in the states. But after a run of virtual parity between the two country’s currencies, Canadians are frustrated that they always seem to be paying more, no matter how strong the loonie is.<\/p>\n

The old\/current travel benchmarks can be found here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

As reported in the Vancouver Sun<\/a>, the new rules would go like this:<\/p>\n

Starting June 1, returning travelers who have been outside of Canada for more than 24 hours but less than 48 will be able to bring back $200 worth of tax-exempt goods. That’s up from $50. For those out of Canada for 48 hours or more, the exemption is also increasing from $400 to $800.<\/p>\n

The exemption for more than seven days only rises by $50 to $800. Limits for alcohol and tobacco remain unchanged.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Or course, it’s hard to go on a quick shopping run and stay out of the country for more than 24 hours. So the changes won’t tempt everyone. But many would act to take advantage of possible savings. The\u00a0 Globe and Mail <\/a>writes about who wins and who loses in this scenario:<\/p>\n

“It\u2019s going to have an impact,\u201d said David Russell, co-owner of sporting goods and fashion chain Sporting Life. \u201cPeople will spend more in the U.S. … That will take some money out of the hands of Canadian retailers.\u201d<\/p>\n

He said his hands are tied because he \u2013 and other Canadian retailers \u2013 are forced to pay up to 18 per cent higher import taxes on goods shipped to Canada from China and other overseas manufacturing centres compared with U.S. retailers.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe government is tying my hands behind my back \u2013 I\u2019m paying higher duties,\u201d said Mr. Russell, who is also chairman of the retail council. \u201cThey\u2019ve rendered me less competitive.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Diane Brisebois, president of the Retail Council of Canada, echos that concern:<\/p>\n

As well, retailers are charged up to 30 per cent more by U.S.-based global suppliers, such as Nike and Reebok, for the same products that they ship to their American counterparts, Ms. Brisebois said.<\/p>\n

\u201cConsumers have to understand that retailers are not gouging them,\u201d she said. \u201cThere is not a level playing field.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is no stranger to the emotions that surround this issue for consumers. As the Globe reports:<\/p>\n

Mr. Flaherty has challenged businesses to explain their higher prices and asked the Senate national finance committee to study the price gap. \u201cCanadians are rightly irritated when they see large price discrepancies on the exact same products being sold on different sides of the border,\u201d Mr. Flaherty wrote to the committee in September. \u201cI share their irritation.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

So, what’s your take? Is the playing field level? Seriously out of whack?<\/p>\n

If you’re Canadian, do you believe in supporting local merchants? Or are you tired of constantly paying more?<\/p>\n

If you’re a merchant on the U.S. side, will this change bring you more Canadian shoppers?<\/p>\n

Lastly, if you’re a U.S. traveler, have higher prices and the stronger Canadian dollar reduced your trips to Canada?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

If Canada’s just-proposed federal budget passes as submitted, U.S. merchants could be big winners, and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[5627,880,6704,10],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5755"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5755"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5755\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5755"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5755"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5755"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}