{"id":6546,"date":"2012-09-11T11:38:42","date_gmt":"2012-09-11T15:38:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/?p=6546"},"modified":"2012-09-11T11:40:29","modified_gmt":"2012-09-11T15:40:29","slug":"men-and-the-matrix","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/2012\/09\/11\/men-and-the-matrix\/","title":{"rendered":"Men and the Matrix"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/2012\/09\/11\/men-and-the-matrix\/trinity-neo\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-6547\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-6547\" title=\"trinity-neo\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/files\/2012\/09\/trinity-neo-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/files\/2012\/09\/trinity-neo-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/files\/2012\/09\/trinity-neo-150x100.jpg 150w, https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/files\/2012\/09\/trinity-neo.jpg 392w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/\">The latest issue of the New Yorker<\/a> has a rich, complex interview with the Wachowski siblings, science fiction storytellers who created the Matrix franchise.<\/p>\n<p>If you don&#8217;t know it, the Matrix series imagines a world where the reality around us is virtual, fluid, imaginary.<\/p>\n<p>They have a new film, &#8220;Cloud Atlas,&#8221; that traces the paths of a network of human souls that migrate through different bodies, points of history, stories.<\/p>\n<p>One additional texture here is that Larry Wachowski has re-emerged publicly as Lana Wachowski.\u00a0 She has undergone that suitably science-fictiony process known as &#8220;trans-gendering.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That cluster of data points merged weirdly in my head this week as I was reading a series of high profile articles about the cultural and economic struggles of men in our society.\u00a0 In his review of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/articles\/double_x\/doublex\/2012\/09\/breadwinner_wives_when_the_women_make_more_money_who_holds_the_power_.html\">Hanna Rosin&#8217;s new book, &#8220;The Failure of Men<\/a>,&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2012\/09\/11\/opinion\/brooks-why-men-fail.html?smid=fb-share\">David Brooks writes this<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>It [the uncertain position of men in modern society] has to do with adaptability. Women, Rosin argues, are like immigrants who have moved to a new country. They see a new social context, and they flexibly adapt to new circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>Men are like immigrants who have physically moved to a new country but who have kept their minds in the old one. They speak the old language. They follow the old mores. Men are more likely to be rigid; women are more fluid.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This is, on one level, pop psychology.\u00a0 But I think there&#8217;s a lot of truth here as well.\u00a0 We live in a frenetic, evolving, complex culture, one where all concepts &#8212; but particularly masculinity, femininity, sexuality and gender roles &#8212; are being re-negotiated in real time.<\/p>\n<p><object width=\"286\" height=\"212\" classid=\"clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000\" codebase=\"http:\/\/download.macromedia.com\/pub\/shockwave\/cabs\/flash\/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\"><param name=\"src\" value=\"http:\/\/c.brightcove.com\/services\/viewer\/federated_f8\/271557391\" \/><param name=\"flashvars\" value=\"videoId=1813810918001&amp;playerId=271557391&amp;viewerSecureGatewayURL=https:\/\/console.brightcove.com\/services\/amfgateway&amp;servicesURL=http:\/\/services.brightcove.com\/services&amp;cdnURL=http:\/\/admin.brightcove.com&amp;domain=embed&amp;autoStart=false&amp;\" \/><param name=\"base\" value=\"http:\/\/admin.brightcove.com\" \/><param name=\"seamlesstabbing\" value=\"false\" \/><param name=\"swliveconnect\" value=\"true\" \/><param name=\"pluginspage\" value=\"http:\/\/www.macromedia.com\/shockwave\/download\/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash\" \/><embed width=\"286\" height=\"212\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" src=\"http:\/\/c.brightcove.com\/services\/viewer\/federated_f8\/271557391\" flashvars=\"videoId=1813810918001&amp;playerId=271557391&amp;viewerSecureGatewayURL=https:\/\/console.brightcove.com\/services\/amfgateway&amp;servicesURL=http:\/\/services.brightcove.com\/services&amp;cdnURL=http:\/\/admin.brightcove.com&amp;domain=embed&amp;autoStart=false&amp;\" base=\"http:\/\/admin.brightcove.com\" seamlesstabbing=\"false\" swliveconnect=\"true\" pluginspage=\"http:\/\/www.macromedia.com\/shockwave\/download\/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\" \/><\/object><\/p>\n<p>It is, in other words, a matrix.\u00a0 It&#8217;s a shifting and complicated pattern.\u00a0 This is incredibly challenging stuff and for some men in particular, it&#8217;s absolutely terrifying.<\/p>\n<p>While thinking about this stuff, I came across <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2012\/09\/11\/pat-robertson-become-muslim-to-beat-your-wife_n_1873142.html\">this conversation on the Christian Bible Network<\/a>, where evangelist Pat Robertson is trying to offer advice to a man whose wife clearly doesn&#8217;t love him anymore.<\/p>\n<p>The guy is on the front lines of this cultural moment, begging for advice and guidance.<\/p>\n<p>Robertson laments the fact that physical violence is no longer an option to resolve their domestic crisis.\u00a0 &#8220;I don\u2019t think we condone wife-beating these days,&#8221; he says, &#8220;but something has got to be done to make her [more obedient and respectful].&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He goes on to describe the wife as &#8220;a rebellious child&#8221; who won&#8217;t &#8220;submit to authority.&#8221;\u00a0 (Watching his female co-host field these comments is worth a click-through.)<\/p>\n<p>I know that sounds Medieval &#8212; on one level, it&#8217;s sort of a conversation-ender.\u00a0 But I think it&#8217;s also an important reminder of just how profound this shift is.<\/p>\n<p>Having a black man in the White House is revolutionary.\u00a0 Having women out-earn and (in many situations) out-confidence their husbands, that&#8217;s intimate and for many people viscerally gut-wrenching.<\/p>\n<p>One of my favorite writers, Iain M. Banks, has penned a series of science fiction novels &#8212; The Culture sequence &#8212; where he envisions a future where we have moved past all this, where identity is in a constant and comfortable state of &#8220;trans&#8221; that is no longer defined by gender or race.<\/p>\n<p>His exploration of what that might feel like is riveting, one of those rare &#8220;speculative&#8221; fiction experiments that really might be giving us a sense of what our future will look like. But we&#8217;re not there yet.<\/p>\n<p>Still, I think Rosin and Brooks and Wachowski and Banks are all right about one thing:\u00a0 It&#8217;s an adaptation moment for men.<\/p>\n<p>Not &#8220;let&#8217;s behave better because it&#8217;s the right thing and enlightened men will do it&#8221; &#8212; that was the inflection point of the 1970s.\u00a0 This is more of a &#8220;we have to change or get left behind&#8221; situation.<\/p>\n<p>Does that mean matriarchy, as Rosin suggests.\u00a0 I don&#8217;t think so.\u00a0 In fact, the idea that there is a clean, zero-sum-gain continuum between partiarchy and matriarchy is, well, weirdly masuciline.<\/p>\n<p>Instead it means men being more fluid, more flexible, and learning to accept that every day will bring situations and relationships that can&#8217;t be controlled &#8212; or, to borrow Robertson&#8217;s phrase, can&#8217;t be disciplined.<\/p>\n<p>But maybe, in the end, it&#8217;s Neo who says it best.\u00a0 &#8220;I know that you&#8217;re afraid,&#8221; he says.\u00a0 &#8220;You&#8217;re afraid of change. I don&#8217;t know the future. I didn&#8217;t come here to tell you how this is going to end. I came here to tell you how it&#8217;s going to begin.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>What Neo promises is, fundamentally, a world of constant uncertainty, negotiation and (yes) opportunity, a &#8220;world without rules and controls, without borders or boundaries. A world where anything is possible. Where we go from there is a choice I leave to you.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The latest issue of the New Yorker has a rich, complex interview with the Wachowski [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6546"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6546"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6546\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.northcountrypublicradio.org\/inbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}