What our first President said to America’s oldest synagogue

Now that President Obama has stepped into the debate over building an Islamic cultural center and mosque near the site of the World Trade Center, it’s worth remembering what President George Washington said to the Jews of Newport, Rhode Island.

They weren’t the first congregation of Jews in the colonies, but – after the long war for independence – the members were prospering and the group was growing. And they wanted to know if the United States’ new Constitutional government would recognize and defend the same rights for Jews that, at the time, were afforded to Christians.

In 1790 – President Washington’s first full year in office – the head of Newport’s Hebrew Congregation (as they called themselves) used the flowery, diplomatic language of the time to ask for tolerance. Here’s an excerpt:

Deprived as we heretofore have been of the invaluable rights of free Citizens, we now with a deep sense of gratitude to the Almighty disposer of all events behold a Government, erected by the Majesty of the People — a Government, which to bigotry gives no sanction, to persecution no assistance — but generously affording to all Liberty of conscience, and immunities of Citizenship: — deeming every one, of whatever Nation, tongue, or language equal parts of the great governmental Machine.

Washington’s reply:

The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for having given to mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal policy: a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship. It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people, that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent national gifts. For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support.

Are bigotry and persecution motivating opposition to the Cordoba Islamic center in Manhattan? Perhaps. It’s clear they’re playing a big role in the fights against other proposed mosques across the U.S.

There appears to be wide-spread agreement that the site of the September 11th attacks in New York City is hallowed ground. President Obama said exactly that in his comments yesterday at a ceremonial feast, breaking the day of fasting that’s part of Islam’s holy month of Ramadan.

But the Muslim congregation in Manhattan doesn’t want to build a cultural center or mosque on Ground Zero. They want to build it two blocks away, at the site of a former Burlington Coat Factory.

President Obama said yesterday, “The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country, and will not be treated differently by their government, is essential to who we are.”

In 1790, President Washington essentially repeated the words of Moses Seixas to say, “the Government of the United States… gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance….” But Washington himself wrote this:

It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people, that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent national gifts.

It is coincidence that the correspondence between the Hebrew Congregation of Newport and President Washington began August 17, 1790 – 220 years ago. It’s far more interesting that both letters are hanging on the wall of Newport’s Touro Synagogue, the oldest in the United States.

As America argues over building the Cordoba center, we should consider what remnants of this debate will still be in its archives 220 years from now – and what Americans then will say about us.

62 Comments on “What our first President said to America’s oldest synagogue”

Leave a Comment
  1. hermit thrush says:

    jdm,

    do you have any idea what you’re talking about or are you just throwing around wild allegations? of course jonathan already asked you this in a less pointed way, and you completely punted. if you have links, show em.

    bret,

    i’m all for “demanding” that other countries emulate our standards for religious freedom. how do you plan to go about it?

  2. oa says:

    “The point is why are “we”, the USA, required to be sensitive to offending Moslem sensibilities but “they” don’t share that requirement?”

    Uh, because “they” (the people in question here) are US citizens and are therefore “we.”
    Weird, but it’s still possible in this country to be a Muslim AND and an American.
    And for what it’s worth, the guy behind the Cordoba center actually HAS called out radicals in his faith:
    http://www.newsweek.com/2010/08/06/the-real-ground-zero.html
    “On Islam, his main subject, Rauf’s views are clear: he routinely denounces all terrorism—as he did again last week, publicly. He speaks of the need for Muslims to live peacefully with all other religions. He emphasizes the commonalities among all faiths. He advocates equal rights for women, and argues against laws that in any way punish non-Muslims. His last book, What’s Right With Islam Is What’s Right With America, argues that the United States is actually the ideal Islamic society because it encourages diversity and promotes freedom for individuals and for all religions. His vision of Islam is bin Laden’s nightmare.”

  3. knuckleheadedliberal says:

    I thought we were supposed to be the good guys, the grown ups.

    I always thought we were supposed to be the country that held the lamp of freedom and justice high for all to see.

    I am ashamed of this whole discussion, that it is even happening is a disgrace.

  4. oa says:

    Yeah, knuck, but at least this discussion and the anchor babies “debate” are taking media attention away from trivial issues like the jobs crisis, climate change and cleaning up the gulf. Oh, wait.

  5. mervel says:

    I don’t buy the sacred ground argument either, its not sacred.

    America is about “the hustle” as Dennis Miller says ( I can’t believe I am quoting Dennis Miller), but anyway we should be getting on with it; building the trade centers replacement making that better than what was there before; if we had got off our ass and re-built a huge sky scraper and it was done by know or at least well underway, no one would care about a Mosque a couple of blocks away. That is what I thought the stimulus was going to be about that kind of huge building infrastructure projects. But instead we do seem to be stuck.

  6. Bret4207 says:

    OA, I don’t buy it. We, as a Nation, throw ourselves on the sword at the slightest hint we may not be absolutely perfect. Now, personally, I don’t care where they build a Mosque. The problem is the symbolism of the Towers and Ground Zero and a Mosque/Islamic Center/whatever. The problem is what does it mean to the radical Moslems? Does it mean we’re open and freedom loving or does it mean we’re a bunch of idiots without the backbone or vision to see what they see and say, “Hey, there’s a problem here…”.

    That’s the question and I don’t know the answer. I do know Islam is not a “religion of peace”, not to many that practice it. Sad that those who are peaceful are vastly outnumbered by those that aren’t.

  7. hermit thrush says:

    according to wikipedia, there are about 1.57 billion muslims in the world. bret, are you honestly saying that the vast majority of them are not peaceful?

  8. Bret4207 says:

    I would say that the vast majority of Muslims have sympathies that lay with the more radical elements of the religion. That doesn’t mean that I think the vast majority of Muslims are violent per se, but judging by what I see on Al Jazzera and some of the international news reports I see on the web the overwhelming feeling displayed by Muslims leans toward the “sword” end of things. Now, if I’m entirely wrong and the vast majority craves peace among all else, then they really need to get their butts in gear and start making some noise, ‘cuz that ain’t what I’m seeing in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the Philipines, Syria, etc.

    If you can prove all 1.57 Billion are peaceful that’s great, please do.

  9. oa says:

    Well, they haven’t invaded any western countries lately. Unlike us.

  10. lynn says:

    It was EVIL men that got on those flights that day that changed all our lives forever. Not a Religion, not another Country… just very EVIL men sent by a very EVIL man to do his dirty work.
    Don’t blame a religion for what EVIL people do….. We all know it wasn’t in GOD’s name this was done… It was all done in a EVIL man’s mind.

  11. brainyblonde says:

    For the record:

    Saudis already have over $400 BILLION invested in US companies, universitites, libraries and charities with some reports siting up to $800B as of 2008.

    In 2005 Prince Alwaleed bin Talal gave $20 Million to both Georgetown and Harvard. George H W and George W Bush each accepted Saudi donations for their Presidential Libraries as did Clinton.

    It is also a known fact that the Bush family has been business partners with Saudi Royality for decades and the Saudis have been allowed to invest in our defense contractors.

    GE sold its plastics division to Saudi and the Saudi Government now has plans to try and buy US farm land in response to their own impeding food storages due to lack of water.

    While President, G W Bush held 8 Iftar dinners and was photographed holding hands with and kissing Arab men on the mouth. Do these actions make him a Homosexual Muslim? NO

    Why is it okay for Saudis to invest in and even outright purchase every other aspect of America but not this Community Center?

  12. Tazmo1348 says:

    People, I would like to throw another boomerang into the mix, If you look back in history you will find that most mosques are built on the site of aconcieved victory, either in a war or an overthrow of a local entity.Not many of the mosques in the world were put where they for the idea of it being a place of worship but a place to honor those who chose martydon.I feel that a muslum center or what ever they wish to call it is inapropriate due to this fact in history.

Leave a Reply