Tea Party in, Working Families Party out?

After the November elections, it’s possible the Working Families Party will not have a designated line on ballots across New York State. But the Tea Party could.

There is only one criterion for getting a party on state ballots: the party’s gubernatorial candidate must get at least 50,000 votes in the general election.

The Working Families Party (WFP) was hoping Democrat Andrew Cuomo would accept their nomination and appear in the party’s top slot in November. But the Cuomo campaign is saying, “Not now.”

In a statement released Friday about the WFP, campaign spokesman Phil Singer said, “There are several open issues that need to be considered, including but not limited to an ongoing federal investigation….”

Those last three words are often deal breakers. But this being an election year, there’s plenty of speculation beyond the official statement.

The New York Times quotes an anonymous source who says Cuomo is delaying any association with the WFP to prevent the party from endorsing candidates in the race to replace Cuomo as Attorney General. It’s the kind of “Inside Baseball” political maneuvering that bores all but the wonkiest poll watchers, but you can read all about it here.

There is also speculation that Cuomo is keeping organized labor–a core WFP constituency–at arm’s length. From the Times to our own Albany correspondent Karen DeWitt, there is plenty of reporting (link to the Times story; link to Karen’s story) about Cuomo’s attempt to position himself as an Albany “outsider.” One rationale goes along these lines: Running with minimal support from unions would put Cuomo (if elected) in a stronger position to demand concessions on public employees’ pay and benefits in this age of broken state budgets.

Summing this up: Cuomo is (for now) apparently willing to run without the WFP nomination. If the party can’t find a gubernatorial candidate that gets them 50,000+ votes, November would be the last time–for at least four years–the party would appear as a printed line on state ballots.

(Side note: A bill was anonymously floated last week in the State Senate to change this criterion and allow parties to remain on future ballots if they garner more than 50,000 votes in any statewide race. We’ll just have to see if this makes it through our dysfunctional state legislature and is signed by Gov. Paterson.)

The Tea Party’s chance to get its own printed line on New York ballots rests with Carl Paladino.

The billionaire Buffalo developer says he’ll put $10 million into his campaign for Governor. And he’s already garnered the support of some Tea Party groups across the state.

If Paladino makes good on his pledge, it’s certainly possible (bordering on probable) that he’d get at least 50,000 votes.

Political parties appear and vanish all the time. So, I wonder if this matters to you as a voter. And do you think it’s appropriate that only one criterion determines which parties are printed on New York State ballots? Comment below.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Update: The Working Families Party nominated Ken Schaeffer for Governor and Elon Harpaz for Lt. Gov.

But this big qualifier is part of the WFP release:
“These outstanding individuals have shown a longstanding commitment to working families and they are the best candidates currently available. That said, they are all team players, and should stronger candidates emerge, WFP members may revisit today’s decisions.”

Tags:

7 Comments on “Tea Party in, Working Families Party out?”

Leave a Comment
  1. Unless and until we change to a parliamentary system, voting for a minority party is a throw away vote. Yeah, I know, “It sends a message”. The trouble is the politicians in the winning party only read messages sent by those who supported them not the protest voters. Case in point: Show me where George W. Bush changed or moderated his position on anything because of all the Ralph Nader voters. I’m waiting for an answer but not holding my breath.

  2. mervel says:

    Well I think the Republican Party is changing due to protest votes being cast for Libertarians. This has taken a long time but we see the changes.

    Nader’s target was the Democratic Party, not the Republican Party. So in that sense I think third parties can have some policy impact.

  3. Brian says:

    People who want real change should vote for the Green Party. The Conservatives, the WFP and the “Tea Party” are merely factions of the two corporate parties that have screwed up NYS for decades.

  4. Dan says:

    I find it interesting that several Gulf State pols who were decrying taxes and government interference are now crying for more government intervention and funds to help combat the oil spill.

    Can’t have it both ways. Kinda like buying fire insurance while your house burns.

  5. Bret4207 says:

    Brian, one might say the Green party is nothing but the reincarnation of the Socialist Workers party that doesn’t have such a great record either.

    Dan, I agree in part, but talking about moving to different paradigm when you’re hip deep in another….well, you have to deal with the realities of the moment. Some of the things those pols asked for- permits for berms, dikes, sea walls, etc- should ave been fast tracked. Instead they were ignored and reluctantly issued for only a percentage of the number requested. Things like that are a pretty good argument against our current system.

  6. Ashley says:

    James,

    That is normally the case with third parties, however, in NY state we have fusion voting. Fusion allows candidates to be endorsed on multiple lines- so voters can “send a message” while still voting for a viable candidate. It also allows smaller parties, like the WFP, to actually make a difference, especially in smaller elections.

  7. JohnR says:

    The Green Party is the only one with a real program, and real solutions for ordinary working people. Unlike many Old Left parties, there is ideological diversity within the Greens; members agree only on the Four Pllars of Grassroots Democracy, Social and Economic Justice, Ecological Wisdom, and Peace and Non-Violence. And dozens of local legislators and officials have been elected on the Green Party line in recent years. Don’t believe the hype! What makes a candidate viable happens when enough people believe the candidate is viable–and not necessarily listening to the viewpoint of the mainstream media.

Leave a Reply