Me and the Greens (Party, that is)

Petra Kelly, co-found of the German Green Party (Wikipedia)

There’s been a lot of talk lately on the In Box and in the North Country news-o-sphere about the Green Party, Don Hassig’s wobbly run for congress, and the media’s coverage of third parties in general.

One personal wrinkle in this whole story is that I was sort of there at the early going of the international Green Party movement, albeit in a totally inconsequential, feckless bystanderish sort of way.

In 1983, I went to what was then West Germany.  I was a high school kid from a tiny Alaskan town, eager to learn about the big, wide world.

As a foreign exchange student, I was entirely politically naive, far more interested in girls and beer than ideas or the fate of nations.

But I found myself in a crucible of ferocious argument, over the Cold War, the environment, the role of America in the world, and capitalism.

This being Germany, the debates were powered by philosophy and theory, rather than talking points and sound bites.

(Okay, it wasn’t all deep rhetoric.  That was also the year that Nena’s pop song “99 Luftballoons” came out, an anti-war dance tune that was sort of the anthem of the moment.)

It was fascinating, heady stuff, and perhaps the most compelling voice was that of Petra Kelly, one of the co-founders of Die Grunen, or the German Green Party.

Kelly was elected to Germany’s parliament in 1983 and to the young people I was hanging out with, she was a pivotal figure, sort of the Bobby Kennedy of her time and place.

In those days, the (literally) life-or-death issue was nuclear war.  In the early 80s, living within a few miles of the East German border, Ronald Reagan’s get-tough policy with the Soviet Union felt like a terrifying act of brinksmanship.

I remember lying in my attic bedroom listening to helicopter gunships fly in waves overhead.  The possibility that things might go horribly, fatally wrong seemed very real.

When measured against the vast military build-up that we were seeing, The Greens’ ideas about disarmament and peaceful co-existence held enormous appeal.

And though she had a troubled personal life, Kelly herself seemed profoundly sane, humane and grounded.  She was a rare, vividly human figure in that country’s mostly gray, stodgy political world.  But she wasn’t only a celebrity.  She worked steadily to help build her party, sticking with it from the late 70s until the early 90s.

In later years, I actually met Kelly very briefly at some kind of academic conference where she spoke.

Sadly, Petra Kelly died in 1992, apparently killed in a murder-suicide carried out by her longtime companion Gert Bastian, a former German general who was also a founder of the Greens.  (This account is disputed by some who are convinced that the pair were murdered, but the evidence for that is thin.)

Unlike the Green Party in the US — which has been plagued by inconsistent organizing, a lack of leadership, and a national political system that limits the effectiveness of third parties — Kelly’s movement has continued to see significant success in Germany.

They’ve played an active role in coalition governments in Germany and in state parliaments.

They’ve also held significant power in running big city governments, including Hamburg,  Freiburg, Tubingen and Konstance, according to a 2010 report in Der Spiegel magazine.

Last year, the Greens elected their first governor in the state of Baden-Württemberg.  If you’d told me in 1983 that Greens would actually be governing, I would never have believed it.

As a footnote, I’ve often wondered in the years since about Petra Kelly’s positions on the issues that her country and the world faced in those far-off days.  What would have happened if the U.S. hadn’t applied such enormous military pressure to the Soviet Union?

Would Europe still be divided, with much of the continent still under dictatorship?  Would Germany still be cut in half by a razor wire?  Perhaps the Cold War would still be simmering along?

On the other hand, was it morally acceptable for President Reagan to challenge an increasingly unstable Soviet Union, with an entire world’s future on the line?  Even now, in hindsight, it seems a terrible gamble, with astonishingly high stakes.

Impossible to say.  What’s certain is that Kelly and her allies added an important, sane and compassionate voice to conversation in times that were, arguably, far more troubled and dangerous than our own.

 

 

 

Tags:

14 Comments on “Me and the Greens (Party, that is)”

Leave a Comment
  1. Larry says:

    “On the other hand, was it morally acceptable for President Reagan to challenge an increasingly unstable Soviet Union, with an entire world’s future on the line? Even now, in hindsight, it seems a terrible gamble, with astonishingly high stakes.”

    Morally acceptable? I think there was a moral imperative for him to challenge them and thank God he did. History is replete with stories of the consequences paid for not challenging godless, corrupt, murdering regimes. The stakes are always high but they are highest when people don’t act.

  2. knuckleheadedliberal says:

    Larry, lighten up a little. We get it already, you’re a super-patriot and you really, really like Reagan.

  3. wj says:

    Yeah, and what’s wrong with being godless? I mean, I wouldn’t advocate it for anybody else, but it’s worked well for me.

  4. mervel says:

    Sounds like an elitist bitch to me.

  5. Well, the Greens success in Germany is less surprising. It is better organized, as you point out. And it operates in a system where the media does its job and where electoral law encourages smaller party participation (if you get 5% of the vote, you automatically get representation in the lower house of the legislature) rather than being rigged against it. Imagine if America, where about 35% of the voters are neither Democrat nor Republican, had such a system.

    But the German Greens’ rise illustrates the important role that smaller parties can play in shaping the national debate. One only has to compare Germany’s enlightened and progressive energy policy to America’s ostrich approach to see the Greens’ influence.

  6. Larry says:

    KHL,
    Your hostility is annoying, but not surprising. I certainly don’t need advice on my mood from you.

  7. Dave says:

    I’m struggling to understand the ‘godless’ part of Larry’s equation too… especially since most of the corrupt, murdering regimes we are threatened by now are theocracies.

    These are murdering regimes that don’t just happen to believe in god, but indeed use that belief in god as the justification for their actions.

  8. Mervel says:

    Hey now North Korea is not a theocracy!

    But what nation states are we threatened by today? Realistically? Come on we could wipe these guys off the face of the earth using only our navy. I mean we defeated Saddam Hussain’s military the largest at the time, in three weeks using only conventional forces.

    The only true military threat we face is China. The rest is kind of a scam drummed up by the fear mongers to get us to spend trillions upon trillions on defense to fight guys with rudimentary cell phone bombs and box cutters. We are defeating them with drones which in the grand scheme are cheap.

    So once again the true realistic threats we face are from Godless, commie pagans.

  9. Walker says:

    No, North Korea is not a theocracy, though it’s near deification of Kim Il Jong came close. But the North Korean constitution states that freedom of religion is permitted, so it’s not quite the godless communism you’re used to. It’s no picnic being Christian there.

  10. mervel says:

    Well it can’t be as bad as the persecution I face in this country from you secularists every day.

  11. Walker says:

    I assume you’re joking.

    “According to a ranking published by Open Doors, an organization that supports persecuted Christians, North Korea is currently the country with the most severe persecution of Christians in the world. Open Doors estimates that 50,000–70,000 Christians are detained in North Korean prison camps. (Wikipedia)

  12. mervel says:

    Speaking of Godless, there was a fascinating piece on NPR I think yesterday about religious identification etc within a country. I think the meme for a long time has been that the US is a very religious country, polls show that we believe in God more and go to church much more than other western developed nations, particularly Europe. Well come to find out, maybe not. Just given polling data that asks do you go to church every week, the data have shown that around 47% say yes they go every week. However, this does not square with what I see in Church nor does it square with what pastors/priests are seeing. If 47% of the adult US population went to church every Sunday or Saturday, Churches should be PACKED every week, that is a lot of people. But this is not the case. So the used another statistical method that analyzed where people were at particular times during the previous week, in those survey’s we get around 20-24% attending Church, which is what we have in Europe as a whole, with many European countries exceeding that (Poland, Ireland etc.). So what is up? The answer was that we feel we should say we go to church, just like we say we should floss every day, so on polls we say that we floss everyday, yet very few people actually floss.

    The bottom line is that we just talk about faith, religion, Christianity, but don’t really follow through at a most basic level of devotion, this totally makes sense to me.

  13. mervel says:

    Sorry way off topic. I think when we realistically faced the specter of world destruction from a nuclear exchange with the Soviet Union, the thinking was different across the spectrum. The Green’s had some interesting points.

  14. knuckleheadedliberal says:

    Did you say 47%? Hmmm, where have I heard that number before….

Leave a Reply