Thoughts on Doug Hoffman’s journey

F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote once that there are no second acts in American lives.

Whatever else you think about Doug Hoffman, the accountant from Lake Placid, you have to credit him for proving Fitzgerald wrong.

Hoffman showed that it’s possible to think big at any stage in life.

I first met Hoffman last year, on an autumn day in Plattsburgh.  I found him and an aide carrying sign boards up a sidewalk to the spot where they planned to hold a press conference.

It seemed a little bizarre at the time, clumsy and poorly orchestrated.  There were no crowds, no supporters, just the two of them standing in a little park.

In a sometimes halting speech that came to be his trademark — a sign that he is an everyman and not a career politician — Hoffman laid out his case for beating Republican Dede Scozzafava and taking on Democrat Bill Owens.

He argued that he could beat them both at the same time.

He accomplished half of that feat last November, ousting Scozzafava and building a political insurgency that propelled him, at least briefly, into the national spotlight.

Hoffman became a darling of Fox News and AM talk radio.  He appeared on Glenn Beck’s program, where he proudly proclaimed himself a member of Beck’s “9/12” club.

On election night 2009, Fox even set up a special studio in Saranac Lake, to televise what was expected to be the coronation of the nation’s first tea-party rebel.

It wasn’t to be.

Hoffman fell short, and his conservative rebellion cleared the way for Bill Owens’ election — adding another vote to the Democratic Party’s push for health care reform, stimulus spending, and Wall Street regulation.

That night, I watched Hoffman concede the race, though he would later tinker with the idea that perhaps the election had been stolen.  (He was never able to offer any evidence to support the suggestion.)

It was a painful moment, with Conservative Party chairman Mike Long dominating the podium.

What to make of Hoffman’s story?  Was he a puppet, a pawn and a spoiler?

Was he the symptom of a brewing tea party zeitgeist?  The thwarted leader of a serious grassroots movement?

In a way, this year’s primary race will help answer those questions, but it has also raised new questions.

In running again, Hoffman once more managed to infuriate and alienate dozens of local Republican party leaders in the 23rd district.

Rather than rallying to his cause, they wound up calling him names — the harshest, perhaps, being “loser.”

They argued that he was too detached from local concerns, too preoccupied with ideological conservatism.

The blasted Hoffman for running a poorly coordinated, underfunded campaign, and urged him to drop out of the race in favor of  their favored candidate, Matt Doheny.

Hoffman refused and instead promised to campaign through November 2010 on the Conservative line, even if he loses the GOP primary.

Once again, his decisions — and his inability to reach out to Republican leaders — sparked more questions:  Was it hubris?  Vanity?  Political courage and independence?

And so the journey continues.  Today voters are deciding where the road will take Doug Hoffman next.

Back home to Lake Placid and political obscurity?  To a lonely third-party slog through the autumn?

Or perhaps to a confrontation with Owens as the Republican-Conservative standard-bearer.  And maybe even on to eventual triumph in Washington DC.

Whatever the outcome of today’s primary, Hoffman has already established himself as one of the most fascinating, enigmatic figures in the North Country’s political history

Tags:

4 Comments on “Thoughts on Doug Hoffman’s journey”

Leave a Comment
  1. JDM says:

    “Once again, his decisions — and his inability to reach out to Republican leaders — sparked more questions: Was it hubris? Vanity? Political courage and independence?”

    Or was it a grass-roots movement that really doesn’t involve the person of Doug Hoffman at all? I mean, come on, he certainly isn’t mister personality.

    Anyone who was willing to stand up and fill the void would have made the same story. Thank you, Doug Hoffman, for standing up!

    And the story of the special election wasn’t Doug Hoffman, the spoiler. It was a grass-root message to the GOP establishment. Quit picking LIBERALS for the GOP party. Let the Dems pick them. We want conservative candidates.

    Matt Doheny was a better pick than Dede, but his lack of conviction on his own views left him vulnerable to a person-of-conviction. And, come on, Matt. Either it’s a baby from conception or it isn’t. Quit trying to sound so political and split hairs as to when life begins after about three months!

    That is so….. political sounding, it’s insulting.

  2. DBW says:

    Something that has kept coming through over the past year of Doug Hoffman’s journey is that many people seem to want the NYS Republican Party to be something it isn’t–“conservative”. It is and has been for many decades a moderate party, that has included over the years, the likes of Jacob Javits, John Lindsay, Nelson Rockefeller, and Miller–Goldwater’s VP candidate. If folks want to try and elect ‘conservatives” join the Conservative Party.

  3. JDM says:

    Certainly, the direction was going more and more moderate.

    But, the conservatives were there, all along.

    If a break-off group is needed, it is the moderate edge. Let them become the moderate party. There should be enough centrist Dems and Reps to form a formidable party.

    As for the Republican party, I think it needs to swing back to the right.

  4. oa says:

    Brian,
    Just fyi, you’re probably making a common mistake on that Fitzgerald quote. Of course Fitzgerald knew people had second chances in America.
    Most scholars say he was probably referring to the classic three-act dramatic structure of plays, wherein, after introducing characters, setting and a problem in Act I, playwrights:

    “… take the problem posed in the Act I and make it more complicated. Every time the protagonist tries to solve the problem, the forces of antagonism react to make the situation even worse. The end of Act II is usually a terrible mess that Act III brings to a climax and resolves.
    What Scott Fitzgerald was probably saying is that we Americans don’t like obstacles and complications. We like cutting to the chase. If things aren’t working out our way, our great sense of New World mobility simply allows us to move on. Europeans don’t have infinite frontiers in their psyche, so they are stuck with problem-solving and pessimism. American lives are not about second acts. They are about expedient resolutions — just take out your gun and shoot the guy!”

    So Hoffman and the Tea Partiers in many ways exemplify an American longing for simple solutions, a longing that is in fact the epitome of what Fitzgerald was talking about.
    Source of the above quote is: http://www.madinpursuit.com/Journal/20040927.htm

Leave a Reply