Will these scandals cripple Obama? Probably not.

obamainoval_375

President Barack Obama during a meeting in the Oval Office. Official White House Photo by Pete Souza

Let me say again that I think the trifecta of scandals hovering around the White House warrant serious investigation and a credible probe of the facts.  And it remains unclear where that path will lead.

But as the summer fug settles over Washington DC, I think it’s increasingly clear that — barring new revelations — the political fall-out from the mess will be far less damaging than Republicans and conservatives hope.  Here are six reasons why.

1.  So far, it’s just not playing outside the I Hate Obama community.  Yes, these accusations are serious.  But most Americans don’t seem to be buying the conservative narrative that the jury is in and guilt has already been fixed.  Remember that we’ve been down this road before.  In the 1990s, Republicans thought they had a convincing scandal narrative that would permanently alienate voters from Bill Clinton.  From Whitewater to Lewinsky, they painted a portrait that, in the Rush-Limbaugh-sphere was utterly damning.  Americans didn’t buy it and Clinton had a successful second term.

2.  The Republican narrative is muddled.  There are two completely contradictory stories being told.  The first is that Mr. Obama is a quota candidate, a lazy guy elected for his blackness who has no real qualifications.  He is a bungler, who plays too much golf.   The second narrative is that he is a kind of Machiavellian “Chicago” style manipulator, a tyrannical figure who is using the engines of power to strip Americans of their freedom.  I sometimes hear conservatives make both claims in a single paragraph.  One charge might stick.  Both won’t.

3.  Republicans are letting the crazy show.  Remember back in 2012 when Mitt Romney was being creamed by that horrible video tape that showed him talking down the “47 percent”?  Barack Obama’s team went silent.  They let the story play out, knowing that when the torpedoes are in the water the best thing to do is stay out of the way and hope for a big explosion.  The GOP doesn’t have that kind of discipline.  There’s wild talk of impeachment.  On Fox News people are being compared to Adolph Hitler and Richard Nixon.  Local conservative activist Bob Schulz, from Queensbury, described the IRS as “the largest, most feared terrorist organization in the Western Hemisphere,” in an interview with the Glens Falls Post Star.  That kind of stuff makes average Americans think this is just more culture war noise.

4.  Liberals got no place to go.  One reason these last couple of weeks have looked so bad for the White House — and this gets overlooked in a lot of the analysis — is that liberals are furious, too.  The MSNBC and Huffingtonpost chattering class has been frustrated with Obama for years and these scandals, especially the Justice Department’s AP probe, have opened the floodgates.  Which means that people who would normally be defending the president are slapping him around.  But barring ugly new disclosures, that won’t last.

5.  Obama is a tenth-round fighter.  People forget this over and over.  And over.  I hear from my liberal and my conservative friends the same idea, that this president flops or he concedes too early or he won’t get angry or he doesn’t know how to throw a punch.  Yes, this White House is cautious.  Clearly.  But it also has a record of beating down opponents slowly and steadily.  Ask Hillary Clinton or John McCain or Mitt Romney or the opponents of Obamacare or people who didn’t want gays in the military or the people who thought the Solyndra or the Fast and Furious accusations would stick.

6.  The economy is doing pretty well.  This is the biggy.  This is the firewall.  Republicans worked feverishly over the last half decade to convince Americans that this president couldn’t fix the economy and that he would bankrupt us along the way.  America is the next Greece!  But unemployment is down and the stock market is up, and that’s a big contrast with the situation in European countries that embraced austerity.  Meanwhile, the Federal budget deficit is plummeting — shrinking from 10% of GDP at the height of the recession to roughly 2% of GDP by 2015, according to a new Congressional study.  If those numbers keep up, it will be hard for the Republicans to get people excited about Benghazi or about the idea that Obama is a failed president.

So with Obama’s approval rating holding steady at 49%, here’s my prediction.

By mid-summer, barring another big shoe dropping, this round of scandal will be added to the massive pile of resentments that have built up among conservatives.

The right will see this as another “smoking gun” moment that the rest of America — all the “low information” voters — failed to grasp.

But as their 401ks and their home values and their job prospects perk upwards, the rest of the country will have moved on to barbecues and holidays and summer blockbuster movies.

Scientific excitement over “old” Ontario water

300m below ground in a Timmins, Ontario mine. Photo: eskimo-jo, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

300m below ground in a Timmins, Ontario mine. Photo: eskimo-jo, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Samples of old water from a mine in northern Ontario, generated news reports around the world this past week.

Deep Canadian mine yields ancient water” says the BBC. “2.7-billion-year-old water may hold clues to life on Earth and Mars” says Zee news from India.

The age thing is apparently hard to nail down. Estimates range from 1 billion to the rounded-up higher number cited by the India report. The India headline also summarizes why scientists are excited.

Earth science is not my thing. Indeed, my response to some of the excitement is befuddlement: there’s a big difference between 1 billion and 2.6 billion. If scientists can’t tell which is what, what do they really know? Doesn’t water just cycle around and around? If so, what’s “new” water and what’s “old” water? Aren’t they really talking about water that was sealed away for a billion years? Wouldn’t the excitement be better called “isolated water”?

But that’s just me, being snippy. (Or finding fault with sloppy reporting?) Because this appears to be a big deal, full of exciting new possibilities.

And, actually, if you read the summary article in the journal Nature, it does call the samples being studied isolated water. Nature reports that geochemist Chris Ballentine as saying the mine samples were carefully captured without exposure to air.

The findings are “doubly interesting”, Ballentine says, because the fluid carries the ingredients necessary to support life. The isolated water supply, he says, provides “secluded biomes, ecosystems, in which life, you can speculate, might have even originated”. His colleagues are now working to establish whether the water does harbour life.

The findings may also have implications for life on Mars, Ballentine says, though he acknowledges that the idea is speculative. The surface of Mars once held water and its rocks are chemically no different from those on Earth, he says. “There is no reason to think the same interconnected fluids systems do not exist there.”

The technical article (from Nature) goes by this title: “Deep fracture fluids isolated in the crust since the Precambrian era“.

According to this Canadian report by Postmedia News science reporter Margaret Munro:

Miners drilling deep underground in northern Ontario have long known about the sparkling salty water.

It’s been bubbling out of the rocks beneath their feet since the 1880s, but no one really appreciated the significance — until now.

As Munro reports:

“This is the oldest (water) anybody has been able to pull out, and quite frankly, it changes the playing field,” says geologist Barbara Sherwood Lollar, at the University of Toronto, who co-led the team.

So, there you go. Really, really old/isolated water (from unassuming Timmins!) that could change how science understands early life on earth and (perhaps) on other planets.

This CBC summary article says team co-leader Lollar (which should perhaps be Sherwood Lollar?) will guest on CBC Radio One’s science program Quirks and Quarks Saturday, May 18th at noon.

Was NPR’s portrayal of NY Sen. Gillibrand sexist?

 

US Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand. File Photo: Mark Kurtz

US Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand. File Photo: Mark Kurtz

Ailsa Chang’s NPR profile of New York Senator — and former North Country congresswoman — Kirsten Gillibrand is getting panned on-line and apparently edited by NPR’s on-line crew.

Chang’s report cast Sen. Gillibrand as a soft-voiced woman, whose strength was demonstrated most poignantly by her courage during pregnancy.

Chang also notes that Gillibrand was once described as one of the “hottest” lawmakers in Washington.

All of this at a time when Sen. Gillibrand is taking the lead in opposing sexual assault and bias in the US military.

The coverage has drawn fierce criticism on-line.  Here’s a sample:

Wow, this story really takes me back to the 1970s … and not in a good way. I find the sexist language highly offensive: “girlie voice,” “petite, blond and perky,” “hottest member of the Senate,” indeed!

And another jab:

I am extremely shocked that this article even made it to this section of the website. This article is full of sexist garbage that really just minimizes Senator Gillibrand’s work. You would never hear about a male senator being described this way.

According to Jezebel.com, NPR significantly edited the piece after it was placed on-line, pointing out that “in the edited version of the piece, those descriptors [of Gillibrand] have been tapered down.”

The story still includes questions like this one, taken from Chang’s script:

Gillibrand essentially operates as a single mom during the work week because her husband’s job keeps him in New York City during the weekdays. Friends marvel at her multitasking skills — she manages to get home early nearly every night to cook her two sons dinner, get them bathed, read them books and put them to bed.  But is this woman the stuff presidential candidates are made of?

So what do you think?  Reasonable questions about a rising politician who happens to be a woman?  Or questions asked of a woman — and adjectives applied to a woman — that would never be applied to a male politician?

Fri news roundup: Earthquake, jail crowding, movies

Photo: D Services

Photo: D Services

So I’m about to go on vacation for two weeks, during which time my In Box shoes will be capably filled by other NCPR newsies. Lots today from our newsroom, including: David Sommerstein puzzles out why low water levels on Lake Ontario mean high water levels on the St. Lawrence; people who live in and around Ogdensburg express major concerns about unemployment if the New York State Office of Mental Health closes the St. Lawrence Psychiatric Center there; and an Adirondack company is looking into the possibility of developing a big resort on Loon Lake in Franklin County. And so much more!

Other excitement this morning came out of Canada, as an earthquake that started north of the border was felt by many in our region, including a couple people here in our office in Canton. The Watertown Daily Times reports that the earthquake reached a magnitude of 5.0 after originating northwest of Ottawa (others are saying the magnitude was 5.1 or 5.2.) An aftershock seems to have been felt at least as far down as Syracuse.

WWNY-TV is reporting that the St. Lawrence County jail is overcrowded. NCPR actually reported back in August of last year that the jail, which is just three years old, was already full. Things haven’t improved since then, with 29 inmates having to be housed in jails in Washington and Essex Counties, and some being double-celled. County Sheriff Kevin Wells told WWNY that the conditions are due to several factors, including more drug-related arrests and a backlog of probation department investigations of inmates. The jail’s official capacity is 164 inmates, but the state allows it to house 186 (as it’s currently doing) before it has to move some out.

A planned English school in Ogdensburg for international students is on hold, the Watertown Daily Times is reporting, because owner James Ma hasn’t yet been authorized to do everything he needs to do to get visas for his students. He told the paper there’s not a new opening date yet for the school.

And in the Lewis County village of Lyons Falls, the Valley Brook Drive-In theatre will be open for another season. At the risk of editorializing, I love drive-ins and I can’t tell you how happy this makes me. As the Watertown Daily Times reports today, Valley Brook owner Michael Dekin had been very concerned about whether his theatre would survive the transition to all-digital film distribution that’s been scheduled to take place in September.

This has been a worry for many small theatre owners in the North Country. But Valley Brook and other theatres that haven’t made the (very expensive) transition yet are being given a temporary reprieve, Dekin told the Times, apparently until at least the end of the calendar year. And, Dekin says, the price on the new equipment he’ll have to buy has come down, from about $100,000 to between $51,000 and $64,000.

Assemblyman Vito Lopez to resign, may be expelled from legislature

Assemblyman Vito Lopez, speaking on a bill on the floor of the Assembly. Photo: New York Assembly

Assemblyman Vito Lopez, speaking on a bill on the floor of the Assembly. Photo: New York Assembly

Big political news coming down the pike at the moment, as disgraced Assemblyman Vito Lopez is resigning (soon) and may well be expelled from the legislature. YNN’s Capital Tonight blog reports Lopez says he’ll resign in a month’s time, but Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver says (as do several others) that that’s not enough, and that a resolution to expel him will move forward. Lopez is accused of sexually harassing four legislative aides — the details were made public earlier this week in a report from the state’s Joint Commission on Public Ethics.

Political cartoonist Marquil's comment on the Lopez scandal.

Political cartoonist Marquil’s comment on the Lopez scandal. More of Marquil’s work

However, just FYI, Lopez hasn’t said he’s resigning because of the icky allegations against him, which have been called “alarming” but seemingly don’t rise to the level of criminal. Rather, it’s because, as he’s already said, he’s running for New York’s City Council, which requires him to resign from the state Assembly. This from the Albany Times-Union, quoting a statement Lopez released just before noon today:

Because the citizens of my district voted me back into office last November by an overwhelming majority, I feel obligated to serve out this session of the Assembly. I therefore announce that as of June 20, 2013, the last day of the session, I resign my position…I expect to run a vigorous campaign on the issues facing the citizens of my community and hope to continue to serve them as a member of the City Council. I believe that the voters of the community should decide who should represent them.

Gov. Cuomo said earlier this week that Lopez should either quit or be expelled, and said that the Assembly’s handling of the situation has been “poor…and terribl[e]” (Silver’s office struck a confidential settlement with two other alleged Lopez staffers for more than $100,000 in taxpayer funds, a deal that some say allowed Lopez to continue his abuse of others.)

 

Is the Adirondack Park an economic engine?

Can places like Mt. Baker help draw business and prosperity to villages like Saranac Lake? Photo: Brian Mann

Can places like Mt. Baker help draw business and prosperity to villages like Saranac Lake? Photo: Brian Mann

I was talking yesterday with Saranac Lake Mayor Clyde Rabideau, who was unveiling his village’s new “6er” program, designed to convince people to come check out the cool little mountains that ring his community.

“I talk to people on the trail, which I often do and I ask them if they know about Saranac Lake and most of them don’t.  So this is a way to introduce Saranac Lake and our beautiful mountains to that community.”

That community is the small army of hikers and outdoorspeople — many of them affluent and willing to spend a few bucks while visiting the mountains — that flow out of Boston, Montreal, New York City and other population hubs each weekend.

The interesting thing here is that more and more local leaders seem to be embracing the idea mountains and hiking trails and paddling spots can be a draw and an economic lifeline.

When I first came to the Park a dozen or so years ago, I would often hear elected officials grousing about outdoorspeople.

The general assumption was that they didn’t spend much money or stop at local businesses.

These days, I hear a different sort of thinking:

The idea now is that the marketing needs to appeal to potential visitors and local businesses have to offer products and services that this kind of traveler wants to pay for.

Hikers and paddlers may not spend money in the same way as fishermen and snowmobilers, but they’re still good potential customers.

But getting that formula right, translating more trailheads and boat launches into local prosperity, clearly isn’t easy.

The modern Adirondacks is reaching the half-century mark and a lot of communities are still taking baby steps to try to integrate their marketing, and their business opportunities, with the wild lands and recreation opportunities that surround them.

So here’s my question:  Wherever you are in the Adirondacks, do you see the hiking, paddling, climbing and camping opportunities around you as an economic engine?

Are the public lands and open space that surround your community doing good things for local merchants and workers?  If not, why not?

And what about you folks who visit the Park?  Do you spend a few dollars when you pass through on your way to the trailhead?  Are you finding the services that you’re willing to crack your wallet for?

Comments, as always, welcome below.

Thurs news roundup: FEMA buyouts, economic development, fishing

Photo: Drake Goodman, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Photo: Drake Goodman, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Hello hello hello! A lot from our newsroom this morning. Julie Grant reports on the ongoing questions about the St. Lawrence Psychiatric Center in Ogdensburg: At a forum yesterday at the center, Acting Director of the New York State Office of Mental Health Kristin Woodlock said the state’s moving away from inpatient care. It seems likely that at least some of New York’s 24 psychiatric hospitals will close; Woodlock says the state won’t be making announcements about which ones until early next week.

In Essex County, FEMA is granting about $3.5 million to buy out people whose homes were substantially damaged by Tropical Storm Irene in 2011. A New York prosecutor says Assemblyman Vito Lopez’ alleged sexual harassment of several female staff members, while “alarming”, wasn’t a crime.

And if you love flea markets (I know I do!), you’ll be pleased to know that a third opened yesterday in the Canton-Potsdam area. This one’s in the old Jubilee Plaza off Main Street in Canton. Our own cub reporter-slash-intern Josh Cameron was there and filed a lovely Heard Up North.

In other news today, the co-chairs of the North Country Regional Economic Development Council were in Albany yesterday for the beginning of the next round of competition for economic development funding from the state. As North Country Now reports, our region’s done well in the first two rounds of REDC giving, with almost $200 million going to the region for various economic development projects.

And in the world of leisure, in preparation for this summer’s Bassmaster Elite Series Evan Williams Bourbon Showdown August 8-11 in Waddington (and breathe…), the St. Lawrence County Chamber of Commerce is holding a couple informational sessions:

On June 4, 6 p.m. – 8 p.m. at the community room at Potsdam town Hall, people interested in going to the tournament, sponsoring, vending, advertising, or volunteering can find out more about that (RSVP at (315) 274-9000). On June 12 at the community room in the Village of Potsdam, a marketing specialist will lead a three-hour session (starting at 1 p.m.) called “The Business of Bassmaster,” for business owners who’ll be dealing with visiting anglers. That class is limited to 25 people, and it’s free. Register at (315) 386-4000.

What are the Great American Scandals we ignore?

President Barack Obama speaks on April 10, 2013 about the FY 2014 proposed budget. Image: Video still from whitehouse.gov

President Barack Obama faces the first serious scandals of his presidency.  Are they the right scandals? Image: Video still from whitehouse.gov

I’ve been as captivated as anyone by the sudden burgeoning of scandal in Washington.

Until this month, the Obama administration seemed to skate almost effortlessly above the morass that eventually sucks up most White Houses, from Richard Nixon’s Watergate to Ronald Reagan’s Iran Contra to Bill Clinton’s Whitewater-Lewinski mess.

Those accusations that did get lobbed at Mr. Obama — from Solyndra to death panels to the Fast and Furious probe — were often more politics than substance.  They just didn’t seem to resonate outside the AM talk radio culture on the right.

But now we have a little bit of blood in the water for everyone to target.

Liberals are furious about the Justice Department’s probe of Associated Press reporters — a probe that included tapping phone records and monitoring contacts with sources.

Conservatives are furious about Benghazi, which involved a deadly security lapse in Libya that left four US officials dead.  The White House’s handling of the attack was, at the very least, muddled and unfocused.

When a fuming Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein is demanding answers from a Democratic president, you know it’s not pretty.

Finally, there’s the scandal that everybody wants a piece of — the IRS’s probe of conservative (and apparently, also, liberal) groups to determine whether their political activity violated their tax status.

Mr. Obama has acknowledged that the behavior was outrageous and has forced out a top official, but this one is likely to percolate through the summer.

So as we wade into the pool of muck that Washington DC loves to create for itself, I thought it would be good to highlight five other scandals that probably should be getting talked about — around the watercooler, if not in congressional hearings.

1.  The epidemic of rape and sexual abuse in the US armed forces.  This is making headlines and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is making noises about re-educating service members.  But some lawmakers, including New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, think we need a more major overhaul of the military’s justice system.  In the House, the response has been more ho-hum.  “The House Armed Services Committee hearing into the scandal was sparsely attended and top military officials left before victims’ testimony,” reported NPR’s Here & Now.

2.  US drone attacks on civilians around the world.  Yes, unmanned drones have killed top Al Quaeda leaders and are a potent weapon.  But they’re also killing a lot of civilians (roughly a thousand by conservative estimates, including as many as 200 children) and four US citizens have been killed by drone strike without a trial or any kind of legal process.  “Farmers are on their way to tend their crops when a missile slams into their midst, thrusting shrapnel in all directions,” reported CNN.  “A CIA drone, flying so high that the farmers can’t see it, has killed most of them.”  If a foreign military or spy plane were operating over our air space, blowing up our farmers, I think we would at the very least want a big public discussion about it.

3.  The Great African American Depression.   The overall unemployment rate in the US is on the mend, dropping to 7.5%.  But the truth is that for whites joblessness is a comfortable 6.1%, while for blacks it’s a community-ravaging 13.2%.  That’s just about exactly the same unemployment rate as in 1937, during the Great Depression.  Blacks are most likely to be stuck in long-term unemployment.  One liberal group found that the unemployment rate for young black men who don’t finish high school tops 50%.  “This is an emergency, this is a catastrophe [but Washington is] not rating it as a catastrophe,” said the report’s editor, Craig Gurian, in an interview with conservative news site The Daily Caller.  Seems like someone should be grilling the White House about this.

4.  Guantanamo Bay.  The US is holding roughly 166 people in our detention center in Cuba.  No one is suggesting that high profile terror suspects be released.  But by some estimates as many as half of the detainees have been cleared for release by US intelligence and military agencies.  To be clear, none of these inmates have received any kind of independent judicial process.  Yet even the national security personnel in charge of their fates have determined that they should be let go.  Yet the Obama administration, which promised to fix this mess, continues to hold them, without trial or due process or much explanation.  Imagine how we would feel if a foreign country decided to hold more than a hundred of our citizens indefinitely, even after their own officials had determined that there was no valid reason to do so?

So there’s my back-of-the-napkin list of other things I’d like to see the White House press corps shouting about next time they gather with administration spokesman Jay Carney.

Yes, let’s get some answers on Benghazi, the IRS and the AP phone taps.

But let’s also talk about some of these other issues that raise equally troubling questions about foreign policy judgment, civil liberties and economic fairness.

How about you?  When you think “scandal in Washington” what are the issues that you think should be at the top of the list?  Climate change?  Gun control?  Abortion?  Chime in below.

State, local officials meet on future of St. Lawrence Psych Center

New York State Office of Mental Health Acting Commissioner Kristin Woodlock and her team listening to speakers from the North Country at today's meeting at the St. Lawrence Psychiatric Center in Ogdensburg. Photo: Julie Grant

New York State Office of Mental Health Acting Commissioner Kristin Woodlock and her team listening to speakers from the North Country at today’s meeting at the St. Lawrence Psychiatric Center in Ogdensburg. Photo: Julie Grant

Reporter Julie Grant was in Ogdensburg today at a meeting at St. Lawrence Psychiatric Center about its future. Julie’s working on a story for tomorrow morning’s 8 O’clock Hour, but she took a moment out to give me some information about what went on (here’s the Watertown Daily Times’ coverage of today’s meeting, FYI.)

The meeting was “a packed house” — Julie was told at the door that 302 people had registered to attend, and more had shown up. At the meeting, Kristin Woodlock, acting commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Health, talked about how New York’s health care system is moving toward a “managed care” model, and behavioral health has to move along with it.

She said right now New York has 24 psychiatric hospitals, which is many more than average (for comparison’s sake, Texas has eight, California has five, and New Jersey has four.) She said our state has to move toward that model with less inpatient and more community-based care (questions about quality of care were raised here.)

OMH has said (and Woodlock repeated) that it’s working at creating what are called “Regional Centers of Excellence”, which “emphasiz[e] outpatient care over more costly inpatient treatment [and] could result in some psychiatric hospital closures.

North Country leaders including State Sen. Patty Ritchie and Assemblywoman Addie Russell were at the meeting, making arguments that the center should stay open not only because it provides more than 500 jobs, but because people who need treatment can’t always travel, say, to Syracuse, for mental health care, and in an inpatient situation it’s tough for family and friends to visit them.

The state expects to decide as soon as next week which mental health hospitals it’s going to close. Again, Julie will have more in the morning on this story, and we’ll be following it as it moves forward.

 

Rideau Canal will see reduced hours, but no fee hikes for now

Hartwells Lock #10, Rideau Canal. Photo: D. Gordon E. Robertson, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

Hartwells Lock #10, Rideau Canal. Photo: D. Gordon E. Robertson, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

As boaters get back in the water, here’s an update on proposed changes for the use of historic canal systems in Ontario, including the regionally-significant Rideau Canal.

According to statements from Environment Minister Peter Kent and this Parks Canada press release, there will be no fee hikes for at least three years, but lock services will be reduced.

Here’s more from a Canadian Press report, carried by the CBC.

“In order to support the government in its deficit reducing efforts, the hours of operation throughout the navigation season will be reduced, offering between seven and nine hours of service per day, aligned with demand,” Parks Canada said in response to a media inquiry Tuesday.

The government will now provide “upon arrival services” at locks, meaning a reduced canal staff will drive from lock to lock in an effort to keep up with boating traffic moving through the system.

Leeds-Grenville MP Gord Brown was one of the area politicians who worked to avert fee hikes. According to the Eastern Ontario Network, Brown had this to say in a press release dated 5/15:

“I and my colleagues have been working long and hard on this issue and I am happy to announce that our request for consultation on the future of the canal has been answered,” he says.

“This will give us all time to take a long look at what we can do to improve the canal.”

The problem, as usual, is money.

Parks Canada is charged with operating the historic canal systems, but that agency says they only recovers about 10% of actual costs from user fees.

One parliamentary proposal reportedly under consideration is to removed canal operation from Parks Canada into some new, independent agency.