Posts Tagged ‘energy’

Morning Read: Snail power!

March 19th, 2012 by Brian Mann

Who needs hydro dams and nuclear power plants!  Pah on those hydrofracking projects!  I say snails are the power source of the future.

Okay – actually this is serious stuff, an effort by Clarkson University to research tiny "biofuel cells" that could eventually power things like implanted medical devices.  This from the Watertown Daily Times.

A team of scientists at Clarkson University has developed technology to turn an ordinary snail into a living, moving battery.

The research was published earlier this month in the Journal of the American Chemical Society with Evgeny Katz, Milton Kerker chaired professor of colloid science at Clarkson, as the lead author.

The technology involves tiny implants, called biofuel cells, charged by chemical reactions in the snail’s blood. Though a snail generates only a tiny amount of electrical charge, the electricity is accumulated in a device called a condenser, which can then power another small device if needed.

Read the full article here.

A twist of colored glass, a North Country river, a hard, fascinating life

March 7th, 2012 by Brian Mann

It's strange where life takes you.  Matt Foley, who I profiled today, runs a couple of hydro-power dams in the Adirondacks, in Wadhams in Essex County and St. Regis Falls in Franklin County.

He got his start as an artisanal glass blower back in the 1970s.  When the energy crisis hit, he set out across the North Country looking for a cheap way to power his art.

That jumping off point led to a life of wrestling with North Country rivers and tangling with the politics of energy production in the US.

He prowled the backcountry, salvaging parts from abandoned hydro projects in Speculator, Saranac Inn, and the old Lake Placid Club.

His dams, which feed electricity to about 600 North Country homes, are part of a long history, a tradition where local hydro powered industries and whole communities.  (Foley's Wadhams plant powers most of the homes in Westport.)

His two dams survived last year's spring floods and tropical storm Irene and Foley is clearly weary, as worn out and frustrated as many of the farmers and loggers who've struggled to make a go of it in our hardscrabble region.

Not an easy life, but a fascinating one, carved out of an American tradition of ingenuity and hard-work.

"When I got here I had a BA in psychology and I was the child of an office worker," Foley told me.

"I was completely ignorant.  What it comes down to is if you don't know how to do something, just start. Make a start somewhere and if you're doing it right, you'll find that out. And if you're doing it wrong, you'll find that out, too."

When I was visiting his power plant in Wadhams, I noticed these old pieces sitting on a shelf in a window.  Foley, who's 63 now, says he hasn't blown glass for three decades.

But it all began with those shapes of melted glass.

Are you comfortable using Canadian energy?

March 6th, 2012 by Brian Mann

If you live in the Northeast, there's a good chance that at least some of the time your life is running on Canadian electricity.  Canada also provides a growing chunk of American petroleum imports — about as much as Saudi Arabia and Venezuela combined.

Canada's energy industry says their exports are an "ethical" alternative to oil from the Middle East, and from other parts of the world where environmental laws are far less stringent.

But many green groups say Canada is paying far too high a price in environmental degradation, with the flooding of vast river valleys for hydro power in northern Quebec, and the sprawling tar sands development in Alberta.

The latest flashpoint is the Keystone XL pipeline, which would accelerate oil imports from our northern neighbor.

So what do you think?  Is this a good relationship?  Is the price too high?  If so, what are the alternatives?  As always, your comments welcome.

Health Canada drafting national guidelines for wind turbines

January 21st, 2012 by Lucy Martin

Clean, renewable power from abundant natural sources. Remember when that seemed like something that just required harvesting?

Lately wind power can't shake persistent debate. In Canada, critics charge that wind turbines create visual pollution, depressed property values, danger to migratory birds and a range of health issues for humans living near the massive blades.

A few years ago, the Province of Ontario warmly embraced wind power as a way to reduce current dependence on coal and nuclear power plants. Official provincial support is still strong, although it is also starting to sound defensive. The Dunnville Chronicle reports that Ontario's Minister of the Environment, Jim Bradley, just released a consultant's report stating:

…the province's rules to control wind turbine sound are "rigorous" and that Ontario has one of the strictest noise limits in North America, which includes a 550-metre minimum setback based on a 40-decibel level.

Ontario's initial rush to approve wind farms has slowed as opponents have organized around issues of health. There's a moratorium on off-shore wind projects (which is not terribly significant as most projects are built on land) and calls for holding off on new land-based wind projects until more studies are done.

Now Canada's federal government says national safety guidelines for wind power are being developed to address the current province-by-province patch work.  As described in this Ottawa Citizen article:

"Health Canada has been working in collaboration with the provinces and territories to draft voluntary Canadian Guidelines for Wind Turbine Noise," wrote Health Canada spokeswoman Olivia Caron in an email.

"The voluntary draft guidelines are health-based, and focus on minimizing potential impacts such as sleep disturbance by recommending noise limits, sound measurement standards and minimum setback distances from homes and occupied dwellings."

It's worth noting the guidelines are described as voluntary. With so much dispute about what harm (if any) can be actually be proven and what information counts as evidence, this does seem like a tricky thing to regulate.

Could energy be the North Country's next big thing?

November 1st, 2011 by Brian Mann

The last couple of weeks, I've listened in as Tony Collins, head of Clarkson University and co-chair of the North Country Regional Economic Development Council has talked up the opportunities of a sort of local energy movement.

"I know there are projects in the pipeline that rely on energy and utilize natural resources, the forest reserves, forest products," Collins told me recently.

This same idea has been a steady theme for Kate Fish, head of the Adirondack North Country Association.

As the region talks about and debates a unified theme for our shared economic future, energy seems like an interesting angle to explore.

After all, our communities are already industry leaders in hydro and wind power.  Watertown has a chain of power generating dams right in the middle of the city.  Big hydro facilities on the St. Lawrence River are cornerstones of the regional economy.

The Tug Hill and Clinton County have seen sizable wind farms kicking into gear.

What if rural towns and small cities also became major exporters of wood pellets for stoves and producers of electricity at biomass facilities?

Is it impossible to think that this region could become a next exporter of energy in the next decade?

One big and necessary step would involve a massive effort to improve the efficiency of North Country homes, so that we consume far less heating oil in the winter.

An expansion of public transportation and the adoption of more energy-efficient vehicles would also help.

Remember, every gallon of oil that we avoid burning means more money staying here in our economy.

The Wildlife Conservation Society's Jerry Jenkins has also been writing and thinking about the opportunities (and the challenges) of this kind of transition.

His latest book gives a fascinating portrait of the energy economy in a rural region like ours.

The short term benefits, in terms of jobs developed and products exported, seem worth exploring.

But it's also reasonable to imagine a future where the rest of the US suffers big energy shocks, shortages, and price spikes, while the North Country controls more of its own destiny.

So what do you think?  Would you rather see your warmth this summer come from a local pellet plant, rather than a big oil company?

Are you skeptical that wind, hydro and biomass can really fuel a vibrant economy?  Comments welcome.

Marquil's View: Democrats love their hydrocarbons

September 25th, 2011 by Brian Mann

Morning Read: Cape Vincent election favors anti-wind candidates

September 22nd, 2011 by Brian Mann

The Watertown Daily Times is reporting that a slate of wind farm opponents fared well in this month's town supervisor race, with Urban Hirschey defeating pro-wind candidate Harvey White by a more than 4-to-1 margin.

That Mr. Hirschey’s already lopsided victory got even more lopsided when absentee ballots were counted is hardly a surprise. It is likely a result of a months-long voter registration drive by anti-wind power activists that targeted seasonal residents.

Seasonal residents who may live during the winter in faraway locales are more likely to oppose wind power development and more likely to vote as absentees — which can allow people to vote via mail in the days leading up to the election, rather than in person on election day.

The absentee ballot counts were similarly grim for pro-wind power Town Council candidates in the Republican primary.

The politics of wind power are fascinating — and it's complicated further by this "local" vs. "seasonal" dynamic, a tension that plays out in political affairs across the North Country.  Read the full article here.

Marquil's take: NY's frack addicts

September 9th, 2011 by Brian Mann

Check out more of Marquil's stuff here.

Canadian official says wind turbines too loud

August 16th, 2011 by Julie Grant

A memo written last year by a senior environmental official with the Ontario Ministry of the Environment says that wind turbines are permitted to produce too much noise.

The Ottawa Citizen reports that an anti-wind group got a copy of the memo by filing a Freedom of Information Act request.

Ontario regulations permit wind turbines to produce 40 decibels.  The memo  recommends a sharp reduction in allowable levels, in the range of 30 to 32 decibels.

Morning Read: North Country municipal power project dissolves into name calling

August 16th, 2011 by Brian Mann

The Watertown Daily Times is reporting this morning that plans to develop a municipal power system for 24 North Country towns is "dead in the water" and accusations are flying.

The project was designed to cut power costs in the communities by developing a sort of collective that could negotiate better electricity contracts.

Some partners are blaming James Monroe, the man who has led the project.  The newspaper quotes at length Kenneth C. Anderson, a Washington DC attorney who has been a consultant on the effort.

“Nobody wants to work with [Monroe],” Mr. Anderson said. “He has a terrible temper and if you disagree with him, he just goes into a shell and refuses to do anything.”

A number of board members have asked that Monroe be dismissed by Governor Andrew Cuomo.  But in today's article, Monroe fires back, insisting that the municipal power concept is still viable.

“I got all these guys against me, it’s a challenge,” he said. “But I know what’s right and I know what’s wrong. If I should leave, the NCPA will really not be as vibrant and as profitable as I intend to make it.”

So what do you think?  Is this feud forcing your community — and local businesses — to pay higher power rates than necessary?